Comparison of 3D Multiecho in Steady-State Acquisition and STIR Sequences in Brachial Plexus MR Neurography
- 1From the Department of Radiology and Imaging (A.S.L., D.B.S., J.L., P.G.C., E.T.T.), Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
- 2Department of Biostatistics (S.-H.W.), Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
- 3GE HealthCare (Y.W., M.F.), New York, New York
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The short-tau inversion recovery fast spin echo (STIR-FSE) pulse sequence is commonly used for 3D magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) of the brachial plexus (BP) due to its low B0 susceptibility and robust fat suppression. An alternative 3D acquisition is a multi-echo in steady-state acquisition (MENSA-NERVE) sequence that typically provides more robust vascular suppression, but poorer fat suppression due to its use of a water excitation pulse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 50 subjects (24 female, median age [range]: 34 years [14-73]) who underwent unilateral BP MRN at 3-Telsa where non-contrast STIR-FSE and MENSA-NERVE were sequentially acquired and retrospectively analyzed. Sequences were assessed by 2 radiologists for vascular suppression, fat suppression, and visualization of the BP nerve roots, trunks, and cords as well as of the suprascapular nerve and axillary nerve. Pooled measurements were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and agreement proportion was used to assess inter-rater/inter-sequence diagnostic agreement. RESULTS: MENSA-NERVE outperformed STIR-FSE for vascular suppression (p<0.001). Fat suppression assessments favored STIR-FSE over MENSA-NERVE (p=0.05 to <0.001), with incomplete fat suppression obscuring nerve visualization in MENSA-NERVE primarily observed only at the lung apex. MENSA-NERVE provided superior visualization of the suprascapular and axillary nerves (p=0.004 to <0.001). Interrater agreement of visualized pathology was good to excellent (agreement=0.74-0.92) for both sequences. Inter-sequence agreement was also excellent (agreement=0.80-0.88). CONCLUSION: MENSA-NERVE provided superior vascular suppression and nerve conspicuity as compared to non-contrast STIR-FSE and with less robust fat suppression at the neck-shoulder junction and lung apex.
Related
- Comparison of Clinical Efficacy and Postoperative Outcomes of Ultrasound-Guided Lateral Sagittal Infraclavicular and Costoclavicular Brachial Plexus Blocks: A Retrospective Cohort Study
- Single-Acquisition Spectral and Ultra-High-Resolution Pediatric Head CT: Phantom Comparison of Deep-Silicon Photon-Counting and Energy-Integrating Detectors
- Low-kV high-pitch one-scan aortic and coronary CT angiography using dual-source photon-counting CT: comparison with separate acquisition strategies.
- Diffusion tensor MR neurography reveals altered sciatic and tibial nerve microstructure in chronic dialysis patients.
- The clinical efficacy of magnetic resonance neurography-assisted percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy.
BibTeX
@article{lowe2026comparison,
title = {{Comparison of 3D Multiecho in Steady-State Acquisition and STIR Sequences in Brachial Plexus MR Neurography}},
author = {Allison S. Lowe and Darryl B. Sneag and Ji Lin and Philip G. Colucci and Shu-Han Wang and Yan Wen and Maggie Fung and Ek T. Tan},
journal = {AJNR: American Journal of Neuroradiology},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.3174/ajnr.a9328},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a9328},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Comparison of 3D Multiecho in Steady-State Acquisition and STIR Sequences in Brachial Plexus MR Neurography
AU - Allison S. Lowe
AU - Darryl B. Sneag
AU - Ji Lin
AU - Philip G. Colucci
AU - Shu-Han Wang
AU - Yan Wen
AU - Maggie Fung
AU - Ek T. Tan
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/06
JO - AJNR: American Journal of Neuroradiology
DO - 10.3174/ajnr.a9328
UR - https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a9328
AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The short-tau inversion recovery fast spin echo (STIR-FSE) pulse sequence is commonly used for 3D magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) of the brachial plexus (BP) due to its low B0 susceptibility and robust fat suppression. An alternative 3D acquisition is a multi-echo in steady-state acquisition (MENSA-NERVE) sequence that typically provides more robust vascular suppression, but poorer fat suppression due to its use of a water excitation pulse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 50 subjects (24 female, median age [range]: 34 years [14-73]) who underwent unilateral BP MRN at 3-Telsa where non-contrast STIR-FSE and MENSA-NERVE were sequentially acquired and retrospectively analyzed. Sequences were assessed by 2 radiologists for vascular suppression, fat suppression, and visualization of the BP nerve roots, trunks, and cords as well as of the suprascapular nerve and axillary nerve. Pooled measurements were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and agreement proportion was used to assess inter-rater/inter-sequence diagnostic agreement. RESULTS: MENSA-NERVE outperformed STIR-FSE for vascular suppression (p<0.001). Fat suppression assessments favored STIR-FSE over MENSA-NERVE (p=0.05 to <0.001), with incomplete fat suppression obscuring nerve visualization in MENSA-NERVE primarily observed only at the lung apex. MENSA-NERVE provided superior visualization of the suprascapular and axillary nerves (p=0.004 to <0.001). Interrater agreement of visualized pathology was good to excellent (agreement=0.74-0.92) for both sequences. Inter-sequence agreement was also excellent (agreement=0.80-0.88). CONCLUSION: MENSA-NERVE provided superior vascular suppression and nerve conspicuity as compared to non-contrast STIR-FSE and with less robust fat suppression at the neck-shoulder junction and lung apex.
SN - 0195-6108
SN - 1936-959X
ER -