{
  "abstract": "This study audits the numerical artifacts deposited with the Trinity prompt-context framework. Its primary table contains 81 scores under seven model labels, with 27 in each context: factual or impersonal (C1), self-directed (C2), and creative (C3). The mean deposited percentages are 0.091%, 9.360% and 3.229%, respectively. Every C2 score exceeds every C1 score; C3 overlaps both distributions. Equal weighting of the seven model-label means preserves the ordering, but the direction of the original-to-expanded C3 mean difference reverses when the comparison is restricted to four shared labels. These are finite-table descriptions, not independent trials or verified measurements of a common lexical construct. Complete responses, authenticated prompt linkage and endpoint snapshots remain unavailable, and candidate scripts use inconsistent scoring rules. The source audit also finds instruction-tuned models in the alleged base-model comparison, row rather than prompt resampling, counts reconstructed from assumed denominators, pattern-presence percentages presented as functional prevalence, and regex lists presented as morphological parsing. This revision preserves reproducible arithmetic and numerical lineage while withdrawing the unsupported measurement and generalization claims. The observed ordering does not identify latent states, a causal effect of reinforcement learning from human feedback, or cross-language invariance. No new model outputs were generated.\n\nCorrective release of the Trinity preprint. The corrected manuscript and audit supplement supersede earlier interpretations; historical files are retained as provenance. Related Research Square record: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-8935463 . This preprint is not peer reviewed.",
  "abstract_shown": true,
  "affiliations": [
    "Independent researcher"
  ],
  "article_type": null,
  "arxiv": null,
  "author_total": 1,
  "authors": [
    {
      "affs": [
        0
      ],
      "name": "Andrei-Sebastian Ursachi",
      "orcid": "0009-0002-6114-5011"
    }
  ],
  "bibtex": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/242736cwys566.bib",
  "cited_by": 0,
  "doi": "10.5281/zenodo.23649042",
  "fulltext_url": null,
  "id": "242736cwys566",
  "issns": [],
  "landing_url": "https://zenodo.org/records/23649042",
  "language": "eng",
  "licence": "CC-BY-4.0",
  "licence_label": "CC BY 4.0",
  "licence_source": "article",
  "licence_url": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "metadata_licence": null,
  "native_subjects": [],
  "openalex": null,
  "pdf_url": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/23649042/files/Trinity_Corrected_Manuscript.pdf/content",
  "pmcid": null,
  "pmid": null,
  "published": "2026-10-25",
  "publisher": null,
  "ris": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/242736cwys566.ris",
  "sources": [
    {
      "first_seen": "2026-11-08T12:21:01Z",
      "native_id": "23649042",
      "source": "zenodo",
      "url": "https://zenodo.org/records/23649042"
    }
  ],
  "subjects": [],
  "title": "A descriptive reanalysis of prompt context differences in the Trinity score corpus",
  "title_text": "A descriptive reanalysis of prompt context differences in the Trinity score corpus",
  "type": "preprint",
  "updated_at": "2026-11-08T12:21:01Z",
  "url": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/242736cwys566",
  "venue": "Zenodo",
  "versions": []
}