Peer-reviewedCC BYeNeuro
Do Not Forget the Stimulus: A Missing Control in Naturalistic Studies of Neural Entrainment
Abstract
A main question in cognitive neuroscience is whether brain rhythms during speech perception reflect intrinsic neural oscillations or simply responses evoked by the acoustic signal. A recent intracranial study interpreted persistent auditory activity after acoustic edges as evidence for entrainment. We show that a similar rhythmic pattern is already present in the speech stimulus itself, supporting an evoked-response account instead. This highlights the need for routine stimulus-signal analyses as a critical control in studies of naturalistic speech processing.
Related
- U-statistics-based Pairwise Discordance Regression for Joint Mean-Variability Inference in Longitudinal Studies with Missing Data
- Predictive averaging and Rubin’s rule-based model pooling to predict survival risk with imputations in the presence of missing patient data: methodology and verification using two case studies and simulations
- Association between the CCR2-V64I polymorphism and cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis of 20 case-control studies
- A prediction-interval framework for identifying outlier control cohorts in lifespan studies
- Entrainment of prefrontal theta synchrony increases interbrain coupling and enhances social interaction in mouse models of autism
BibTeX
@article{lopezmadrona2026forget,
title = {{Do Not Forget the Stimulus: A Missing Control in Naturalistic Studies of Neural Entrainment}},
author = {Víctor López-Madrona and Jacques Pesnot Lerousseau and Benjamin Morillon},
journal = {eNeuro},
year = {2026},
month = jun,
doi = {10.1523/eneuro.0451-25.2026},
url = {https://hal.science/hal-05776293v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Do Not Forget the Stimulus: A Missing Control in Naturalistic Studies of Neural Entrainment
AU - Víctor López-Madrona
AU - Jacques Pesnot Lerousseau
AU - Benjamin Morillon
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/06/26
JO - eNeuro
DO - 10.1523/eneuro.0451-25.2026
UR - https://hal.science/hal-05776293v1
AB - A main question in cognitive neuroscience is whether brain rhythms during speech perception reflect intrinsic neural oscillations or simply responses evoked by the acoustic signal. A recent intracranial study interpreted persistent auditory activity after acoustic edges as evidence for entrainment. We show that a similar rhythmic pattern is already present in the speech stimulus itself, supporting an evoked-response account instead. This highlights the need for routine stimulus-signal analyses as a critical control in studies of naturalistic speech processing.
SN - 2373-2822
ER -