{
  "abstract": "Background\n\nDigital technologies are increasingly used to extend post-stroke rehabilitation and recovery support beyond conventional face-to-face services. However, the evidence remains heterogeneous in delivery, intervention content, and outcomes assessed.Purpose\n\nTo map the delivery method, intervention content, and reported outcomes of digital interventions supporting post-stroke rehabilitation and recovery.Methods\n\nThis scoping review followed the Arksey and O'Malley framework and PRISMA-ScR. PubMed, Scopus, EBSCOhost, Taylor and Francis Online, and ScienceDirect were searched, with the final search conducted on 26 January 2026, supplemented by manual searches of relevant reference lists. Eligible studies included adults aged ≥18 years post-stroke and digital interventions supporting rehabilitation or recovery. We extracted and analyzed 21 source-verified studies descriptively and narratively.Results\n\nDelivery methods were mapped using a two-dimensional framework. Based on the level of professional interaction, studies were classified as clinician-supported remote rehabilitation (n=8), hybrid or clinician-facilitated digital rehabilitation (n=9), or primarily self-directed or patient-facing interventions (n=4). The technological mechanisms were considered non-mutually exclusive and included digital content or applications, telecommunication, virtual reality or exergaming, wearable or motion-sensing technologies, physiological monitoring, automated feedback or cueing, and remote data monitoring. Intervention content was mapped to motor and mobility exercises, stroke education and self-management, balance and postural training, and task-oriented training or occupational therapy; one study reported remote functional assessment rather than active rehabilitation content (n=1). Reported outcomes were categorized into physical and functional outcomes; emotional, behavioral, and patient-reported outcomes; cognitive and knowledge outcomes; and clinical and health outcomes.Conclusion\n\nDigital post-stroke interventions comprise diverse combinations of professional support, technological mechanisms, rehabilitation content, and outcomes. The evidence is best interpreted as a descriptive map rather than confirmation of effectiveness. Future studies should more clearly specify intervention components, standardize outcome assessment where appropriate, and examine long-term feasibility, accessibility, and scalability.",
  "abstract_shown": true,
  "affiliations": [
    "Doctoral Program, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, West Java, Indonesia.",
    "Department of Community Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, West Java, Indonesia.",
    "Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, West Java, Indonesia.",
    "Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, West Java, Indonesia."
  ],
  "article_type": "review article",
  "arxiv": null,
  "author_total": 4,
  "authors": [
    {
      "affs": [
        0
      ],
      "name": "Agus Prasetyo"
    },
    {
      "affs": [
        1
      ],
      "name": "Iqbal Pramukti",
      "orcid": "0000-0002-0645-0534"
    },
    {
      "affs": [
        2
      ],
      "name": "Titis Kurniawan"
    },
    {
      "affs": [
        3
      ],
      "name": "Emilliano Emilliano"
    }
  ],
  "bibtex": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/dy1sz46mdyygn.bib",
  "cited_by": 0,
  "doi": "10.2147/jmdh.s629116",
  "fulltext_url": "https://europepmc.org/articles/PMC13695938",
  "id": "dy1sz46mdyygn",
  "issns": [
    "1178-2390"
  ],
  "landing_url": "https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42928784",
  "language": "eng",
  "licence": "CC-BY-NC",
  "licence_label": "CC BY-NC",
  "licence_source": "article",
  "licence_url": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/",
  "metadata_licence": null,
  "native_subjects": [
    [
      "openalex",
      "2742|Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery"
    ]
  ],
  "openalex": "W7223070134",
  "pdf_url": "https://europepmc.org/articles/PMC13695938?pdf=render",
  "pmcid": "PMC13695938",
  "pmid": "42928784",
  "published": "2026-10-21",
  "publisher": null,
  "ris": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/dy1sz46mdyygn.ris",
  "sources": [
    {
      "first_seen": "2026-10-30T12:21:18Z",
      "native_id": "MED:42928784",
      "source": "europepmc",
      "url": "https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42928784"
    }
  ],
  "subjects": [
    {
      "field": "medicine",
      "origin": "openalex:2742|Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery",
      "subfield": "general"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Digital Interventions for Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review of Delivery Method, Content, and Outcome.",
  "title_text": "Digital Interventions for Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review of Delivery Method, Content, and Outcome.",
  "type": "peer-reviewed",
  "updated_at": "2026-10-30T12:21:18Z",
  "url": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/dy1sz46mdyygn",
  "venue": "Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare",
  "versions": []
}