{
  "abstract": "Psychology has a measurement problem: different constructs often share the same name, and the same construct is measured under different names. This matters most for constructs theorized as interdependent. In theory, these constructs are defined by name, and their interdependence is posited at that level; in practice, each is measured by a pool of items, often from separate questionnaires, which may overlap or diverge in ways the names do not anticipate. We asked whether construct names correspond to the items that operationalize them, whether items reflect the structure of responses, and whether responses follow the boundaries posited by names or drawn by items. Using reflective functioning, epistemic trust, and difficulties in emotion regulation as a case study, we compared semantic similarities of construct names and items with response correlations in 1,167 emerging adults (aged 18–29, 72% female; item-level analyses preregistered) and 1,068 secondary school students (aged 14–20, 67% female). Construct names best matched their own items in 4 of 11 subscales. Items reflected the structure of responses (r = .62 and .58), also, less closely, across questionnaires (.42 and .37). Responses followed boundaries drawn by items more than those posited by names. A correlation between such measures, usually read as evidence of interdependence, may also arise from items that describe the same experience or from shared method variance. What theory says about a construct thus applies only in part to what its items measure.",
  "abstract_shown": true,
  "affiliations": [],
  "article_type": null,
  "arxiv": null,
  "author_total": 4,
  "authors": [
    {
      "name": "Ilaria Maria Antonietta Benzi"
    },
    {
      "name": "Marco Marelli"
    },
    {
      "name": "Laura Antonia Lucia Parolin"
    },
    {
      "name": "Karin Ensink"
    }
  ],
  "bibtex": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/6tp39z6ywntcr.bib",
  "cited_by": 0,
  "doi": "10.31234/osf.io/g9fhq_v1",
  "fulltext_url": null,
  "id": "6tp39z6ywntcr",
  "issns": [],
  "landing_url": "https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/g9fhq_v1/",
  "language": null,
  "licence": "CC-BY-4.0",
  "licence_label": "CC BY 4.0",
  "licence_source": "article",
  "licence_url": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "metadata_licence": null,
  "native_subjects": [
    [
      "bepress",
      "Affect and Emotion Regulation"
    ],
    [
      "bepress",
      "Assessment"
    ],
    [
      "bepress",
      "Clinical Psychology"
    ],
    [
      "bepress",
      "Linguistics"
    ],
    [
      "bepress",
      "Meta-science"
    ],
    [
      "bepress",
      "Psychometrics"
    ],
    [
      "bepress",
      "Quantitative Methods"
    ],
    [
      "bepress",
      "Social and Behavioral Sciences"
    ],
    [
      "bepress",
      "Social and Personality Psychology"
    ],
    [
      "openalex",
      "1803|Psychometric Methodologies and Testing"
    ]
  ],
  "openalex": "W7223562307",
  "pdf_url": "https://osf.io/g9fhq/download",
  "pmcid": null,
  "pmid": null,
  "published": "2026-10-25",
  "publisher": null,
  "ris": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/6tp39z6ywntcr.ris",
  "sources": [
    {
      "first_seen": "2026-10-30T12:19:20Z",
      "native_id": "g9fhq",
      "source": "osf",
      "url": "https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/g9fhq_v1/"
    }
  ],
  "subjects": [
    {
      "field": "medicine",
      "origin": "bepress:Clinical Psychology",
      "subfield": "psychiatry"
    }
  ],
  "title": "The Map Is Not the Territory: Construct Names, Items, and Responses in Measures of Mentalizing, Epistemic Trust, and Emotion Regulation",
  "title_text": "The Map Is Not the Territory: Construct Names, Items, and Responses in Measures of Mentalizing, Epistemic Trust, and Emotion Regulation",
  "type": "preprint",
  "updated_at": "2026-10-30T12:19:20Z",
  "url": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/6tp39z6ywntcr",
  "venue": "PsyArXiv",
  "versions": []
}