Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 9 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Fire and Materials

Interlaboratory Evaluation of ISO / TS 21397: FTIR Gas Analysis Coupled With Cone Calorimeter

Abstract

The quantitative analysis of fire effluents is essential for assessing both toxic hazards and combustion chemistry. ISO/TS 21397 specifies the use of Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy coupled to cone calorimeter tests for the online measurement of fire gases. To evaluate the robustness of this method, an interlaboratory round robin was conducted under the framework of ISO/TC 92. Six laboratories participated, four of which provided complete FTIR datasets. Four polymers were selected to represent different effluent profiles: high‐density polyethylene (HDPE), polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), polyamide 6.6 (PA 6.6), and unplasticised polyvinyl chloride (PVC). Each laboratory performed three replicate cone calorimeter tests at 50 kW/m 2 . Combustion parameters (peak heat release rate, total heat release, effective heat of combustion) and effluent species were analysed. Qualitative results showed consistent identification of expected major species: carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and carbon monoxide (CO) for all polymers, nitric oxide (NO) for PA 6.6 and hydrogen chloride (HCl) for PVC. Quantitative analysis focused on maximum concentrations and yields of CO 2 , CO, NO and HCl. Statistical treatment following ISO 5725 provided complete repeatability and reproducibility values. The results revealed a clear hierarchy in reproducibility: combustion parameters showed the lowest variability, followed by CO 2 , then CO, with NO and HCl exhibiting higher dispersion. Minor species such as HCN and NO 2 were detected inconsistently and excluded from statistical treatment. The study confirms that ISO/TS 21397 yields reproducible data for the major effluents of interest, while highlighting the need for more prescriptive guidance on calibration and quantification methods to further improve interlaboratory agreement.

Related

  1. Comparing Suspect and Nontargeted Screening Workflows for Perinatal Chemical Exposome Analysis: A European Interlaboratory Study from the PARC-EU Project
    Tarek Moufawad, Kolawole Ayeni, Eirini Baira +29
    Environmental Science and TechnologyPeer-reviewedLicence not statedAnalytical chemistryHAL
  2. Evaluation of the nano Liquid Chromatography coupled with Zeno TOF 7600 Mass Spectrometer for Cell Type-Resolved Spatial Proteomics
    Keren Zhang, Xi Wang, Wan He +8
    Molecular & Cellular ProteomicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Physical chemistryCrossref
  3. Interlaboratory comparison of a multiplex bead assay against the Chlamydia trachomatis antigen Pgp3 using two monoclonal antibody clones
    Sarah Gwyn, Karana Wickens, Helena Brazal Monzo +9
    PLOS Global Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationImmunologyPLOSPMC
  4. Comparative assessment of screening workflows for characterizing occupational exposure to chemicals in humans: an EU-PARC interlaboratory study
    Baninia Habchi, Aurélie Martin Remy, Lidia Belova +45
    Environmental Sciences EuropePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textAnalytical chemistryHAL
  5. Optimization and interlaboratory validation of the HydroTouch test for fingertip-mediated microbial transmission and antimicrobial efficacy assessment of surfaces
    Roberto B.M. Marano, Mihyun Lee, Celeste Peterson +11
    BMC MicrobiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOrganic chemistryPMC
BibTeX
@article{guillaume2026interlaboratory,
  title = {{Interlaboratory Evaluation of ISO / TS 21397: FTIR Gas Analysis Coupled With Cone Calorimeter}},
  author = {Eric Guillaume and Damien Flammier and Per Blomqvist and Anna Sandinge and Thomas Rogaume and Jocelyn Luche and Talal Fateh and Bauke Knottnerus},
  journal = {Fire and Materials},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1002/fam.70067},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05773124v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-SA 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Interlaboratory Evaluation of ISO / TS 21397: FTIR Gas Analysis Coupled With Cone Calorimeter
AU  - Eric Guillaume
AU  - Damien Flammier
AU  - Per Blomqvist
AU  - Anna Sandinge
AU  - Thomas Rogaume
AU  - Jocelyn Luche
AU  - Talal Fateh
AU  - Bauke Knottnerus
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/02
JO  - Fire and Materials
DO  - 10.1002/fam.70067
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05773124v1
AB  - The quantitative analysis of fire effluents is essential for assessing both toxic hazards and combustion chemistry. ISO/TS 21397 specifies the use of Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy coupled to cone calorimeter tests for the online measurement of fire gases. To evaluate the robustness of this method, an interlaboratory round robin was conducted under the framework of ISO/TC 92. Six laboratories participated, four of which provided complete FTIR datasets. Four polymers were selected to represent different effluent profiles: high‐density polyethylene (HDPE), polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), polyamide 6.6 (PA 6.6), and unplasticised polyvinyl chloride (PVC). Each laboratory performed three replicate cone calorimeter tests at 50 kW/m 2 . Combustion parameters (peak heat release rate, total heat release, effective heat of combustion) and effluent species were analysed. Qualitative results showed consistent identification of expected major species: carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and carbon monoxide (CO) for all polymers, nitric oxide (NO) for PA 6.6 and hydrogen chloride (HCl) for PVC. Quantitative analysis focused on maximum concentrations and yields of CO 2 , CO, NO and HCl. Statistical treatment following ISO 5725 provided complete repeatability and reproducibility values. The results revealed a clear hierarchy in reproducibility: combustion parameters showed the lowest variability, followed by CO 2 , then CO, with NO and HCl exhibiting higher dispersion. Minor species such as HCN and NO 2 were detected inconsistently and excluded from statistical treatment. The study confirms that ISO/TS 21397 yields reproducible data for the major effluents of interest, while highlighting the need for more prescriptive guidance on calibration and quantification methods to further improve interlaboratory agreement.
SN  - 0308-0501
SN  - 1099-1018
ER  -