Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
193,349 studies31 sourcesUpdated 55 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJournal of Patient Experience

Optimizing the Patient Experience Through Clinician Coaching or Communication Intervention: A Randomized Pilot Study

Abstract

Purpose Patient experience is an indicator of health care quality, yet evidence for efficient, scalable interventions in primary care is limited. This randomized pilot study examined whether individualized patient experience coaching or a communication class improved patient experience scores compared with no intervention. Clinician burnout was explored as a secondary outcome. Methods Primary care clinicians with “Likelihood-to-Recommend” scores below the 90 th percentile were randomized to individualized coaching, a communication class, or no intervention. Patient experience scores were analyzed for up to one year after the intervention using generalized linear mixed models. Burnout was measured at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and two months later using the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Key Findings Nineteen clinicians completed the study. Composite Top Box Scores improved significantly in the coaching group compared with the control (p=0.006). Improvements in the communication class group did not reach statistical significance (p=0.12). Burnout analyses were limited by low post-intervention response rates. Implications Individualized coaching may improve patient experience scores and offer feasible strategies for enhancing patient experience in primary care.

Related

  1. The Need for Clinician Communication Strategies for Eating Disorders/Insulin Restriction in Type 1 Diabetes
    Heather L. Stuckey, Candace R. Bordner, Amie L. Prokop +3
    AACE Endocrinology and DiabetesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthPMC
  2. Communication during high-stakes ICU family–clinician interactions: a realist review protocol
    Arun Ghoshal, Ashmitha Prasad, Aparna Nanda +1
    Systematic ReviewsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Clinical trials & evidence synthesisCrossref
  3. Using Vision and Large Language Models for Psychological Intervention Competency Assessment: A Pilot Study of Agreement with Clinician Ratings
    Y. Liu, W. Leever, M. Stanco +7
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  4. Clinician Communication Behaviors and Perceived Health Care Discrimination Among Black Patients
    Ebiere D. Okah, Nao Hagiwara, Kelly Robinson +2
    JAMA Network OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  5. Qualitative clinician feedback on a systematic urinary incontinence screening and patient education intervention in primary care
    Tiffany Brown, Stephen D Persell, Kimberly Kenton +5
    BMJ Open QualityPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{jenniferabolddnp2026optimizing,
  title = {{Optimizing the Patient Experience Through Clinician Coaching or Communication Intervention: A Randomized Pilot Study}},
  author = {Jennifer A. Bold DNP, APRN, FNP-BC and Chad Fritsche and Natalie M. Averkamp MS and Crystal Hilger-Feeser DNP, APRN and Jill M. Smith MSN, APRN, CNP and Eric Nelson MA and Renee Weatherly and Summer V. Allen MD},
  journal = {Journal of Patient Experience},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1177/23743735261503094},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735261503094},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Optimizing the Patient Experience Through Clinician Coaching or Communication Intervention: A Randomized Pilot Study
AU  - Jennifer A. Bold DNP, APRN, FNP-BC
AU  - Chad Fritsche
AU  - Natalie M. Averkamp MS
AU  - Crystal Hilger-Feeser DNP, APRN
AU  - Jill M. Smith MSN, APRN, CNP
AU  - Eric Nelson MA
AU  - Renee Weatherly
AU  - Summer V. Allen MD
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/04
JO  - Journal of Patient Experience
DO  - 10.1177/23743735261503094
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735261503094
AB  - Purpose Patient experience is an indicator of health care quality, yet evidence for efficient, scalable interventions in primary care is limited. This randomized pilot study examined whether individualized patient experience coaching or a communication class improved patient experience scores compared with no intervention. Clinician burnout was explored as a secondary outcome. Methods Primary care clinicians with “Likelihood-to-Recommend” scores below the 90 th percentile were randomized to individualized coaching, a communication class, or no intervention. Patient experience scores were analyzed for up to one year after the intervention using generalized linear mixed models. Burnout was measured at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and two months later using the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Key Findings Nineteen clinicians completed the study. Composite Top Box Scores improved significantly in the coaching group compared with the control (p=0.006). Improvements in the communication class group did not reach statistical significance (p=0.12). Burnout analyses were limited by low post-intervention response rates. Implications Individualized coaching may improve patient experience scores and offer feasible strategies for enhancing patient experience in primary care.
SN  - 2374-3743
SN  - 2374-3735
ER  -