Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 23 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Variational Splines and Generalized Gaussian Processes

Abstract

Tikhonov regularization, kriging, and Gaussian-process regression share the same algorithm because, for a linear inverse problem with a Gaussian prior and Gaussian noise, the minimum-mean-square-error (MMSE) estimator is the solution of a regularized least-squares problem. We show that this equivalence survives the passage from vectors to generalized functions: the regularized least-squares estimators become generalized splines, and the Gaussian random vectors become generalized Gaussian processes (GGPs) on the dual of a nuclear space. A whitening operator L: ๐’ฎ โ†’ L2 specifies both the native Hilbert space โ„‹L โŠ‚ ๐’ฎ' of the splines and a family of GGPs, which solve a stochastic differential equation subject to boundary conditions. We prove that the Gaussian spaces of these processes are congruent to the core Lโˆ—(L2) of the native space, and that their MMSE estimators from finitely many linear measurements are generalized splines. Our framework extends the classical correspondences of Kimeldorf-Wahba, Parzen and Kailath in two respects: our estimators form a broader class that includes generalized functions, and we give a proper Bayesian treatment of the case where the null space of L is non-trivial. The framework gives a precise meaning to statements such as ``fractional splines are the optimal estimators of fractional Brownian motion,'' and it provides a rigorous Bayesian formulation of infinite-dimensional linear inverse problems.

Related

  1. Generalized Splines and Gaussian Processes
    Michael Unser
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsStatisticsarXiv
  2. Geometry-Aware Block Selection for Sparse Variational Gaussian Processes
    Matteo Hoxha
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Quadratic variations of rough generalized Hermite processes: hidden long memory and a universal Gaussian boundary field
    Obayda Julien Assaad
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textProbabilityarXiv
  4. An invariant variational proof for canonical processes with independent symmetric log-concave tails
    Witold Bednorz, Rafal Martynek, Rafal Meller
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textProbabilityarXiv
  5. A variational principle for Gaussian lattice sums
    Laurent Bรฉtermin, Markus Faulhuber, Stefan Steinerberger
    Forum of Mathematics, PiPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.02 citedAlgebra & number theoryCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{unser2026variational,
  title = {{Variational Splines and Generalized Gaussian Processes}},
  author = {Michael Unser},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2611.06233},
  eprint = {2611.06233},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06233},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Variational Splines and Generalized Gaussian Processes
AU  - Michael Unser
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/04
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2611.06233
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06233
AB  - Tikhonov regularization, kriging, and Gaussian-process regression share the same algorithm because, for a linear inverse problem with a Gaussian prior and Gaussian noise, the minimum-mean-square-error (MMSE) estimator is the solution of a regularized least-squares problem. We show that this equivalence survives the passage from vectors to generalized functions: the regularized least-squares estimators become generalized splines, and the Gaussian random vectors become generalized Gaussian processes (GGPs) on the dual of a nuclear space. A whitening operator L: ๐’ฎ โ†’ L_2 specifies both the native Hilbert space โ„‹_L โŠ‚ ๐’ฎ' of the splines and a family of GGPs, which solve a stochastic differential equation subject to boundary conditions. We prove that the Gaussian spaces of these processes are congruent to the core L^โˆ—(L_2) of the native space, and that their MMSE estimators from finitely many linear measurements are generalized splines. Our framework extends the classical correspondences of Kimeldorf-Wahba, Parzen and Kailath in two respects: our estimators form a broader class that includes generalized functions, and we give a proper Bayesian treatment of the case where the null space of L is non-trivial. The framework gives a precise meaning to statements such as ``fractional splines are the optimal estimators of fractional Brownian motion,'' and it provides a rigorous Bayesian formulation of infinite-dimensional linear inverse problems.
ER  -