Region-specific hamstring activation and its dissociation from subjective contraction sensation during leg curl exercise at different hip flexion angles.
4 affiliations
- 1Research Institute for Sport Science, Nippon Sport Science University, 7‑1‑1 Fukasawa, Setagaya‑ku, Tokyo, Japan. [email protected].
- 2Research Institute for Sport Science, Nippon Sport Science University, 7‑1‑1 Fukasawa, Setagaya‑ku, Tokyo, Japan.
- 3Faculty of Medical Science, Nippon Sport Science University, 1221‑1 Kamoshida‑cho, Aoba‑ku, Yokohama‑shi, Kanagawa, Japan.
- 4Faculty of Sport Science, Nippon Sport Science University, Fukasawa, Setagaya‑ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
Background
Hamstring activation during resistance training may vary according to muscle region and joint position. However, the relationship between region-specific hamstring activation and subjective contraction sensation during leg curl exercise remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate region-specific and longitudinally compartmentalized muscle dynamics of the hamstring during leg curl (LC) exercise performed at different hip flexion angles (HFA), and to examine the relationship between subjective contraction sensation and objective muscle activity.Methods
Nine male bodybuilders performed unilateral LC at three hip flexion angles (0°, 40°, and 80°), with knee flexion ranging from 0° to 130°. Pre- and post-exercise transverse relaxation times (T2) were measured using magnetic resonance imaging. Each LC session consisted of 5 sets of 10 repetitions at 70% of one-repetition maximum, with 1-minute rest intervals. The hamstring was divided into proximal, middle, and distal regions for the biceps femoris long (BF-long) and short heads, semitendinosus (ST), and semimembranosus. T2 activation rates were calculated for each region. The subjective sensation of hamstring contraction during LC exercise was evaluated using a numerical rating scale (NRS) and compared with the T2 value.Results
Across all conditions, the ST exhibited greater activation than the other hamstring muscles (p < 0.01, p < 0.05). In particular, the distal region showed higher activation than the proximal region at HFA 0° (p < 0.05). For the BF-long, greater activation was observed in the proximal region compared with the distal region at HFA 40° (p < 0.01). The NRS scores were inconsistent with the objective index.Conclusion
The ST is preferentially activated during LC exercise. Hamstring activation is both region-specific and longitudinally compartmentalized, depending on muscle length as influenced by HFA. Because NRS was dissociated from T2 values, hamstring resistance training should not rely solely on perceived muscle contraction, but should instead consider objective muscle activation characteristics. However, since NRS and T2 values were not directly compared in the present study, further advanced research addressing these limitations is warranted in the future. Optimal hip positioning should therefore be considered when designing resistance training programs to effectively target specific hamstring regions.
Related
- Dissociation between muscle activation, spinal joint load, and subjective perception in passive back support exoskeleton use
- Effects of ice-pack application on hand skin temperature and subjective thermal sensation and comfort in healthy young men: a randomised, parallel-group controlled trial
- Effects of keiser-assisted Nordic hamstring curl training on hamstring flexibility, mechanical properties, and pitching performance in high school baseball pitchers
- Autograft Selection in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-Analysis of Patellar Tendon versus Hamstring Tendon Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials
- Saphenous nerve injury in ACL reconstruction: higher risk with dual hamstring harvest – an observational study
BibTeX
@article{mitsuya2026regionspecific,
title = {{Region-specific hamstring activation and its dissociation from subjective contraction sensation during leg curl exercise at different hip flexion angles.}},
author = {Hiroku Mitsuya and Koichi Nakazato and Takashi Okada},
journal = {BMC sports science, medicine \& rehabilitation},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1186/s13102-026-01910-7},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42958421},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Region-specific hamstring activation and its dissociation from subjective contraction sensation during leg curl exercise at different hip flexion angles.
AU - Hiroku Mitsuya
AU - Koichi Nakazato
AU - Takashi Okada
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/31
JO - BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation
DO - 10.1186/s13102-026-01910-7
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42958421
AB - Background Hamstring activation during resistance training may vary according to muscle region and joint position. However, the relationship between region-specific hamstring activation and subjective contraction sensation during leg curl exercise remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate region-specific and longitudinally compartmentalized muscle dynamics of the hamstring during leg curl (LC) exercise performed at different hip flexion angles (HFA), and to examine the relationship between subjective contraction sensation and objective muscle activity.Methods Nine male bodybuilders performed unilateral LC at three hip flexion angles (0°, 40°, and 80°), with knee flexion ranging from 0° to 130°. Pre- and post-exercise transverse relaxation times (T2) were measured using magnetic resonance imaging. Each LC session consisted of 5 sets of 10 repetitions at 70% of one-repetition maximum, with 1-minute rest intervals. The hamstring was divided into proximal, middle, and distal regions for the biceps femoris long (BF-long) and short heads, semitendinosus (ST), and semimembranosus. T2 activation rates were calculated for each region. The subjective sensation of hamstring contraction during LC exercise was evaluated using a numerical rating scale (NRS) and compared with the T2 value.Results Across all conditions, the ST exhibited greater activation than the other hamstring muscles (p < 0.01, p < 0.05). In particular, the distal region showed higher activation than the proximal region at HFA 0° (p < 0.05). For the BF-long, greater activation was observed in the proximal region compared with the distal region at HFA 40° (p < 0.01). The NRS scores were inconsistent with the objective index.Conclusion The ST is preferentially activated during LC exercise. Hamstring activation is both region-specific and longitudinally compartmentalized, depending on muscle length as influenced by HFA. Because NRS was dissociated from T2 values, hamstring resistance training should not rely solely on perceived muscle contraction, but should instead consider objective muscle activation characteristics. However, since NRS and T2 values were not directly compared in the present study, further advanced research addressing these limitations is warranted in the future. Optimal hip positioning should therefore be considered when designing resistance training programs to effectively target specific hamstring regions.
SN - 2052-1847
ER -