Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 2 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYContraception and Reproductive Medicine

Beyond women’s burden: integrating male partners into contraceptive decision-making

  1. 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Medical college and Hospital
  2. 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences

Abstract

Background Contraceptive use and family planning have traditionally been viewed as women’s responsibility, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Despite growing evidence highlighting the positive impact of male involvement in improving contraceptive uptake, continuation, and reproductive health outcomes, the participation of male partners remains limited. This review explores the critical role of male partners in contraceptive decision-making and synthesizes current evidence on the barriers impeding their participation. It further identifies strategies and interventions to foster shared responsibility in family planning and promote equitable reproductive health practices. Methods A narrative review approach was adopted to collate global and regional evidence from peer-reviewed literature, policy reports, and relevant case studies. The review is structured around five core themes: sociocultural and gender norms, knowledge and educational barriers, limitations within healthcare systems, misconceptions around male contraceptive methods, and systemic challenges to implementation. The review also presents innovative, context-sensitive strategies for male engagement and future directions to enhance male participation in family planning. Results The analysis reveals that male involvement remains suboptimal due to persistent patriarchal norms, misinformation, stigma, and limited access to male-centric contraceptive options. Existing family planning programs often lack couple-focused counseling and fail to provide inclusive services for men. However, interventions such as couple-based education, male-friendly clinics, community advocacy, gamified digital tools, and AI-enabled reproductive health platforms show promise in shifting attitudes and improving engagement. Success stories from countries including Tanzania, Vietnam, and India provide evidence for scalable, culturally adaptive models that facilitate male involvement. Conclusion Strengthening male participation is pivotal for achieving equitable reproductive health outcomes. Multi-level strategies, such as spanning education, service delivery, community norms, and policy integration, are essential to promote shared responsibility. Addressing systemic barriers, expanding male contraceptive choices, and leveraging technology can catalyze behavioral change and contribute to more inclusive, effective, and sustainable family planning programs.

Related

  1. Male partners’ roles in women’s contraceptive decision-making in Nigeria: a secondary qualitative data analysis
    Awawu Grace Nmadu, Sneha Challa, Chioma Okoli +7
    Contraception and Reproductive MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full text2 citedEpidemiology & public healthPMC
  2. Beyond the Patient: Healthcare Providers’ Insights on Partner Engagement in Contraceptive Decision-Making
    Patricia N. E Roberson, Kendall Bradey, Angela Hiefner +4
    Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcarePeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textEpidemiology & public healthPMC
  3. Exploring male involvement and support in long-acting reversible contraceptive decision-making: a mixed-methods cross-sectional study in Kampala, Uganda.
    Brian Nyasulu, Nicholas Ngomi, Ronald Arineitwe Kibonire
    Contraception and reproductive medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMC
  4. Women’s fertility awareness and decision making around perceived or estimated post-ovulation emergency contraceptive use: a narrative review
    Ravi Yadav, Nilanjan Dutta
    Middle East Fertility Society JournalPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthDOAJ
  5. Factors influencing individual decision-making in contraceptive method selection: a comprehensive analysis.
    Zhiqiu Cao, Juan Li, Li Sun +4
    Contraception and reproductive medicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{garg2026beyond,
  title = {{Beyond women’s burden: integrating male partners into contraceptive decision-making}},
  author = {Priyanka Garg and Mishu Mangla},
  journal = {Contraception and Reproductive Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1186/s40834-026-00465-9},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-026-00465-9},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Beyond women’s burden: integrating male partners into contraceptive decision-making
AU  - Priyanka Garg
AU  - Mishu Mangla
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
JO  - Contraception and Reproductive Medicine
DO  - 10.1186/s40834-026-00465-9
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-026-00465-9
AB  - Background Contraceptive use and family planning have traditionally been viewed as women’s responsibility, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Despite growing evidence highlighting the positive impact of male involvement in improving contraceptive uptake, continuation, and reproductive health outcomes, the participation of male partners remains limited. This review explores the critical role of male partners in contraceptive decision-making and synthesizes current evidence on the barriers impeding their participation. It further identifies strategies and interventions to foster shared responsibility in family planning and promote equitable reproductive health practices. Methods A narrative review approach was adopted to collate global and regional evidence from peer-reviewed literature, policy reports, and relevant case studies. The review is structured around five core themes: sociocultural and gender norms, knowledge and educational barriers, limitations within healthcare systems, misconceptions around male contraceptive methods, and systemic challenges to implementation. The review also presents innovative, context-sensitive strategies for male engagement and future directions to enhance male participation in family planning. Results The analysis reveals that male involvement remains suboptimal due to persistent patriarchal norms, misinformation, stigma, and limited access to male-centric contraceptive options. Existing family planning programs often lack couple-focused counseling and fail to provide inclusive services for men. However, interventions such as couple-based education, male-friendly clinics, community advocacy, gamified digital tools, and AI-enabled reproductive health platforms show promise in shifting attitudes and improving engagement. Success stories from countries including Tanzania, Vietnam, and India provide evidence for scalable, culturally adaptive models that facilitate male involvement. Conclusion Strengthening male participation is pivotal for achieving equitable reproductive health outcomes. Multi-level strategies, such as spanning education, service delivery, community norms, and policy integration, are essential to promote shared responsibility. Addressing systemic barriers, expanding male contraceptive choices, and leveraging technology can catalyze behavioral change and contribute to more inclusive, effective, and sustainable family planning programs.
SN  - 2055-7426
ER  -