Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 25 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Tektonika

Unraveling the Kinematics and Morphotectonics of the Petrinja Fault (Croatia), Source of the 2020 M 6.4 Earthquake

5 more authors

Abstract

The 2020 Mw 6.4 Petrinja earthquake in central Croatia is one of the European strongest continental earthquakes in recent decades. This event shed light on the poorly investigated Petrinja-Pokupsko Fault (PPKF) zone, a right-lateral fault system accommodating a fraction of the shortening between the Adria and European plates. Through field observations and high-resolution Lidar-derived digital elevation models of the central section of the PPKF, we precisely mapped the fault trace, revealing a discontinuous geometry with a main fault strand and left-stepping segments in agreement with the position of the 2020 surface ruptures. To the north, the accumulated relief from this transpressive fault system decreases, and the fault trace becomes less distinct, suggesting a northward propagation of the deformation. Cumulative offsets of 4 to 24 meters along the main fault strands in the central and southern sections of the fault attest to its Quaternary activity. Dating results suggest offset markers at the Marine Isotopic Stage 4 (MIS 4), the Late Glacial Maximum (LGM) or the Early Holocene periods, allowing for the first direct estimation of the fault slip rates. Preliminary estimates indicate that, assuming a common MIS 4 or LGM age for the investigated markers, fault slip rates range from 0.2 to 0.7 mm/yr and 0.7 to 1.6 mm/yr, respectively. In contrast, assigning Early Holocene ages would imply much higher - and likely unrealistic - slip rates of 1.6 to 3.9 mm/yr. Although the estimated loading rates vary greatly and depend on strong assumptions regarding the age of the markers abandonment, our results suggest a minimum fault slip-rate of 0.2 mm/yr for local seismic hazard assessments.

Related

  1. DISPLACEMENT RATES AND SEISMIC POTENTIAL OF THE KHILOK FAULT, SOUTHWESTERN TRANSBAIKALIA: INSIGHTS FROM MORPHOTECTONICS, PALEOSEISMOLOGY, AND IN SITU 10Be COSMOGENIC DATING
    A. Arzhannikova, S. Arzhannikov, Regis Braucher +1
    Geodynamics & TectonophysicsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  2. Graph-based probabilistic earthquake clustering and forecasting in Sumatra
    Giuseppe Petrillo, Stefania Gentili, Luca Dal Zilio
    TectonophysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeophysics & seismologyHAL
  3. Sustained crustal helium enrichment associated with postseismic viscoelastic relaxation following the 2025 Myanmar earthquake
    Hongyi He, Zhi Chen, Yujiang Li +6
    Communications Earth & EnvironmentPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General earth scienceNatureCrossref
  4. Lithium and strontium isotope systematics of hot spring waters from the Noto Peninsula: Constraints on the origin of geofluids associated with the 2024 M7.6 earthquake
    Zahra Zandvakili, Takanori Kagoshima, Tomoaki Morishita +4
    GEOCHEMICAL JOURNALPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textGeology & geochemistryJ-STAGE
  5. On-Fault Parameters and Fault Connectivity Control Synthetic Earthquake Catalogs and 30-Year Rupture Probabilities in RSQSim Simulations of the Eastern San Francisco Bay Area
    Evan Marschall, Alice-Agnes Gabriel, Bruce Shaw +4
    EarthArXivPreprintPublisher termsFull textGeophysics & seismologyEarthArXiv
BibTeX
@article{henriquet2026unraveling,
  title = {{Unraveling the Kinematics and Morphotectonics of the Petrinja Fault (Croatia), Source of the 2020 M 6.4 Earthquake}},
  author = {Maxime Henriquet and Lucilla Benedetti and Stéphane Baize and Branko Kordić and Marianne Métois and Josipa Maslač Soldo and Nikola Belić and Marko Špelić and Daniela Pantosti and Francesca Cinti and Stefano Pucci and Alessio Testa and Paolo Boncio and Bruno Pace and Petra Jamšek Rupnik and Adrien Moulin and Riccardo Civico},
  journal = {Tektonika},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.55575/tektonika2026.4.1.104},
  url = {https://cnrs.hal.science/hal-05852934v1},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Unraveling the Kinematics and Morphotectonics of the Petrinja Fault (Croatia), Source of the 2020 M 6.4 Earthquake
AU  - Maxime Henriquet
AU  - Lucilla Benedetti
AU  - Stéphane Baize
AU  - Branko Kordić
AU  - Marianne Métois
AU  - Josipa Maslač Soldo
AU  - Nikola Belić
AU  - Marko Špelić
AU  - Daniela Pantosti
AU  - Francesca Cinti
AU  - Stefano Pucci
AU  - Alessio Testa
AU  - Paolo Boncio
AU  - Bruno Pace
AU  - Petra Jamšek Rupnik
AU  - Adrien Moulin
AU  - Riccardo Civico
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/05
JO  - Tektonika
DO  - 10.55575/tektonika2026.4.1.104
UR  - https://cnrs.hal.science/hal-05852934v1
AB  - The 2020 Mw 6.4 Petrinja earthquake in central Croatia is one of the European strongest continental earthquakes in recent decades. This event shed light on the poorly investigated Petrinja-Pokupsko Fault (PPKF) zone, a right-lateral fault system accommodating a fraction of the shortening between the Adria and European plates. Through field observations and high-resolution Lidar-derived digital elevation models of the central section of the PPKF, we precisely mapped the fault trace, revealing a discontinuous geometry with a main fault strand and left-stepping segments in agreement with the position of the 2020 surface ruptures. To the north, the accumulated relief from this transpressive fault system decreases, and the fault trace becomes less distinct, suggesting a northward propagation of the deformation. Cumulative offsets of 4 to 24 meters along the main fault strands in the central and southern sections of the fault attest to its Quaternary activity. Dating results suggest offset markers at the Marine Isotopic Stage 4 (MIS 4), the Late Glacial Maximum (LGM) or the Early Holocene periods, allowing for the first direct estimation of the fault slip rates. Preliminary estimates indicate that, assuming a common MIS 4 or LGM age for the investigated markers, fault slip rates range from 0.2 to 0.7 mm/yr and 0.7 to 1.6 mm/yr, respectively. In contrast, assigning Early Holocene ages would imply much higher - and likely unrealistic - slip rates of 1.6 to 3.9 mm/yr. Although the estimated loading rates vary greatly and depend on strong assumptions regarding the age of the markers abandonment, our results suggest a minimum fault slip-rate of 0.2 mm/yr for local seismic hazard assessments.
SN  - 2976-548X
ER  -