When tics are not the whole story: rethinking clinical assessment in children with tic disorders
- 1Child Neurology and Psychiatry, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Viterbo
Abstract
Tic disorders are heterogeneous neurodevelopmental conditions in which observable tic severity does not necessarily reflect the difficulties that most affect the child’s everyday life. Premonitory sensations, pain, suppression effort, psychiatric symptoms, motor or sensory features, and executive vulnerabilities may contribute differently to clinical presentation and functional outcomes. In this Perspective, we propose a three-domain clinical framework that distinguishes: (1) observable tic phenomenology and severity; (2) subjective tic-related experience; and (3) the broader neurodevelopmental and psychiatric profile. The framework is intended as a clinical heuristic for organizing assessment and prioritization rather than as a validated dimensional model. Functional impairment, participation, adaptive functioning, and health-related quality of life are considered transversal outcomes through which the clinical relevance of each domain should be evaluated. We argue that assessment should remain selective and focused on findings with meaningful functional consequences. Clinical priorities should therefore be determined not by tic visibility alone, but by the modifiable factors most strongly associated with meaningful functional consequences. This approach may support more individualized, developmentally informed, and child-centered treatment goals while providing a framework whose clinical usefulness can be evaluated empirically.
Related
- Dual-informant clinical outcome assessment in the inclusive orchestra: measurement architecture for neurodevelopmental disorders prior to empirical evaluation
- OP–118 Pubertal development in children with familial mediterranean fever: a cross-sectional auxological and clinical assessment
- Disorders of vitamin B9 and B12 metabolism in children: prevalence, selected clinical aspects, and optimization of diagnostic approaches
- Rethinking Input Complexity in Transformer-Based Clinical Prediction: Implications for Feature Dimensionality and Sequence Length in Longitudinal EHR Data
- Rethinking large language model evaluation in traditional Chinese medicine: toward quality-grounded standards and fine-grained assessment.
BibTeX
@article{magostini2026when,
title = {{When tics are not the whole story: rethinking clinical assessment in children with tic disorders}},
author = {Francesca Magostini and Alessandro Capuano},
journal = {Frontiers in Neurology},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fneur.2026.1971225},
url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2026.1971225/full},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - When tics are not the whole story: rethinking clinical assessment in children with tic disorders
AU - Francesca Magostini
AU - Alessandro Capuano
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/21
JO - Frontiers in Neurology
DO - 10.3389/fneur.2026.1971225
UR - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2026.1971225/full
AB - Tic disorders are heterogeneous neurodevelopmental conditions in which observable tic severity does not necessarily reflect the difficulties that most affect the child’s everyday life. Premonitory sensations, pain, suppression effort, psychiatric symptoms, motor or sensory features, and executive vulnerabilities may contribute differently to clinical presentation and functional outcomes. In this Perspective, we propose a three-domain clinical framework that distinguishes: (1) observable tic phenomenology and severity; (2) subjective tic-related experience; and (3) the broader neurodevelopmental and psychiatric profile. The framework is intended as a clinical heuristic for organizing assessment and prioritization rather than as a validated dimensional model. Functional impairment, participation, adaptive functioning, and health-related quality of life are considered transversal outcomes through which the clinical relevance of each domain should be evaluated. We argue that assessment should remain selective and focused on findings with meaningful functional consequences. Clinical priorities should therefore be determined not by tic visibility alone, but by the modifiable factors most strongly associated with meaningful functional consequences. This approach may support more individualized, developmentally informed, and child-centered treatment goals while providing a framework whose clinical usefulness can be evaluated empirically.
SN - 1664-2295
ER -