Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,230 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Researcher-in-the-Loop Evolutionary Discovery of Entanglement-Assisted Quantum Code Families

Abstract

LLM-guided program evolution can produce mathematical constructions, but validity, generality, and reproducibility require distinct evidence. We develop a researcher-in-the-loop discovery pipeline that combines program evolution, exact evaluation, mathematical generalization, certified nonexistence checks, and formal proof checking. We apply it to entanglement-assisted quantum error-correcting codes (EAQECCs). Starting from tasks that did not specify a family formula, evolved programs produced finite qubit constructions whose structure researchers generalized to the family [[n,1,n−1;n−q−1]]q for prime powers q≥3 at n≥2q+1 and for q=2 at odd n≥5. Lean checks the algebraic certificate underlying this family. Together with entanglement lifting, the family closes 54 gaps in archived EAQECC tables. The released evidence includes 115 verified code records, ten nonexistence results with checked DRAT proofs, family implementations, and preserved search programs for exact checks and seeded replay. In a controlled cohort of eight paired generation blocks, validation-selected iterative programs achieve success in 46.1% and 31.6% of held-out executions at unseen lengths n=13,15, compared with 19.5% and 3.1% for independently generated programs. In this setting, program evolution and researcher analysis turn finite computational discoveries into a proved family with independently checkable evidence.

Related

  1. ResearchMatch: A Semantic-Bibliometric Prototype for Evidence-Supported Researcher Discovery
    Daniel Segboru Emmanuel, Ikiomoye Emmanuel
    Journal of Information Systems and InformaticsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral mathematicsDOAJ
  2. GRAFT-ATHENA: Self-Improving Agentic Teams for Autonomous Discovery and Evolutionary Numerical Algorithms
    Juan Diego Toscano, Zhaojie Chai, George Em Karniadakis
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textProbabilityarXiv
  3. New distance bounds for one-generator quasi-cyclic codes with applications to Hermitian LCD codes and entanglement-assisted quantum codes
    Kanat Abdukhalikov, Duy Ho, Rasha M. Shat
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  4. Simultaneous Reduction of Observables and Measured Qudits in Entanglement-Assisted Quantum Local Recovery
    Ryutaroh Matsumoto
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. Optimizing Encoder Circuits of Entanglement-Assisted Quantum LDPC Codes via Beam Search
    Aditya Sodhani, Pavan Kumar, Shayan Srinivasa Garani +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{baek2026researcherintheloop,
  title = {{Researcher-in-the-Loop Evolutionary Discovery of Entanglement-Assisted Quantum Code Families}},
  author = {Jae-Hyun Baek and Byung-Sun Won and Jon-Lark Kim},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.41183},
  eprint = {2610.41183},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41183},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Researcher-in-the-Loop Evolutionary Discovery of Entanglement-Assisted Quantum Code Families
AU  - Jae-Hyun Baek
AU  - Byung-Sun Won
AU  - Jon-Lark Kim
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/30
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.41183
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41183
AB  - LLM-guided program evolution can produce mathematical constructions, but validity, generality, and reproducibility require distinct evidence. We develop a researcher-in-the-loop discovery pipeline that combines program evolution, exact evaluation, mathematical generalization, certified nonexistence checks, and formal proof checking. We apply it to entanglement-assisted quantum error-correcting codes (EAQECCs). Starting from tasks that did not specify a family formula, evolved programs produced finite qubit constructions whose structure researchers generalized to the family [[n,1,n−1;n−q−1]]_q for prime powers q≥3 at n≥2q+1 and for q=2 at odd n≥5. Lean checks the algebraic certificate underlying this family. Together with entanglement lifting, the family closes 54 gaps in archived EAQECC tables. The released evidence includes 115 verified code records, ten nonexistence results with checked DRAT proofs, family implementations, and preserved search programs for exact checks and seeded replay. In a controlled cohort of eight paired generation blocks, validation-selected iterative programs achieve success in 46.1% and 31.6% of held-out executions at unseen lengths n=13,15, compared with 19.5% and 3.1% for independently generated programs. In this setting, program evolution and researcher analysis turn finite computational discoveries into a proved family with independently checkable evidence.
ER  -