Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,469 studies31 sourcesUpdated 52 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Collaborative AI agents for autonomous experimental research with solid-state quantum spins

Abstract

An autonomous research laboratory could conduct an entire study, from formulating questions to preparing manuscripts. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers one route towards this goal. Recent AI systems take on several research roles, but may draw conclusions that the evidence does not support. Here, we present an autonomous research laboratory in which agents based on large language models assess one another's work and can stop or redirect investigations. They can generate and reject research questions, require separate theoretical checks and conduct experiments designed to challenge their claims. We demonstrate these capabilities by investigating ensembles of quantum spins in diamond. The agents derived the minimum number of calibration settings needed to predict responses to a defined family of microwave pulse sequences. They checked the result computationally and designed experiments to distinguish competing predictions. An initial experiment agreed with the theoretical predictions, but repeated reference measurements showed that the signal was drifting during data collection. The agents therefore treated the result as inconclusive and revised the measurement protocol without relaxing the acceptance criteria. The revised experiment met those criteria and supported the theoretical predictions. This study demonstrates that collaborating AI agents can select research questions, derive theoretical results and test their predictions experimentally.

Related

  1. Can Autonomous LLM Agents Execute Multireference Quantum Chemistry Calculations?
    Victor Chang Lee, James M. Rondinelli
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textPhysical chemistryComputational physicsarXiv
  2. Photonics-GCCE: group collaborative-competitive evolution multi-agent framework for universal and autonomous optical design
    Weijie Xu, Ming Wang, Ruicheng Ma +20
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptics & photonicsarXiv
  3. Hypothesis-Driven Autonomous Materials Synthesis with Multimodal LLM Agents
    Izumi Takahara, Kazunori Nishio, Akira Aiba +4
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCondensed matterarXiv
  4. TheoPhysEval: Assessing AI agents at autonomous theoretical physics problem solving
    A. Ramesh Chandra, Aaghaz Mahajan, Ainesh Sanyal +32
    arXivPreprintCC BY-SA 4.0Full textCondensed matterGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  5. AutoXRD: Autonomous LLM Agents and Comprehensive Evaluation for Powder Diffraction Analysis
    Yuetong Wu, Maojun Sun
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCondensed matterarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{mansouri2026collaborative,
  title = {{Collaborative AI agents for autonomous experimental research with solid-state quantum spins}},
  author = {El Mustapha Mansouri and Eikichi Kimura and Masato Koga and Keigo Arai},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.40589},
  eprint = {2610.40589},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40589},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Collaborative AI agents for autonomous experimental research with solid-state quantum spins
AU  - El Mustapha Mansouri
AU  - Eikichi Kimura
AU  - Masato Koga
AU  - Keigo Arai
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/29
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.40589
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40589
AB  - An autonomous research laboratory could conduct an entire study, from formulating questions to preparing manuscripts. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers one route towards this goal. Recent AI systems take on several research roles, but may draw conclusions that the evidence does not support. Here, we present an autonomous research laboratory in which agents based on large language models assess one another's work and can stop or redirect investigations. They can generate and reject research questions, require separate theoretical checks and conduct experiments designed to challenge their claims. We demonstrate these capabilities by investigating ensembles of quantum spins in diamond. The agents derived the minimum number of calibration settings needed to predict responses to a defined family of microwave pulse sequences. They checked the result computationally and designed experiments to distinguish competing predictions. An initial experiment agreed with the theoretical predictions, but repeated reference measurements showed that the signal was drifting during data collection. The agents therefore treated the result as inconclusive and revised the measurement protocol without relaxing the acceptance criteria. The revised experiment met those criteria and supported the theoretical predictions. This study demonstrates that collaborating AI agents can select research questions, derive theoretical results and test their predictions experimentally.
ER  -