{
  "abstract": "TESS Objects of Interest (TOIs) seen as single or duo transits carry a catalogue period that is undefined or equal to the separation of the two events, and their insolation and any habitable-zone label inherit it. We reanalyse all 187 TOIs catalogued with P = 0 or P >= 200 d using all public TESS data through Sector 107, with a flux-based method that weights each alias by per-epoch transit likelihoods, the transit duration and a geometric prior, and tests for coherence, data edges, contamination by other planets and instrumental artefacts. It recovers 12 published periods blindly and, in injection-recovery tests, 71 per cent of periods constrained by a new transit, with no wrong period. It resolves 28 periods and fixes 8 more by exclusion. Are habitable-zone TOIs really there? Mostly not: of the 28 duo-transits that a catalogue-period criterion places in the conservative habitable zone, about two are expected to lie there, both giants, and none of the 12 planet-sized ones; those resolved are aliases of hotter planets. Conversely, habitable-zone planets hide behind missing or wrong periods: we recover three published M-dwarf examples and validate four planets with new periods, including TOI-2298 b, a 3.0 Earth-radius sub-Neptune at 146.58 d in the conservative habitable zone of a K dwarf, and TOI-6075 b, a 1.7 Earth-radius planet at 416.5 d (833 d not excluded), the second validated transiting planet smaller than 2 Earth radii with P > 1 yr. We release alias-marginalised habitable-zone probabilities for the whole sample.",
  "abstract_shown": true,
  "affiliations": [],
  "article_type": null,
  "arxiv": "2611.03019",
  "author_total": 1,
  "authors": [
    {
      "name": "Juan F. Pagés Navarrete"
    }
  ],
  "bibtex": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/evp9kvawwkfam.bib",
  "cited_by": 0,
  "doi": "10.48550/arxiv.2611.03019",
  "fulltext_url": null,
  "id": "evp9kvawwkfam",
  "issns": [],
  "landing_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.03019",
  "language": null,
  "licence": "CC-BY-4.0",
  "licence_label": "CC BY 4.0",
  "licence_source": "article",
  "licence_url": "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "metadata_licence": "CC0-1.0",
  "native_subjects": [
    [
      "arxiv",
      "astro-ph.EP"
    ],
    [
      "arxiv",
      "astro-ph.IM"
    ]
  ],
  "openalex": null,
  "pdf_url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2611.03019",
  "pmcid": null,
  "pmid": null,
  "published": "2026-11-02",
  "publisher": null,
  "ris": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/evp9kvawwkfam.ris",
  "sources": [
    {
      "first_seen": "2026-11-03T12:20:59Z",
      "native_id": "2611.03019",
      "source": "arxiv",
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.03019"
    }
  ],
  "subjects": [
    {
      "field": "astronomy",
      "origin": "arxiv:astro-ph.IM",
      "subfield": "instrumentation-methods"
    },
    {
      "field": "astronomy",
      "origin": "arxiv:astro-ph.EP",
      "subfield": "planetary"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Are habitable-zone TESS Objects of Interest really there? Period resolution from the full archive",
  "title_text": "Are habitable-zone TESS Objects of Interest really there? Period resolution from the full archive",
  "type": "preprint",
  "updated_at": "2026-11-05T15:20:18Z",
  "url": "https://research.draconitic.com/paper/evp9kvawwkfam",
  "venue": "arXiv",
  "versions": []
}