Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 17 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS Global Public Health

Reclaiming the new era in global health: A proposal for an equity-centered paradigm

  1. 1Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America
  2. 2Health, Nutrition and Population Global Practice, World Bank, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America

Abstract

Global health is facing unprecedented upheaval, with significant donor disruptions requiring a reconfiguration of the global health landscape. While recently proposed frameworks for the next phase of global health represent meaningful progress in grappling with this context, their central weakness is not technical but normative. In this Essay, we argue that if the new global health architecture is defined without meaningful interrogation of its central purpose, then the system will reproduce the very problems it aims to solve. On the other hand, explicitly centering health equity as the organizing principle of the new “global health” brings to the foreground the shared struggles and movements of marginalized communities worldwide. In doing so, it demands a more fundamental, global reckoning with the structural determinants – politics and power - that produce ill health across and within countries. From this logic flows substantive shifts in global health functions, predicated on a social-ecological model: from substitution to mutual aid; from technical assistance to knowledge sharing; from global public goods to multisectoral common goods for all; and from mechanisms that facilitate global coordination to ones that also critically address the distribution of power and resources.

Related

  1. Why deinstitutionalisation still matters: Reclaiming a contested horizon in global mental health
    Cristian Montenegro, Felipe Szabzon, Sofía Bowen +1
    PLOS Mental HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthPLOS
  2. Beyond reproduction: Reclaiming the full meaning of sexual and reproductive health
    Silvana Matassini Eyzaguirre, Katherine Tumlinson, Angela Muriuki +1
    PLOS Global Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral biologyEndocrinology & metabolismPLOSPMC
  3. Proposal for a Global Classification and Nomenclature System for A/H9 Influenza Viruses
    Alice Fusaro, Juan Pu, Yong Zhou +11
    Emerging Infectious DiseasesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text39 citedGeneral biologyInfectious diseaseHAL
  4. Accountability and equity in primary health care: co-creating user-centered evaluation systems for public-private partnerships
    Vera Schattan P. Coelho, Frederico Haddad
    Frontiers in public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  5. Lipedema research (2000-2025): a global bibliometric analysis with evidence of an emerging immunological paradigm.
    Alexandre Campos Moraes Amato, Juliana Lelis Spirandeli Amato, Daniel Augusto Benitti
    Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{yerramilli2026reclaiming,
  title = {{Reclaiming the new era in global health: A proposal for an equity-centered paradigm}},
  author = {Pooja Yerramilli and Mickey Chopra},
  journal = {PLOS Global Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pgph.0007379},
  url = {https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0007379},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Reclaiming the new era in global health: A proposal for an equity-centered paradigm
AU  - Pooja Yerramilli
AU  - Mickey Chopra
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - PLOS Global Public Health
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pgph.0007379
UR  - https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0007379
AB  - Global health is facing unprecedented upheaval, with significant donor disruptions requiring a reconfiguration of the global health landscape. While recently proposed frameworks for the next phase of global health represent meaningful progress in grappling with this context, their central weakness is not technical but normative. In this Essay, we argue that if the new global health architecture is defined without meaningful interrogation of its central purpose, then the system will reproduce the very problems it aims to solve. On the other hand, explicitly centering health equity as the organizing principle of the new “global health” brings to the foreground the shared struggles and movements of marginalized communities worldwide. In doing so, it demands a more fundamental, global reckoning with the structural determinants – politics and power - that produce ill health across and within countries. From this logic flows substantive shifts in global health functions, predicated on a social-ecological model: from substitution to mutual aid; from technical assistance to knowledge sharing; from global public goods to multisectoral common goods for all; and from mechanisms that facilitate global coordination to ones that also critically address the distribution of power and resources.
SN  - 2767-3375
ER  -