Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,230 studies31 sourcesUpdated 21 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0arXiv

Can coupled thawing quintessence reproduce DESI DR2? A test with two potentials

Abstract

DESI DR2 favours dark energy whose equation of state evolves crossing w=−1 in the past. Coupled quintessence can produce such an apparent phantom crossing without a phantom field, since a coupled dark sector analysed under the assumption of separate conservation yields an effective equation of state below −1. We test whether this mechanism can reproduce the DESI result, using two thawing potentials, a cosine and a double-exponential hilltop, confronted with DESI DR2 BAO, Planck PR4 and three supernova compilations. Both models improve on ΛCDM by Δχ2 = 5--$15$, recovering $64−−92\%$ of the improvement achieved by w0waCDM. They track the w0waCDM equation of state at z≲0.4 but cross the phantom divide later, near z≃1 rather than z≃0.4--$0.5$. The coupling is bounded at |β|<0.073 (95%), and the two potentials agree on it to within 0.15σ. They differ instead in the equation of state they can reach: the cosine comes closer to the evolution preferred by DESI and is weakly preferred by the fit. The coupling posterior is bimodal, with modes at β≃±0.05; only the negative mode produces the crossing, and it is the higher of the two in every analysis. In conclusion, the data favour the coupled quintessence phantom crossing but do not yet require it.

Related

  1. Nonminimally coupled quintessence with sign-switching interaction
    Jia-Qi Wang, Rong-Gen Cai, Zong‐Kuan Guo +3
    Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Peer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text19 citedCosmologyOpenAlex
  2. Non-minimally coupled running curvaton for DESI-motivated dynamical dark energy
    Bichu Li, Lei-Hua Liu
    The European Physical Journal CPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCosmologyCrossref
  3. Exponential Quintessence: Analytic Relationship Between the Current Equation of State Parameter and the Potential Parameter
    Naoto Maki, Kazunori Kohri
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCosmologyGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  4. Axionic Quintessence in Heterotic String Theory
    David Andriot, Margherita Putti, Leo Veissiere
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCosmologyGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  5. Cosmological Perturbations and Observational Constraints on Spinor Field Quintessence Dark Energy
    Mahendra Goray
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCosmologyarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{babu2026coupled,
  title = {{Can coupled thawing quintessence reproduce DESI DR2? A test with two potentials}},
  author = {Jhananii Yuvaraj Babu and Luca Amendola},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.23497},
  eprint = {2610.23497},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23497},
  note = {CC BY-NC-SA 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Can coupled thawing quintessence reproduce DESI DR2? A test with two potentials
AU  - Jhananii Yuvaraj Babu
AU  - Luca Amendola
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/16
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.23497
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23497
AB  - DESI DR2 favours dark energy whose equation of state evolves crossing w=−1 in the past. Coupled quintessence can produce such an apparent phantom crossing without a phantom field, since a coupled dark sector analysed under the assumption of separate conservation yields an effective equation of state below −1. We test whether this mechanism can reproduce the DESI result, using two thawing potentials, a cosine and a double-exponential hilltop, confronted with DESI DR2 BAO, Planck PR4 and three supernova compilations. Both models improve on ΛCDM by Δχ^2 = 5--$15$, recovering $64−−92\%$ of the improvement achieved by w_0w_aCDM. They track the w_0w_aCDM equation of state at z≲0.4 but cross the phantom divide later, near z≃1 rather than z≃0.4--$0.5$. The coupling is bounded at |β|<0.073 (95%), and the two potentials agree on it to within 0.15σ. They differ instead in the equation of state they can reach: the cosine comes closer to the evolution preferred by DESI and is weakly preferred by the fit. The coupling posterior is bimodal, with modes at β≃±0.05; only the negative mode produces the crossing, and it is the higher of the two in every analysis. In conclusion, the data favour the coupled quintessence phantom crossing but do not yet require it.
ER  -