Developing a Conceptual Framework: Integrating Tumour, Macroenvironment and Resource (TMR) as a Composite Determinant of Ovarian Cancer Outcome in Diverse Resource Settings
- 1Teesside Ovarian Oncology Research Group (TORCH), Department of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospital Tees, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, UK
- 2Kolkata Gynecological Oncology Trials and Translational Research Group (KolGOTRG), Kolkata 700156, India
- 3Faculty of Society and Culture, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK
Abstract
Background: Ovarian cancer (OC) poses an escalating global health burden, with marked disparities in incidence, mortality, and survivorship. Social, psychological, and structural determinants, including deprivation, stigma, and access to specialist care, may influence outcomes but are not well-represented in existing models of cancer care. We introduce the Tumour, Macroenvironment and Resource (TMR) framework, a novel conceptual model exploring interactions among tumour biology, social determinants, and healthcare resources in OC survivorship and care. Methods: Framework development occurred in three phases. First, a narrative review identified factors influencing OC outcomes across tumour, macroenvironmental, and healthcare resource domains. Second, multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) was used to structure these factors within a preliminary framework and assign indicative domain weightings. Third, two cross-sectional expert opinion surveys were conducted to refine and validate the concept of the framework. The final model was then evaluated in a retrospective pilot cohort to assess the feasibility of collecting predefined TMR variables from routinely available clinical data. Results: The review identified limited evidence addressing broader determinants of health beyond biological prognostic factors. Available studies suggested interactions between tumour characteristics, social determinants, and healthcare infrastructure that may influence outcomes. A preliminary model allocated 50% weighting to tumour factors and 50% to combined macroenvironmental and healthcare resource factors. Expert surveys (n = 20 and n = 44) achieved consensus and informed development of the final TMR framework. Application to a UK pilot cohort of patients with OC (n = 42) demonstrated the feasibility of collecting variables across all TMR domains and identified multiple adverse factors across tumour, macroenvironmental, and resource domains. Conclusions: The TMR framework provides an integrative, hypothesis-generating model for exploring disparities in OC survivorship and care. Further retrospective and prospective validation are required before clinical or prognostic applications can be considered.
Related
- The cingulate–mitochondrial–resonome axis: a conceptual framework integrating rehabilitation, interoception, and affective–motor processing in canine chronic pain
- Integrating Real-World Evidence, Patient-Reported Outcomes and Health Economics into Evidence-Based Public Health-A Narrative Review and Conceptual Framework.
- Clinical Reasoning, Pathophysiology, and Artificial Intelligence in Critical Care: A Conceptual Framework for Integrating Decision-Making
- Lip Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Conceptual Framework for Integrating Molecular, Immune and Microenvironmental Drivers
- Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Rural Eastern Cape: Integrating Whole-Genome Sequencing, Conceptual Transmission Modelling and Community-Based Participatory Research
BibTeX
@article{mukhopadhyay2026developing,
title = {{Developing a Conceptual Framework: Integrating Tumour, Macroenvironment and Resource (TMR) as a Composite Determinant of Ovarian Cancer Outcome in Diverse Resource Settings}},
author = {Asima Mukhopadhyay and Adam Ruddock and Mohamed Elsebaei and Ally Memon and Daity Bhattacharjee and on behalf of the Tumour-Macroenvironment-Resource (TMR) Global Review Group},
journal = {Cancers},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/cancers18203299},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/18/20/3299},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Developing a Conceptual Framework: Integrating Tumour, Macroenvironment and Resource (TMR) as a Composite Determinant of Ovarian Cancer Outcome in Diverse Resource Settings
AU - Asima Mukhopadhyay
AU - Adam Ruddock
AU - Mohamed Elsebaei
AU - Ally Memon
AU - Daity Bhattacharjee
AU - on behalf of the Tumour-Macroenvironment-Resource (TMR) Global Review Group
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - Cancers
DO - 10.3390/cancers18203299
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/18/20/3299
AB - Background: Ovarian cancer (OC) poses an escalating global health burden, with marked disparities in incidence, mortality, and survivorship. Social, psychological, and structural determinants, including deprivation, stigma, and access to specialist care, may influence outcomes but are not well-represented in existing models of cancer care. We introduce the Tumour, Macroenvironment and Resource (TMR) framework, a novel conceptual model exploring interactions among tumour biology, social determinants, and healthcare resources in OC survivorship and care. Methods: Framework development occurred in three phases. First, a narrative review identified factors influencing OC outcomes across tumour, macroenvironmental, and healthcare resource domains. Second, multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) was used to structure these factors within a preliminary framework and assign indicative domain weightings. Third, two cross-sectional expert opinion surveys were conducted to refine and validate the concept of the framework. The final model was then evaluated in a retrospective pilot cohort to assess the feasibility of collecting predefined TMR variables from routinely available clinical data. Results: The review identified limited evidence addressing broader determinants of health beyond biological prognostic factors. Available studies suggested interactions between tumour characteristics, social determinants, and healthcare infrastructure that may influence outcomes. A preliminary model allocated 50% weighting to tumour factors and 50% to combined macroenvironmental and healthcare resource factors. Expert surveys (n = 20 and n = 44) achieved consensus and informed development of the final TMR framework. Application to a UK pilot cohort of patients with OC (n = 42) demonstrated the feasibility of collecting variables across all TMR domains and identified multiple adverse factors across tumour, macroenvironmental, and resource domains. Conclusions: The TMR framework provides an integrative, hypothesis-generating model for exploring disparities in OC survivorship and care. Further retrospective and prospective validation are required before clinical or prognostic applications can be considered.
SN - 2072-6694
ER -