{
  "abstract": "Weak instruments are a well-known limitation for valid causal inference in Mendelian randomization studies. In the single exposure setting, weak instrument bias can be mitigated by selecting genetic instruments which are strongly associated with the exposure according to p-value and/or F-statistic thresholds. However, in the multi-exposure setting, genetic instruments may be strongly associated with an exposure but weakly associated with it conditional on all other exposures in the analysis. It is therefore more difficult to guarantee conditionally strong instruments in multivariable Mendelian randomization. Weak instrument bias can be mitigated using modeling approaches; however, there are fewer methods for doing this in the multivariable case compared with the single exposure case. In this paper, we consider a method for mitigating weak instrument bias in multivariable Mendelian randomization using a Bayesian framework: MVMR-Pony. We compare this method with existing frequentist methods. We show using simulation studies that the MVMR-Pony method outperforms the frequentist approaches with respect to bias, coverage, Type I error rates, and power, across settings where weak instrument bias arises due to correlated genetic effects, measurement error, and mediation.",
  "abstract_shown": true,
  "affiliations": [
    "Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.",
    "MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.",
    "Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK."
  ],
  "article_type": "research article",
  "arxiv": null,
  "author_total": 3,
  "authors": [
    {
      "affs": [
        0
      ],
      "name": "Andrew J Grant",
      "orcid": "0000-0001-6422-583X"
    },
    {
      "affs": [
        1
      ],
      "name": "Ashish Patel",
      "orcid": "0000-0002-0350-4365"
    },
    {
      "affs": [
        1,
        2
      ],
      "name": "Stephen Burgess",
      "orcid": "0000-0001-5365-8760"
    }
  ],
  "bibtex": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/eq7jcrmbcdfxj.bib",
  "cited_by": 0,
  "doi": "10.1002/sim.70788",
  "fulltext_url": "https://europepmc.org/articles/PMC13678027",
  "id": "eq7jcrmbcdfxj",
  "issns": [
    "0277-6715",
    "1097-0258"
  ],
  "landing_url": "https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42894289",
  "language": "eng",
  "licence": "CC-BY",
  "licence_label": "CC BY",
  "licence_source": "article",
  "licence_url": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "metadata_licence": null,
  "native_subjects": [
    [
      "openalex",
      "1311|Genetic Associations and Epidemiology"
    ]
  ],
  "openalex": "W7166082598",
  "pdf_url": "https://europepmc.org/articles/PMC13678027?pdf=render",
  "pmcid": "PMC13678027",
  "pmid": "42894289",
  "published": "2026-10-01",
  "publisher": null,
  "ris": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/eq7jcrmbcdfxj.ris",
  "sources": [
    {
      "first_seen": "2026-10-30T12:19:37Z",
      "native_id": "MED:42894289",
      "source": "europepmc",
      "url": "https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42894289"
    }
  ],
  "subjects": [
    {
      "field": "biology",
      "origin": "openalex:1311|Genetic Associations and Epidemiology",
      "subfield": "genetics-genomics"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Multivariable Mendelian Randomization With Weak Instruments: A Comparison of Bayesian and Frequentist Methods.",
  "title_text": "Multivariable Mendelian Randomization With Weak Instruments: A Comparison of Bayesian and Frequentist Methods.",
  "type": "peer-reviewed",
  "updated_at": "2026-10-30T12:19:37Z",
  "url": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/eq7jcrmbcdfxj",
  "venue": "Statistics in medicine",
  "versions": []
}