{
  "abstract": "This article examines how contemporary authoritarian regimes remain stable despite weak economic performance, limited institutional credibility, and persistent crises.Explanations centered on coercion, material resources, or legal manipulation do not fully account for this durability.The article advances the concept of moralized authoritarianism to capture a mechanism of legitimation based on the normative reconfiguration of civic expectations rather than on performance or repression.Using fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) of Sahelian and extra-Sahelian cases, the study examines configurations combining the moralization of power, information control, autocratic legalism, crisis, and militarization.The results show that no single condition is strictly necessary for stabilization.However, the moralization of power and information control emerge as quasi-necessary conditions, while multiple equifinal configurations lead to stabilization, revealing a strong causal asymmetry between stabilization and breakdown.The findings indicate that authoritarian durability may rest on moralized legitimation, whereby loyalty to official narratives supersedes factual verification as a criterion of political legitimacy.These results also suggest that analyses of contemporary authoritarianism should pay greater attention to the moral and informational infrastructures through which regimes transform crisis and constraints into sources of political legitimacy.",
  "abstract_shown": true,
  "affiliations": [],
  "article_type": null,
  "arxiv": null,
  "author_total": 1,
  "authors": [
    {
      "name": "Fakaba Sissoko Etienne"
    }
  ],
  "bibtex": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/2jzknprw6mgfk.bib",
  "cited_by": 0,
  "doi": "10.5897/ajpsir2026.1577",
  "fulltext_url": null,
  "id": "2jzknprw6mgfk",
  "issns": [
    "1996-0832"
  ],
  "landing_url": "https://hal.science/hal-05838239v1",
  "language": "en",
  "licence": "CC-BY",
  "licence_label": "CC BY",
  "licence_source": "journal",
  "licence_url": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "metadata_licence": null,
  "native_subjects": [
    [
      "hal",
      "0.sdv"
    ],
    [
      "hal",
      "0.shs"
    ],
    [
      "hal",
      "1.sdv.neu"
    ],
    [
      "hal",
      "1.shs.info"
    ],
    [
      "hal",
      "1.shs.scipo"
    ],
    [
      "hal",
      "2.sdv.neu.sc"
    ],
    [
      "openalex",
      "3312|Political Conflict and Governance"
    ]
  ],
  "openalex": "W7221179159",
  "pdf_url": "https://academicjournals.org/journal/AJPSIR/article-full-text-pdf/6FEA7C075024",
  "pmcid": null,
  "pmid": null,
  "published": "2026-10-30",
  "publisher": "Academic Journals",
  "ris": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/2jzknprw6mgfk.ris",
  "sources": [
    {
      "first_seen": "2026-10-30T12:18:01Z",
      "native_id": "hal-05838239",
      "source": "hal",
      "url": "https://hal.science/hal-05838239v1"
    }
  ],
  "subjects": [
    {
      "field": "biology",
      "origin": "hal:1.sdv.neu",
      "subfield": "neuroscience"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Moralized authoritarianism in the Sahel: Theory, measurement and empirical evidence (20202025)",
  "title_text": "Moralized authoritarianism in the Sahel: Theory, measurement and empirical evidence (20202025)",
  "type": "peer-reviewed",
  "updated_at": "2026-10-30T12:18:01Z",
  "url": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/2jzknprw6mgfk",
  "venue": "African Journal of Political Science and International Relations",
  "versions": []
}