{
  "abstract": "BackgroundThe clone-censor-weight (CCW) method is increasingly finding application in target trial emulation to compare treatment strategies involving grace periods. However, its performance has not been systematically evaluated against the ground truth. Many studies utilising CCW ignore time-varying covariates and informative pre-existing censoring. Heavy-tailed inverse probability of censoring weights (IPCW) may yield biased estimates and under-coverage.\n\nMethodsSimulation Part 1 evaluated the bias, root mean squared error, and coverage probability of CCW analysis under correctly specified and misspecified IPCW models across scenarios with or without time-varying covariates and informative pre-existing censoring. Part 2 varied the confounding strength, assessing whether inference failures could be detected using an IPCW tail-heaviness index (a weighted Hill estimator-derived Pareto-type tail index) and the estimators standard deviation, the target of bootstrap standard error.\n\nResultsUnder correct specification, all bias estimates were below 0.005; coverage approached the nominal level of 0.95 with increasing sample size. Omitting the time-varying covariate or mishandling pre-existing censoring yielded bias up to 0.069 and coverage substantially below 0.95. Under strong confounding, confidence intervals failed to attain nominal coverage, even with correct specification and large sample sizes, when the oracle tail-heaviness index was [≤]1. When the index was >1, the coverage approached 0.95 as the estimators standard deviation decreased.\n\nConclusionsCCW analysis yields accurate estimates and confidence intervals with nominal coverage when implemented correctly, and confounding is not excessively strong. Investigators should account for time-varying covariates and pre-existing censoring and evaluate the tail behaviour of IPCW distribution and estimators bootstrap standard error.\n\nKey messages- Correctly specified and implemented clone-censor-weight analyses can provide accurate strategy-specific risk estimates and confidence intervals with nominal coverage, whereas misspecified or incorrectly implemented analyses, such as those failing to account for time-varying confounders or informative pre-existing censoring, can yield biased estimates and under-coverage. - Even with correct model specifications and large samples, strong confounding can lead to heavy-tailed distributions of the inverse probability of censoring weights and invalidate standard confidence interval construction. - The tail heaviness index of the inverse probability of censoring weight distribution, in conjunction with the estimators bootstrap standard error, can help identify unreliable analyses and guide the specification of eligibility criteria and treatment strategies.",
  "abstract_shown": true,
  "affiliations": [
    "The University of Tokyo"
  ],
  "article_type": "PUBLISHAHEADOFPRINT",
  "arxiv": null,
  "author_total": 3,
  "authors": [
    {
      "affs": [
        0
      ],
      "name": "Y. Kimura"
    },
    {
      "name": "Y. Takazawa"
    },
    {
      "name": "H. Yasunaga"
    }
  ],
  "bibtex": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/461znmwwq9dnm.bib",
  "cited_by": 0,
  "doi": "10.64898/2026.09.02.26362102",
  "fulltext_url": "https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.02.26362102v1.full",
  "id": "461znmwwq9dnm",
  "issns": [],
  "landing_url": "https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.02.26362102v1",
  "language": null,
  "licence": "CC-BY",
  "licence_label": "CC BY",
  "licence_source": "article",
  "licence_url": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "metadata_licence": null,
  "native_subjects": [
    [
      "medrxiv",
      "epidemiology"
    ],
    [
      "openalex",
      "2613|Advanced Causal Inference Techniques"
    ]
  ],
  "openalex": "W7211954736",
  "pdf_url": "https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.02.26362102v1.full.pdf",
  "pmcid": null,
  "pmid": null,
  "published": "2026-09-02",
  "publisher": null,
  "ris": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/461znmwwq9dnm.ris",
  "sources": [
    {
      "first_seen": "2026-10-30T12:17:58Z",
      "native_id": "10.64898/2026.09.02.26362102",
      "source": "medrxiv",
      "url": "https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.02.26362102v1"
    }
  ],
  "subjects": [
    {
      "field": "medicine",
      "origin": "medrxiv:epidemiology",
      "subfield": "epidemiology-public-health"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Pitfalls and Solutions in Clone-Censor-Weight for Target Trial Emulation: Insights from Review, Simulation, and Real-World Analyses",
  "title_text": "Pitfalls and Solutions in Clone-Censor-Weight for Target Trial Emulation: Insights from Review, Simulation, and Real-World Analyses",
  "type": "preprint",
  "updated_at": "2026-10-30T12:17:58Z",
  "url": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/461znmwwq9dnm",
  "venue": "medRxiv",
  "versions": []
}