{
  "abstract": "SAE Relation Theory Paper 6. This record holds the Chinese text and its English edition. The English edition is an independent rewrite of the Chinese text, not a translation; where the two differ, the Chinese governs. Each text comes with a quotation audit table.\n\nThis paper reads three things in a relation: how asymmetry enters collision; what continues after divergence and repair; and, once a relation has ended, what continues and what does not.\n\nAsymmetry in itself is not crossing the line. This paper reads only how asymmetries of capacity, knowledge and expression enter collision; the authority that comes with a position is acknowledged but not judged; asymmetry between a person and a construct is not read. Asymmetry used to cross the two boundaries of basic rights is violation; asymmetry used outward to seal the other party's channels, or to make them hard to travel, carries the direction of colonization; operations that substantively compress the other party's channels are handed over as the Conflict Treatise directs, and the two grades are not jumped.\n\nA conflict is handled as the Conflict Treatise handles it, and this paper does not rewrite that. Repair keeps two ledgers in parallel: making up does not settle the conflict, nor does an unresolved conflict leave the harm hanging; a reconciliation cannot accomplish either party's exit.\n\nEnding does not presuppose that every relation ought to be repaired or to endure. Unilateral exit does not settle the accounts; a relation may be terminated and a channel closed, but one cannot on that account pass final judgment on this person. Withdrawing one's own side is exit, and it does not carry the direction of colonization, even if the other party's cost rises as a result; when one party exits, whichever party acts outward, adding consequences, using the occasion to apply pressure and calling on others to isolate him all carry the direction of colonization. Exit does not delete recognition; the act of exit is the leaver's own choice, and it does actually change the other party's conditions, but this is read as inward and does not carry the direction of colonization; saying it out loud, and thereby characterizing this exit for the other party, slides in the direction of colonization. What continues after parting can be the conditions and effects that still exist; shared matters that remain after parting are not settled by unilateral exit; leaving room for natural development when one exits points in the direction of cultivation; neither staying nor leaving certifies cultivation.\n\nSAE 关系论 Paper 6。本记录收中文正文与英文版;英文版是独立重写,不是翻译,两版不一致处以中文为准。两版各附引文审计表。\n\n这一篇读一段关系里的三件事:不对称怎样进入碰撞,分歧与修复以后什么继续,以及一段关系结束以后什么继续,什么不继续。\n\n不对称本身不是越线。这一篇只读能力、知识、表达上的不对称怎样进入碰撞;位置带来的权限,认而不判;人与构之间的不对称,不读。不对称被用来越过基础权利的两道边界的,是侵;被用来向外封住对方通道或把它弄得难走的,带殖民这个方向;实质压缩对方通道的操作照冲突论交接,两级不跳接。\n\n一件冲突照冲突论处理,这一篇不重写。修复两账并行:和好不结清冲突,冲突未了也不挂起伤害;和解不能替任何一方完成退出。\n\n结束不预设每段关系都应修复或存续。单方退出不结清;关系可以终止,通道可以关闭,不能因此终审这个人。收回自己这一侧,是退出,不带殖民这个方向,对方的成本因此上升也一样;一方退出的时候,无论哪一方向外做事,追加后果、借机施压、号召孤立,都带殖民这个方向。退出不删除承认;退出这个动作是走的人自己的选择,它实际改变对方的条件,照向内读,不带殖民这个方向;说出来替对方给这次退出定性,滑向殖民的方向。分开以后继续的,可以是仍存的条件与作用;分开以后仍在的共同的事,不以单方退出结清;退出时留出自然发展的空间,朝涵育这个方向;留下或离开,都不认证涵育。\n\nRelated works\n\nRelation: Cites · Resource type: Publication / Preprint · Scheme: DOI\n\n10.5281/zenodo.23541778\n\n10.5281/zenodo.23545024\n\n10.5281/zenodo.23545057\n\n10.5281/zenodo.23545076\n\n10.5281/zenodo.22313628\n\n10.5281/zenodo.23250387\n\n10.5281/zenodo.22970777\n\n10.5281/zenodo.22970781\n\n10.5281/zenodo.21405207\n\n10.5281/zenodo.22122819\n\n10.5281/zenodo.22731235\n\n10.5281/zenodo.22738709\n\n10.5281/zenodo.23271072",
  "abstract_shown": true,
  "affiliations": [],
  "article_type": null,
  "arxiv": null,
  "author_total": 1,
  "authors": [
    {
      "name": "Han Qin",
      "orcid": "0009-0009-9583-0018"
    }
  ],
  "bibtex": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/aee54hp0kjd9a.bib",
  "cited_by": 0,
  "doi": "10.5281/zenodo.23554944",
  "fulltext_url": null,
  "id": "aee54hp0kjd9a",
  "issns": [],
  "landing_url": "https://zenodo.org/records/23554944",
  "language": null,
  "licence": "CC-BY-4.0",
  "licence_label": "CC BY 4.0",
  "licence_source": "article",
  "licence_url": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "metadata_licence": null,
  "native_subjects": [],
  "openalex": null,
  "pdf_url": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/23554944/files/SAE_RelationTheory_P6_AsymmetryDivergenceAndEnding_EN_v1.1.pdf/content",
  "pmcid": null,
  "pmid": null,
  "published": "2026-10-22",
  "publisher": null,
  "ris": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/aee54hp0kjd9a.ris",
  "sources": [
    {
      "first_seen": "2026-11-05T12:20:47Z",
      "native_id": "23554944",
      "source": "zenodo",
      "url": "https://zenodo.org/records/23554944"
    }
  ],
  "subjects": [],
  "title": "SAE Relation Theory Paper 6: Asymmetry, Divergence and Ending / SAE 关系论 Paper 6: 不对称、分歧与结束",
  "title_text": "SAE Relation Theory Paper 6: Asymmetry, Divergence and Ending / SAE 关系论 Paper 6: 不对称、分歧与结束",
  "type": "preprint",
  "updated_at": "2026-11-05T12:20:47Z",
  "url": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/aee54hp0kjd9a",
  "venue": "Zenodo",
  "versions": []
}