Mentoring Trainees with Lived Experience of Psychopathology: A Strengths-based, Cultural Humility Framework for Psychological Scientists
Abstract
Mental health difficulties are prevalent among psychologists, yet professionals in the field are often discouraged from disclosing their lived experience with psychopathology due to persistent stigma. For much of history, lived experience with psychopathology has been treated as a deficit within the profession. However, emerging research and perspectives are beginning to challenge this status quo by highlighting that lived experience can be an asset in psychological science and practice. Despite this shift, there remains little guidance on how to navigate this topic in mentor-mentee relationships. We outline a framework for strengths-based mentorship that is based on six pillars: 1) tenets of strengths-based mentorship; 2) foundational and functional mentorship competencies; 3) mental health literacy; 4) feminist principles; 5) cultural humility; and 6) ethical considerations. This framework can help improve mentor-mentee relationships, reduce stigma, and ultimately improve the professional development of mentees with lived experience. We apply this principle-driven framework to common professional scenarios: recruiting applicants, evaluating personal statements, and navigating situations when a mentee is distressed, requesting accommodations, or interested in leveraging their lived experiences in their work. By offering this framework, we aim to facilitate dialogue and provide actionable guidance for mentors seeking to support trainees with psychopathology.
Versions
Related
- Psychological flexibility in the work-caregiving interplay of employed family caregivers of people with dementia (DAILY-FLEX): Protocol of an experience sampling study
- Developmental mentoring in otolaryngology: a qualitative study highlighting gaps in understanding and implementation
- Enhancing global health security through tele-mentoring: a descriptive case study of the public health surveillance ECHO in Uganda
- The long arc of scientists in spaceflight: scientists flying with their experiments.
- Mapping local cluster separation, global community structure, and leadership concentration among the 2025 top 2% dermatology scientists : Beyond rankings
BibTeX
@misc{devendorf2026mentoring,
title = {{Mentoring Trainees with Lived Experience of Psychopathology: A Strengths-based, Cultural Humility Framework for Psychological Scientists}},
author = {Andrew Devendorf and Julie Cristello and Cassandra L. Boness and Irene Tung and Cecilia Hinojosa},
howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.31234/osf.io/zuc63_v3},
url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/zuc63_v3/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Mentoring Trainees with Lived Experience of Psychopathology: A Strengths-based, Cultural Humility Framework for Psychological Scientists
AU - Andrew Devendorf
AU - Julie Cristello
AU - Cassandra L. Boness
AU - Irene Tung
AU - Cecilia Hinojosa
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/16
PB - PsyArXiv
DO - 10.31234/osf.io/zuc63_v3
UR - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/zuc63_v3/
AB - Mental health difficulties are prevalent among psychologists, yet professionals in the field are often discouraged from disclosing their lived experience with psychopathology due to persistent stigma. For much of history, lived experience with psychopathology has been treated as a deficit within the profession. However, emerging research and perspectives are beginning to challenge this status quo by highlighting that lived experience can be an asset in psychological science and practice. Despite this shift, there remains little guidance on how to navigate this topic in mentor-mentee relationships. We outline a framework for strengths-based mentorship that is based on six pillars: 1) tenets of strengths-based mentorship; 2) foundational and functional mentorship competencies; 3) mental health literacy; 4) feminist principles; 5) cultural humility; and 6) ethical considerations. This framework can help improve mentor-mentee relationships, reduce stigma, and ultimately improve the professional development of mentees with lived experience. We apply this principle-driven framework to common professional scenarios: recruiting applicants, evaluating personal statements, and navigating situations when a mentee is distressed, requesting accommodations, or interested in leveraging their lived experiences in their work. By offering this framework, we aim to facilitate dialogue and provide actionable guidance for mentors seeking to support trainees with psychopathology.
ER -