Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,230 studies31 sourcesUpdated 20 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYBMC Gastroenterology

Diagnostic performance of GAAD, PIVKA-II and AFP in hepatocellular carcinoma, chronic liver disease and healthy population: evidence from a Malaysian cohort

5 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Chemical Pathology, School of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia
  2. 2Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia
  3. 3Department of Radiology, School of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia
  4. 4School of Dental Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia
  5. 5Department of Medical Education, School of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia

Abstract

Background The aim of the current study was to evaluate the diagnostic performances of GAAD score, PIVKA-II and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance in HCC, chronic liver disease (CLD) and healthy controls (HC) subjects from the northeastern Peninsular Malaysia. Methods This was a single-center cross-sectional study. The GAAD value was calculated using the Elecsys® GAAD calculator. Serum PIVKA-II and AFP levels were measured using the Elecsys® electrochemiluminescence immunoassay method. Diagnostic performance of these tests were evaluated based on area under the curve (AUC), optimal cutoff levels, sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Results Of the 128 enrolled subjects,99 were included (33 HCC, 33 CLD, and 33 HC). GAAD score, PIVKA-II, and AFP levels were significantly higher in patients with HCC than in those with CLD and HC (all p < 0.05). For differentiating HCC from CLD, GAAD at a cutoff of 2.57 demonstrated the highest Se (81.8%) and Sp (72.7%), with an AUC of 0.873 (95% CI 0.791–0.955). PIVKA-II at a cut-off of 28.4 ng/mL showed Se and Sp of 75.8% and 69.7%, respectively, with an AUC of 0.842 (95% CI 0.748–0.936). AFP at a cutoff of 20 ng/mL demonstrated lower Se (51.5%) but higher Sp (90.9%), with an AUC of 0.834 (95% CI 0.730–0.938). For differentiating HCC from HC, GAAD and PIVKA-II achieved 100% Sp and PPV, whereas AFP maintained 100% Sp but lower Se (51.52%). Overall, GAAD exhibited the best balance of sensitivity and specificity for HCC detection, while PIVKA-II provided complementary diagnostic value due to its high specificity. Conclusion The GAAD score demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared with both PIVKA-II and AFP in differentiating HCC from CLD and HC subjects, supporting its potential utility in HCC surveillance. In addition, PIVKA-II showed better diagnostic performance than AFP.

Related

  1. Diagnostic Performance of cfDNA-Based Liquid Biopsy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Jiwei Liu, Yangyu Zhang, Shuo Yang +2
    Cancer sciencePeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textOncologyEurope PMC
  2. Synchronous hepatocellular carcinoma and IPNB-associated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in a patient with resolved viral hepatitis: a case report of diagnostic pitfall and margin-negative resection
    Tong Zhou, Shuqing Wu, Tianze Guo +3
    Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaCrossref
  3. PIVKA-II and hematological parameters in hepatocellular carcinoma and non-malignant chronic liver disease: A case-control biomarker comparison in a hepatitis-endemic population
    Muhammad Sameer Hashmi, Muhammad Aqif Ilyas
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral biochemistryCell biologyPLOSPMC
  4. Comparison of Internal Validation Strategies for Estimating Machine Learning Model Performance in One-Year Mortality Prediction in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Zeynep Kucukakcali, Sami Akbulut, Kemal Baris Sarici
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossrefEurope PMC
  5. Diagnostic performance of next-generation sequencing in thyroid nodules and molecular correlates of tumor aggressiveness in papillary thyroid carcinoma
    Songze Zhang, Nan Zhao, Lan Qin +1
    Frontiers in EndocrinologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEndocrinology & metabolismCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{noor2026diagnostic,
  title = {{Diagnostic performance of GAAD, PIVKA-II and AFP in hepatocellular carcinoma, chronic liver disease and healthy population: evidence from a Malaysian cohort}},
  author = {Rabiatul Adawiyyah Mohamad Noor and Nur Karyatee Kassim and Aniza Mohammed Jelani and Lee Yeong Yeh and Mohd Hafizuddin Husin and Wan Muhamad Amir W Ahmad and Nurhanis Syazni Roslan},
  journal = {BMC Gastroenterology},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1186/s12876-026-05140-6},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-026-05140-6},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Diagnostic performance of GAAD, PIVKA-II and AFP in hepatocellular carcinoma, chronic liver disease and healthy population: evidence from a Malaysian cohort
AU  - Rabiatul Adawiyyah Mohamad Noor
AU  - Nur Karyatee Kassim
AU  - Aniza Mohammed Jelani
AU  - Lee Yeong Yeh
AU  - Mohd Hafizuddin Husin
AU  - Wan Muhamad Amir W Ahmad
AU  - Nurhanis Syazni Roslan
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
JO  - BMC Gastroenterology
DO  - 10.1186/s12876-026-05140-6
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-026-05140-6
AB  - Background The aim of the current study was to evaluate the diagnostic performances of GAAD score, PIVKA-II and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance in HCC, chronic liver disease (CLD) and healthy controls (HC) subjects from the northeastern Peninsular Malaysia. Methods This was a single-center cross-sectional study. The GAAD value was calculated using the Elecsys® GAAD calculator. Serum PIVKA-II and AFP levels were measured using the Elecsys® electrochemiluminescence immunoassay method. Diagnostic performance of these tests were evaluated based on area under the curve (AUC), optimal cutoff levels, sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Results Of the 128 enrolled subjects,99 were included (33 HCC, 33 CLD, and 33 HC). GAAD score, PIVKA-II, and AFP levels were significantly higher in patients with HCC than in those with CLD and HC (all p < 0.05). For differentiating HCC from CLD, GAAD at a cutoff of 2.57 demonstrated the highest Se (81.8%) and Sp (72.7%), with an AUC of 0.873 (95% CI 0.791–0.955). PIVKA-II at a cut-off of 28.4 ng/mL showed Se and Sp of 75.8% and 69.7%, respectively, with an AUC of 0.842 (95% CI 0.748–0.936). AFP at a cutoff of 20 ng/mL demonstrated lower Se (51.5%) but higher Sp (90.9%), with an AUC of 0.834 (95% CI 0.730–0.938). For differentiating HCC from HC, GAAD and PIVKA-II achieved 100% Sp and PPV, whereas AFP maintained 100% Sp but lower Se (51.52%). Overall, GAAD exhibited the best balance of sensitivity and specificity for HCC detection, while PIVKA-II provided complementary diagnostic value due to its high specificity. Conclusion The GAAD score demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared with both PIVKA-II and AFP in differentiating HCC from CLD and HC subjects, supporting its potential utility in HCC surveillance. In addition, PIVKA-II showed better diagnostic performance than AFP.
SN  - 1471-230X
ER  -