Signal Correlation, IC, and PnL Dependence
Abstract
Signal correlation and PnL correlation are correlations over different index sets - across assets at each date versus across dates for scalar payoffs - and practitioners often treat the first as a proxy for the second. We give an exact decomposition that shows what that proxy sees and what it discards. We recall that at each date a normalized signal's projection onto the realized demeaned return direction is its realized cross-sectional Pearson IC, so that fixed-signal PnL is return dispersion times IC (Qian and Hua, 2004), and we identify the normalized similarity of two signals in the orthogonal complement as their partial correlation controlling for realized returns; the residual rotational freedom is an orthogonal gauge whose invariants are the transverse Gram matrix. Signal correlation therefore equals an uncentered IC cross-moment plus transverse similarity, while Pearson PnL correlation centers and dispersion-weights the IC series alone. Our main result is a non-identifiability theorem: absent constraints on transverse geometry, neither correlation bounds or orders the other, which sharpens the simulation finding of Sorensen, Qian, Schoen, and Hua (2004) into an exact statement. For normalized ensembles the transverse Gram matrix re-enters through the normalization denominator; the ex post optimal combination under Euclidean and general covariance-risk metrics is the classical multiple-correlation bound, and we show that the two rules agree for every longitudinal exposure if and only if the risk metric is isotropic on the signal span. The classical exact null law of partial correlation under isotropy, a synthetic mechanism illustration at weak-IC scales, and inference guidance under temporal dependence complete the treatment.
Related
- Regime-Aware Estimation of Large Equity Correlation Matrices: Tail-Pairwise Dependence and Dynamic Conditional Correlation Decomposition for Water and Energy Sectors
- From Common Information to Canonical Correlation Analysis and Beyond: Bridging Information Theory, Signal Processing, and Machine Learning
- Semantic Similarity‐Informed Bayesian Borrowing for Quantitative Signal Detection of Adverse Events
- Full negative regression dependence: counterexamples for tail dependence and negative association
- Equi-dependence implying independence
BibTeX
@misc{nunes2026signal,
title = {{Signal Correlation, IC, and PnL Dependence}},
author = {Marc Nunes},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.09588},
eprint = {2609.09588},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09588},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Signal Correlation, IC, and PnL Dependence
AU - Marc Nunes
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/09
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.09588
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09588
AB - Signal correlation and PnL correlation are correlations over different index sets - across assets at each date versus across dates for scalar payoffs - and practitioners often treat the first as a proxy for the second. We give an exact decomposition that shows what that proxy sees and what it discards. We recall that at each date a normalized signal's projection onto the realized demeaned return direction is its realized cross-sectional Pearson IC, so that fixed-signal PnL is return dispersion times IC (Qian and Hua, 2004), and we identify the normalized similarity of two signals in the orthogonal complement as their partial correlation controlling for realized returns; the residual rotational freedom is an orthogonal gauge whose invariants are the transverse Gram matrix. Signal correlation therefore equals an uncentered IC cross-moment plus transverse similarity, while Pearson PnL correlation centers and dispersion-weights the IC series alone. Our main result is a non-identifiability theorem: absent constraints on transverse geometry, neither correlation bounds or orders the other, which sharpens the simulation finding of Sorensen, Qian, Schoen, and Hua (2004) into an exact statement. For normalized ensembles the transverse Gram matrix re-enters through the normalization denominator; the ex post optimal combination under Euclidean and general covariance-risk metrics is the classical multiple-correlation bound, and we show that the two rules agree for every longitudinal exposure if and only if the risk metric is isotropic on the signal span. The classical exact null law of partial correlation under isotropy, a synthetic mechanism illustration at weak-IC scales, and inference guidance under temporal dependence complete the treatment.
ER -