{
  "abstract": "Assertions about collider classifiers require observable evidence and a specified deployment reference. We distinguish the classification threshold that selects events from the claim threshold that defines acceptable performance. For fixed nominal-weighted ratio claims on a frozen finite population, we apply established assorter reductions and bounded-mean confidence sequences under independent sampling with replacement and a predeclared weight bound. The anytime-valid error control is per claim, not automatically simultaneous across claims, and is not a new statistical guarantee. In 19,680 archived paired audit-stream comparisons, changing unweighted correctness and its source reference to nominal-weighted accuracy and its own reference changed 536 supported verdicts to unresolved and 226 in the reverse direction. Scores, labels, weights and exact ratios were available before these simulated audits; their stopping times demonstrate no operational acquisition saving. A post hoc analysis of 30 finite-shot quantum-kernel realizations, with paired RAW and diagonal-loading treatments, describes sensitivity to operating rules, ideal versus realized references, and fixed versus recomposed margin groups. Verdict differences are not auditor error rates, and no quantum-specific mechanism or quantum advantage is established. A CMS open-data example supports restricted aggregate statements while event-level accuracy remains unidentified. This substantial revision withdraws the previous physical-interval coverage conclusions following numerical-validation problems; the available reevaluation does not reestablish them. The retained contribution is mathematical exposition and descriptive evidence, without methodological-priority or calibrated physical-inference claims.",
  "abstract_shown": true,
  "affiliations": [],
  "article_type": null,
  "arxiv": "2609.02781",
  "author_total": 4,
  "authors": [
    {
      "name": "Roberto Fernández-Barrios"
    },
    {
      "name": "Iker Pastor-López"
    },
    {
      "name": "Asier González-Santocildes"
    },
    {
      "name": "Pablo García Bringas"
    }
  ],
  "bibtex": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/e27w5ne41x70h.bib",
  "cited_by": 0,
  "doi": "10.48550/arxiv.2609.02781",
  "fulltext_url": null,
  "id": "e27w5ne41x70h",
  "issns": [],
  "landing_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02781",
  "language": null,
  "licence": "LicenseRef-arXiv-nonexclusive-1.0",
  "licence_label": "arXiv licence",
  "licence_source": "article",
  "licence_url": "http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/",
  "metadata_licence": "CC0-1.0",
  "native_subjects": [
    [
      "arxiv",
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    [
      "openalex",
      "1702|Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture"
    ]
  ],
  "openalex": "W7207677962",
  "pdf_url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.02781",
  "pmcid": null,
  "pmid": null,
  "published": "2026-09-02",
  "publisher": null,
  "ris": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/e27w5ne41x70h.ris",
  "sources": [
    {
      "first_seen": "2026-10-30T12:18:16Z",
      "native_id": "2609.02781",
      "source": "arxiv",
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02781"
    }
  ],
  "subjects": [
    {
      "field": "physics",
      "origin": "arxiv:quant-ph",
      "subfield": "quantum"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Conditional validity of quantum event classifiers under collider systematics and quantum estimation uncertainty",
  "title_text": "Conditional validity of quantum event classifiers under collider systematics and quantum estimation uncertainty",
  "type": "preprint",
  "updated_at": "2026-11-04T15:20:50Z",
  "url": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/e27w5ne41x70h",
  "venue": "arXiv",
  "versions": []
}