{
  "abstract": "Mediation analysis is widely used across psychology to support claims about psychological mechanisms. Such claims often carry causal interpretations that depend on assumptions that are frequently left unstated, and may not be justified under traditional mediation approaches. Despite substantial advances in mediation best practices emerging from the field of causal inference, uptake of these approaches has remained low, possibly because the literature is highly technical and lacks comprehensive, integrated practical implementation guidance. This paper addresses that gap by integrating developments in causal mediation into an accessible, fully demonstrated workflow for applied researchers without prior causal inference knowledge. We identify two major limitations of traditional mediation approaches: vulnerability to mediator–outcome confounding and reliance on a product-of-coefficients approach that cannot account for predictor–mediator interactions and certain nonlinear models more generally. We then present concrete solutions that can be applied throughout the research workflow with limited additional work: before data collection (design-based solutions), during mediation effect estimation, and after analysis to assess robustness (sensitivity analysis). In doing so, we introduce key causal inference frameworks (directed acyclic graphs and potential outcomes) to facilitate understanding of these problems, bridge conceptual reasoning and practical solutions, and equip readers to apply these concepts in their own study contexts. Finally, we provide a fully worked example, including R code that readers can adapt for their own use. Overall, the proposed workflow requires only modest extensions to standard practice but can substantially improve the validity of causal claims drawn from mediation analysis.",
  "abstract_shown": true,
  "affiliations": [],
  "article_type": null,
  "arxiv": null,
  "author_total": 3,
  "authors": [
    {
      "name": "Joshua D Wenger"
    },
    {
      "name": "Zoe Baker"
    },
    {
      "name": "Vasant G Honavar"
    }
  ],
  "bibtex": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/7p7dtzcw1efcz.bib",
  "cited_by": 0,
  "doi": "10.31234/osf.io/sz7vx_v2",
  "fulltext_url": null,
  "id": "7p7dtzcw1efcz",
  "issns": [],
  "landing_url": "https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/sz7vx_v2/",
  "language": null,
  "licence": "CC-BY-4.0",
  "licence_label": "CC BY 4.0",
  "licence_source": "article",
  "licence_url": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "metadata_licence": null,
  "native_subjects": [
    [
      "bepress",
      "Quantitative Methods"
    ],
    [
      "bepress",
      "Social and Behavioral Sciences"
    ],
    [
      "bepress",
      "Statistical Methods"
    ]
  ],
  "openalex": null,
  "pdf_url": "https://osf.io/sz7vx/download",
  "pmcid": null,
  "pmid": null,
  "published": "2026-09-04",
  "publisher": null,
  "ris": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/7p7dtzcw1efcz.ris",
  "sources": [
    {
      "first_seen": "2026-10-30T12:25:48Z",
      "native_id": "sz7vx",
      "source": "osf",
      "url": "https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/sz7vx_v2/"
    }
  ],
  "subjects": [
    {
      "field": "mathematics",
      "origin": "bepress:Statistical Methods",
      "subfield": "statistics"
    }
  ],
  "title": "A Practical Causal Mediation Workflow for Psychologists: From Concepts to Implementation",
  "title_text": "A Practical Causal Mediation Workflow for Psychologists: From Concepts to Implementation",
  "type": "preprint",
  "updated_at": "2026-10-30T12:25:48Z",
  "url": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/7p7dtzcw1efcz",
  "venue": "PsyArXiv",
  "versions": []
}