Interacting effects of human presence and landscape modification on birds and mammals
40 affiliations
- 1Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
- 2Center for Biodiversity and Global Change, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
- 3Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
- 4Migratory Bird Center, Smithsonian’s National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Washington, DC, USA
- 5School of Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- 6Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
- 7Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
- 8Centre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
- 9Biodiversity Pathways Ltd., Calgary, AB, Canada
- 10Department of Biology, University of British Columbia, Okanagan, BC, Canada
- 11Department of Wildland Resources and the Ecology Center, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA
- 12Hawk Mountain Sanctuary, Orwigsburg, PA, USA
- 13Waterfowl and Upland Gamebird Center, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA
- 14Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
- 15US Fish and Wildlife Service, Migratory Bird Program, Reno, NV, USA
- 16Cooperative Wildlife Research Lab, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, USA
- 17Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
- 18School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
- 19Département de Biologie and Centre d’études nordiques, Université du Québec à Rimouski, Rimouski, QC, Canada
- 20Department of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, West Montreal, QC, Canada
- 21Hancock Wildlife Foundation, Surrey, BC, Canada
- 22Missouri Department of Conservation, Columbia, MO, USA
- 23United States Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Dixon Field Station, Dixon, CA, USA
- 24Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
- 25Cesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, TX, USA
- 26School of Renewable Natural Resources, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
- 27Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Jackson, WY, USA
- 28Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
- 29Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Department of Animal Migration, Radolfzell, Germany
- 30The Ohio State University, Department of Civil, Environmental and Geodetic Engineering, Columbus, USA
- 31Division of Wildlife Resources, Utah Department of Natural Resources, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- 32Field Engine Wildlife Research and Management, East Haddam, CT, USA
- 33Biodiversity Research Institute, Portland, ME, USA
- 34Department of Biology, Angelo State University, San Angelo, TX, USA
- 35Départment des sciences expérimentales, Université de Saint-Boniface, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- 36Panthera, New York, NY, USA
- 37Applied Animal Biology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- 38Environment and Climate Change Canada, Delta, BC, Canada
- 39US Dept of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Gainesville, FL, USA
- 40United States Geological Survey Virginia Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
Abstract
Sustainable human-wildlife coexistence requires a mechanistic understanding of the many ways that humans affect animals. However, progress is hampered by the lack of accessible data measuring the dynamic presence of people. Here, we leverage mobile-device data to disentangle how human presence and landscape modification differentially influence the use of geographic and environmental space for 37 mammal and bird species across the United States. Human presence affected more than 65% of species, with substantial variation across species. For ~60% of species that responded to human activities, the effects were interdependent-animals tended to react more strongly to human presence in less modified habitats. Our results demonstrate that human presence and landscape modification have complex combined effects on wildlife, which need to be considered for effective management.
Related
- First insights into the miRNA landscape of Tursiops truncatus milk reveal shared dominant microRNA families with terrestrial mammals
- Plants and mammals once tracked climate closely, then mammal niches shifted under human pressure
- Mapping potential for human encounters with dangerous large mammals across a community-led Wildlife Management Area in southern Tanzania based on overlapping signs of recent activity
