{
  "abstract": "In degraded croplands, removal of the stressor, improvement in soil properties, and recovery of plant performance are often temporally decoupled. This asynchrony influences restoration outcomes but does not, by itself, demonstrate hysteresis. This mini review examines hydraulic and nutrient-sorption hysteresis alongside structural, biogeochemical, and microbial legacies that constrain root water and nutrient uptake. Controlled salinity–sodicity experiments resolve degradation and recovery branches of hydraulic conductivity, while phosphate studies demonstrate sorption–desorption asymmetry and effects of prior fertilization on plant response. Field studies of compaction, erosion, and acidification provide complementary evidence of incomplete recovery or intervention-dependent crop responses. We distinguish these findings from demonstrations of coupled plant–soil hysteresis. Recovery assessment requires paired measurements of the limiting soil process and plant resource acquisition, appropriate reference conditions, and explicit accounting for treatment duration and current inputs. Published concentration boundaries and response breakpoints illustrate process-specific constraints rather than universal restoration thresholds. An evidence-based diagnostic framework links the remaining constraint to intervention choice and guides tests of whether recovered function persists under renewed stress or reduced compensatory inputs.",
  "abstract_shown": true,
  "affiliations": [],
  "article_type": "Mini Review",
  "arxiv": null,
  "author_total": 5,
  "authors": [
    {
      "name": "Szilvia Kisvarga"
    },
    {
      "name": "Katalin Horotán"
    },
    {
      "name": "Zsanett Istvánfi"
    },
    {
      "name": "Mohamed Zyad Mohamed Elsadek"
    },
    {
      "name": "László Orlóci"
    }
  ],
  "bibtex": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/9rbcc846yf75b.bib",
  "cited_by": 0,
  "doi": "10.3389/fpls.2026.2004974",
  "fulltext_url": null,
  "id": "9rbcc846yf75b",
  "issns": [
    "1664-462X"
  ],
  "landing_url": "https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2026.2004974",
  "language": null,
  "licence": "CC-BY-4.0",
  "licence_label": "CC BY 4.0",
  "licence_source": "journal",
  "licence_url": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "metadata_licence": null,
  "native_subjects": [
    [
      "feed-journal",
      "biology/plant-biology"
    ]
  ],
  "openalex": null,
  "pdf_url": null,
  "pmcid": null,
  "pmid": null,
  "published": "2026-11-09",
  "publisher": null,
  "ris": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/9rbcc846yf75b.ris",
  "sources": [
    {
      "first_seen": "2026-11-09T18:20:18Z",
      "native_id": "10.3389/fpls.2026.2004974",
      "source": "feed-frontiers",
      "url": "https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2026.2004974"
    }
  ],
  "subjects": [
    {
      "field": "biology",
      "origin": "feed-journal:biology/plant-biology",
      "subfield": "plant-biology"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Cropland recovery after degradation: soil legacies, nutrient constraints and evidence for hysteresis",
  "title_text": "Cropland recovery after degradation: soil legacies, nutrient constraints and evidence for hysteresis",
  "type": "peer-reviewed",
  "updated_at": "2026-11-09T18:20:18Z",
  "url": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/9rbcc846yf75b",
  "venue": "Frontiers in Plant Science",
  "versions": []
}