{
  "abstract": "Single-cell differential expression analysis combines a gene-level statistic with a false discovery rate (FDR) procedure. We examine how these two choices affect error control and power by pairing four statistics with BH, e-BH, data-splitting mirror, and target–decoy procedures. The benchmark uses zero-inflated negative-binomial simulations and a donor-level model fitted to Kang18 control data, with known signal genes in both designs. We vary dropout, signal type, gene number, and cross-gene dependence. Higher dropout reduces power across all 16 combinations in the mean-shift experiment, whereas null FDR depends on the statistic and its tail calibration. Distribution-sensitive statistics detect equal-mean dispersion changes that mean-based statistics largely miss. The apparent power gain of data splitting and target–decoy at a larger gene count is not reproduced when the number of signals is held fixed. The working e-value is sensitive to null-score calibration, and donor dependence affects some procedures without a common monotone pattern. These results show why benchmark comparisons should separate the signal being tested, the calibration of the input evidence, and the multiple-testing rule.",
  "abstract_shown": true,
  "affiliations": [
    "Yunnan Key Laboratory of Statistical Modeling and Data Analysis, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China",
    "National Center for Mathematics and Interdisciplinary Sciences, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China",
    "School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China"
  ],
  "article_type": null,
  "arxiv": null,
  "author_total": 3,
  "authors": [
    {
      "affs": [
        0,
        1
      ],
      "name": "Bowen Duan",
      "orcid": "0000-0002-3508-7324"
    },
    {
      "affs": [
        0
      ],
      "name": "Qingmin Zhang"
    },
    {
      "affs": [
        1,
        2
      ],
      "name": "Peibo Hao"
    }
  ],
  "bibtex": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/aqwj924n88q16.bib",
  "cited_by": 0,
  "doi": "10.3390/math14203786",
  "fulltext_url": null,
  "id": "aqwj924n88q16",
  "issns": [
    "2227-7390"
  ],
  "landing_url": "https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/14/20/3786",
  "language": null,
  "licence": "CC-BY-4.0",
  "licence_label": "CC BY 4.0",
  "licence_source": "article",
  "licence_url": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "metadata_licence": null,
  "native_subjects": [
    [
      "openalex",
      "1312|Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics"
    ]
  ],
  "openalex": "W7222937824",
  "pdf_url": null,
  "pmcid": null,
  "pmid": null,
  "published": "2026-10-19",
  "publisher": "MDPI AG",
  "ris": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/aqwj924n88q16.ris",
  "sources": [
    {
      "first_seen": "2026-10-30T12:18:29Z",
      "native_id": "10.3390/math14203786",
      "source": "crossref",
      "url": "https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/14/20/3786"
    }
  ],
  "subjects": [
    {
      "field": "biochemistry",
      "origin": "openalex:1312|Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics",
      "subfield": "molecular-biology"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Benchmarking Test Statistics and False Discovery Rate Procedures for Single-Cell Differential Expression",
  "title_text": "Benchmarking Test Statistics and False Discovery Rate Procedures for Single-Cell Differential Expression",
  "type": "peer-reviewed",
  "updated_at": "2026-10-30T12:18:29Z",
  "url": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/aqwj924n88q16",
  "venue": "Mathematics",
  "versions": []
}