{
  "abstract": "In an ideal world, authors would report clearly and transparently exactly what they conducted. In reality, reporting is often incomplete, and key elements of research conduct are frequently missing from manuscripts. Reporting guidelines were developed to address this problem by helping authors identify what should be reported. These guidelines have been highly valuable for authors, but they are not well suited for appraising reporting during peer review or editorial assessment despite common use. This is because authors and appraisers have different needs: authors require a comprehensive guide for writing, whereas appraisers need a tool that is concise, repeatable, and easy to use. We therefore propose the development of reporting appraisal tools: operationalised tools designed specifically to assess whether a paper has reported the minimum essential elements of a study. To support their development, we present 10 simple rules.",
  "abstract_shown": true,
  "affiliations": [
    "Collaboration for Open Science and Synthesis in Ecology and Evolution (COSSEE), Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada"
  ],
  "article_type": "Education",
  "arxiv": null,
  "author_total": 2,
  "authors": [
    {
      "affs": [
        0
      ],
      "name": "Kyle Morrison"
    },
    {
      "name": "Malgorzata Lagisz"
    }
  ],
  "bibtex": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/9ft9xmr2mjr16.bib",
  "cited_by": 0,
  "doi": "10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014841",
  "fulltext_url": "https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014841",
  "id": "9ft9xmr2mjr16",
  "issns": [
    "1553-7358",
    "1553-734X"
  ],
  "landing_url": "https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014841",
  "language": "eng",
  "licence": "CC-BY",
  "licence_label": "CC BY",
  "licence_source": "article",
  "licence_url": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "metadata_licence": null,
  "native_subjects": [
    [
      "openalex",
      "1804|Meta-analysis and systematic reviews"
    ],
    [
      "plos",
      "/Biology and life sciences/Neuroscience/Cognitive science/Cognition/Decision making"
    ],
    [
      "plos",
      "/Biology and life sciences/Neuroscience/Cognitive science/Cognitive psychology/Decision making"
    ],
    [
      "plos",
      "/Biology and life sciences/Psychology/Cognitive psychology/Decision making"
    ],
    [
      "plos",
      "/Engineering and technology/Navigation/Steering"
    ],
    [
      "plos",
      "/Medicine and health sciences/Clinical medicine/Clinical trials/Randomized controlled trials"
    ],
    [
      "plos",
      "/Medicine and health sciences/Pharmacology/Drug research and development/Clinical trials/Randomized controlled trials"
    ],
    [
      "plos",
      "/Research and analysis methods/Clinical trials/Randomized controlled trials"
    ],
    [
      "plos",
      "/Research and analysis methods/Database and informatics methods/Database searching"
    ],
    [
      "plos",
      "/Research and analysis methods/Research assessment/Peer review"
    ],
    [
      "plos",
      "/Research and analysis methods/Research assessment/Research reporting guidelines"
    ],
    [
      "plos",
      "/Research and analysis methods/Research assessment/Systematic reviews"
    ],
    [
      "plos",
      "/Research and analysis methods/Research design"
    ],
    [
      "plos",
      "/Social sciences/Psychology/Cognitive psychology/Decision making"
    ]
  ],
  "openalex": "W7222695357",
  "pdf_url": "https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014841&type=printable",
  "pmcid": "PMC13674756",
  "pmid": null,
  "published": "2026-10-01",
  "publisher": "Public Library of Science",
  "ris": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/9ft9xmr2mjr16.ris",
  "sources": [
    {
      "first_seen": "2026-10-30T12:17:23Z",
      "native_id": "10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014841",
      "source": "plos",
      "url": "https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014841"
    },
    {
      "first_seen": "2026-10-30T12:18:29Z",
      "native_id": "PMC:PMC13674756",
      "source": "europepmc",
      "url": "https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13674756"
    }
  ],
  "subjects": [
    {
      "field": "biology",
      "origin": "plos:neuroscience",
      "subfield": "neuroscience"
    },
    {
      "field": "medicine",
      "origin": "plos:clinical trials",
      "subfield": "clinical-trials"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Ten simple rules for developing a reporting appraisal tool",
  "title_text": "Ten simple rules for developing a reporting appraisal tool",
  "type": "peer-reviewed",
  "updated_at": "2026-10-30T12:18:29Z",
  "url": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/9ft9xmr2mjr16",
  "venue": "PLOS Computational Biology",
  "versions": []
}