Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,123 studies31 sourcesUpdated 50 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

(2-dep,Σ)-categories are not generalised categories with families

Abstract

The notion of a generalised category with families, introduced by Coraglia and Emmenegger is one of the most general notions introduced to capture categorically the notion of dependent typing. It is shown that these generalised categories with families are biequivalent to comprehension categories. We will show that the notion of a (2-dep,Σ)-category, an extension of the notion of a (dep,Σ)-category, introduced by Petrakis, is not biequivalent to generalised categories with families, but instead is equivalent to a direct generalisation of that notion.

Related

  1. Large-time existence for a generalised Serre-Green-Naghdi (Debyaoui-Ersoy) model with variable width and slowly varying bottom
    Mehmet Ersoy
    HALPreprintPublisher termsFull textGeneral mathematicsHAL
  2. Generalised Cone Conjecture, III: Non-generic Sakai surfaces
    Vladimir Lazić, Isabel Stenger, Zhixin Xie
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  3. Campana strong approximation on generalised Markoff surfaces
    Dasheng Wei
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  4. Mumford--Morita--Miller classes in generalised cohomology theories
    Oscar Randal-Williams
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryGeometry & topologyarXiv
  5. Feeling the generalised rough SABR boundary
    Masaaki Fukasawa, Antoine Jacquier, Mugad Oumgari
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textProbabilityarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{gambarte20262depσcategories,
  title = {{(2-dep,$Σ$)-categories are not generalised categories with families}},
  author = {Luis Gambarte},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.01869},
  eprint = {2609.01869},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.01869},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - (2-dep,Σ)-categories are not generalised categories with families
AU  - Luis Gambarte
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/01
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.01869
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.01869
AB  - The notion of a generalised category with families, introduced by Coraglia and Emmenegger is one of the most general notions introduced to capture categorically the notion of dependent typing. It is shown that these generalised categories with families are biequivalent to comprehension categories. We will show that the notion of a (2-dep,Σ)-category, an extension of the notion of a (dep,Σ)-category, introduced by Petrakis, is not biequivalent to generalised categories with families, but instead is equivalent to a direct generalisation of that notion.
ER  -