- One-step glycan photoaffinity probe synthesis enables identification of human milk oligosaccharide-interacting microbiota
- Three-dimensional printing of human scala tympani models: surface modification to reduce cochlear implant insertion forces with a physiological lubricant
BibTeX
@article{oliver2026interacting,
title = {{Interacting effects of human presence and landscape modification on birds and mammals}},
author = {Ruth Y. Oliver and Scott W. Yanco and Diego Ellis‐Soto and Brett R. Jesmer and Juliet Cohen and Song Gao and Robert Patchett and Tal Avgar and Keith L. Bildstein and Nicholas W. Bakner and David R. Barber and Kristin J. Barker and Joseph G. Barnes and Guillaume Bastille‐Rousseau and Jerrold L. Belant and John F. Benson and Joël Bêty and Dean E. Beyer and David M. Bird and Nathaniel R. Bowersock and Andy J. Boyce and Ben Carlson and Michael L. Casazza and Michael J. Chamberlain and Michael J. Cherry and Bret A. Collier and Alyson B. Courtemanch and Sarah C. Davidson and Darren DeBloois and Vickie L. DeNicola and Christopher R. DeSorbo and Robert C. Dowler and Daniel L. J. Dupont and L. Mark Elbroch and John E. Elliott and Betsy A. Evans and William Mark Ford and David Hancock and Molly Hardesty‐Moore and Jason E. Hawley and Mackenzie R. Jeffress and Scott Jennings and Matthew J. Kauffman and Roland Kays and Marcella J. Kelly and Bryan M. Kluever and Myles Lamont and Scott D. LaPoint and Tayler N. LaSharr and Josée Lefebvre and Pierre Legagneux and Matthias-Claudio Loretto and David Lumpkin and Lindsay A. Martinez and John M. Marzluff and Douglas J. McCauley and Fiona P Mcduie and Tony W. Mong and Kevin L. Monteith and Thomas Mueller},
journal = {Science},
year = {2026},
month = may,
doi = {10.1126/science.adq3396},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adq3396},
note = {Public domain},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Interacting effects of human presence and landscape modification on birds and mammals
AU - Ruth Y. Oliver
AU - Scott W. Yanco
AU - Diego Ellis‐Soto
AU - Brett R. Jesmer
AU - Juliet Cohen
AU - Song Gao
AU - Robert Patchett
AU - Tal Avgar
AU - Keith L. Bildstein
AU - Nicholas W. Bakner
AU - David R. Barber
AU - Kristin J. Barker
AU - Joseph G. Barnes
AU - Guillaume Bastille‐Rousseau
AU - Jerrold L. Belant
AU - John F. Benson
AU - Joël Bêty
AU - Dean E. Beyer
AU - David M. Bird
AU - Nathaniel R. Bowersock
AU - Andy J. Boyce
AU - Ben Carlson
AU - Michael L. Casazza
AU - Michael J. Chamberlain
AU - Michael J. Cherry
AU - Bret A. Collier
AU - Alyson B. Courtemanch
AU - Sarah C. Davidson
AU - Darren DeBloois
AU - Vickie L. DeNicola
AU - Christopher R. DeSorbo
AU - Robert C. Dowler
AU - Daniel L. J. Dupont
AU - L. Mark Elbroch
AU - John E. Elliott
AU - Betsy A. Evans
AU - William Mark Ford
AU - David Hancock
AU - Molly Hardesty‐Moore
AU - Jason E. Hawley
AU - Mackenzie R. Jeffress
AU - Scott Jennings
AU - Matthew J. Kauffman
AU - Roland Kays
AU - Marcella J. Kelly
AU - Bryan M. Kluever
AU - Myles Lamont
AU - Scott D. LaPoint
AU - Tayler N. LaSharr
AU - Josée Lefebvre
AU - Pierre Legagneux
AU - Matthias-Claudio Loretto
AU - David Lumpkin
AU - Lindsay A. Martinez
AU - John M. Marzluff
AU - Douglas J. McCauley
AU - Fiona P Mcduie
AU - Tony W. Mong
AU - Kevin L. Monteith
AU - Thomas Mueller
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/05/21
JO - Science
DO - 10.1126/science.adq3396
UR - https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adq3396
AB - Sustainable human-wildlife coexistence requires a mechanistic understanding of the many ways that humans affect animals. However, progress is hampered by the lack of accessible data measuring the dynamic presence of people. Here, we leverage mobile-device data to disentangle how human presence and landscape modification differentially influence the use of geographic and environmental space for 37 mammal and bird species across the United States. Human presence affected more than 65% of species, with substantial variation across species. For ~60% of species that responded to human activities, the effects were interdependent-animals tended to react more strongly to human presence in less modified habitats. Our results demonstrate that human presence and landscape modification have complex combined effects on wildlife, which need to be considered for effective management.
SN - 0036-8075
SN - 0193-4511
SN - 1095-9203
ER -