{
  "abstract": "This paper develops The Relational Conditioning Paradox (RCP) as a candidate general theoretical framework for investigating whether a focal system's observable or functional manifestation can be adequately characterized independently of the relational configuration in which that system is embedded. The primary case is the Trauma Conditioned Evaluation Paradox (TCEP), in which a history of adverse conditioning may produce later patterns of evaluation, response, or performance that do not straightforwardly reveal the system's underlying functional capacity. The analysis deliberately avoids treating trauma, evaluation, realization, divergence, time, or any particular operation as the universal primitive.\n\nInstead, the same primary case is examined at nine analytical resolutions: philosophical-ontological, epistemological, analytical psychological, clinical psychological, cognitive-scientific, mechanistic neuroscientific, systems-theoretical, functional/operational, and mathematical. Every layer follows an invariant three-step protocol: default mechanism, abstraction, and paradox/boundary. The resulting candidate abstraction is then stress-tested through temporal dynamics, a taxonomy of divergence and invariance, boundary conditions, simulation, falsifiability, counterexamples, alternative explanations, worked examples, and an empirical validation roadmap.\n\nThe central formal comparison is between an intrinsic model, M=F_{0}(S), and a relational model, M=F(S,\\mathcal{R}). The framework explicitly distinguishes system state, manifestation, and measurement, and it treats relational dependence as a candidate mechanism rather than an a priori universal law. No universal status is claimed without cross-domain evidence, active attempts at falsification, independent replication, and comparative explanatory necessity.",
  "abstract_shown": true,
  "affiliations": [
    "Independent Researcher"
  ],
  "article_type": null,
  "arxiv": null,
  "author_total": 1,
  "authors": [
    {
      "affs": [
        0
      ],
      "name": "Shamiul Hoque Shan"
    }
  ],
  "bibtex": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/6mbc03zazbmqf.bib",
  "cited_by": 0,
  "doi": "10.5281/zenodo.23480708",
  "fulltext_url": null,
  "id": "6mbc03zazbmqf",
  "issns": [],
  "landing_url": "https://zenodo.org/records/23480708",
  "language": null,
  "licence": "CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0",
  "licence_label": "CC BY-NC-ND 4.0",
  "licence_source": "article",
  "licence_url": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/",
  "metadata_licence": null,
  "native_subjects": [],
  "openalex": null,
  "pdf_url": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/23480708/files/THE_RELATIONAL_CONDITIONING_PARADOX__RCP_.pdf/content",
  "pmcid": null,
  "pmid": null,
  "published": "2026-10-19",
  "publisher": null,
  "ris": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/6mbc03zazbmqf.ris",
  "sources": [
    {
      "first_seen": "2026-11-02T12:20:56Z",
      "native_id": "23480708",
      "source": "zenodo",
      "url": "https://zenodo.org/records/23480708"
    }
  ],
  "subjects": [],
  "title": "THE RELATIONAL CONDITIONING PARADOX (RCP)",
  "title_text": "THE RELATIONAL CONDITIONING PARADOX (RCP)",
  "type": "preprint",
  "updated_at": "2026-11-02T12:20:56Z",
  "url": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/6mbc03zazbmqf",
  "venue": "Zenodo",
  "versions": []
}