{
  "abstract": "Three-dimensional (3D) printing is increasingly used for denture base fabrication, but printer-dependent processing may alter the properties of the same resin. This in vitro study compared Lucitone Digital Print 3D Denture Base resin fabricated with two manufacturer-validated systems: Carbon M2 (continuous liquid interface production) and Asiga MAX UV (digital light processing) (n = 10 per printer per outcome). After standardized cleaning, post-curing, and 7 days of water storage at 37 ± 1 °C, flexural strength, fracture toughness, fracture work, Vickers hardness, and surface roughness were evaluated. Asiga specimens showed significantly higher flexural strength (83.5 ± 2.0 vs. 76.9 ± 1.2 MPa; p < 0.0001), fracture work (1853 ± 330 vs. 1452 ± 295 J/m 2 ; p = 0.010), and Vickers hardness (12.5 ± 0.7 vs. 11.4 ± 0.6 kg/mm 2 ; p = 0.007). Fracture toughness, expressed as Kmax, did not differ significantly between Carbon and Asiga specimens (2.91 ± 0.36 vs. 2.75 ± 0.27 MPa·m^0.5; p = 0.287), nor did surface roughness (1.72 ± 0.24 vs. 2.13 ± 0.84 µm; p = 0.283). Thus, the printer system influenced selected mechanical properties of an identical denture-base resin, highlighting the importance of considering the complete resin–printer–post-processing system when interpreting material performance.",
  "abstract_shown": true,
  "affiliations": [],
  "article_type": null,
  "arxiv": null,
  "author_total": 5,
  "authors": [
    {
      "name": "Raghdah M. Alshaibani"
    },
    {
      "name": "Yuwei Fan"
    },
    {
      "name": "Russell Giordano II"
    },
    {
      "name": "Anhar Basunbul"
    },
    {
      "name": "Abdulrahman Almalki"
    }
  ],
  "bibtex": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/8r97yfzdr8w6n.bib",
  "cited_by": 0,
  "doi": "10.1177/22808000261506092",
  "fulltext_url": "https://doi.org/10.1177/22808000261506092",
  "id": "8r97yfzdr8w6n",
  "issns": [
    "2280-8000"
  ],
  "landing_url": "https://doi.org/10.1177/22808000261506092",
  "language": "en",
  "licence": "CC-BY",
  "licence_label": "CC BY",
  "licence_source": "journal",
  "licence_url": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "metadata_licence": null,
  "native_subjects": [
    [
      "lcc",
      "TP248.13-248.65"
    ],
    [
      "openalex",
      "3500|Dental materials and restorations"
    ]
  ],
  "openalex": "W7225414533",
  "pdf_url": null,
  "pmcid": null,
  "pmid": null,
  "published": "2026-11-07",
  "publisher": "SAGE Publishing",
  "ris": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/8r97yfzdr8w6n.ris",
  "sources": [
    {
      "first_seen": "2026-11-07T14:21:11Z",
      "native_id": "0bc2cca85f8b463fa28d5bf7d43733ca",
      "source": "doaj",
      "url": "https://doi.org/10.1177/22808000261506092"
    }
  ],
  "subjects": [
    {
      "field": "biology",
      "origin": "lcc:TP248.13-248.65",
      "subfield": "systems-synthetic"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Influence of 3D-Printing system on the mechanical and surface properties of a 3D-Printed denture base resin",
  "title_text": "Influence of 3D-Printing system on the mechanical and surface properties of a 3D-Printed denture base resin",
  "type": "peer-reviewed",
  "updated_at": "2026-11-09T14:20:58Z",
  "url": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/8r97yfzdr8w6n",
  "venue": "Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials",
  "versions": []
}