Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 48 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYBrain and behavior

The Cognitive Functions of Youth With Obesity: A Meta-Analysis.

8 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
  2. 2Department of Psychology, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan.
  3. 3School of Post Baccalaureate Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
  4. 4Division of Pediatric Neurology, China Medical University Children's Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
  5. 5Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
  6. 6Center for Prevention and Treatment of Internet Addiction, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan.
  7. 7Clinical Psychology Center, Asia University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
  8. 8Department of Occupational Safety and Health, College of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.

Abstract

Background

This meta-analysis examined the associations between obesity and performance across seven cognitive domains (inhibition, cognitive flexibility, working memory, verbal fluency, planning, attention, and intelligence quotient [IQ]) in youth under 18 years. Developmental stage (school-aged children vs. adolescents) and sample sex composition examined as moderators. Evidence on executive function in youth with comorbid obesity and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was synthesized qualitatively.Methods

Following PRISMA guidelines, 22 studies comparing youth with obesity to normal-weight peers were included. Effect sizes (Hedges' g) were pooled using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses compared school-aged children and adolescents; meta-regression examined age and proportion of female participants as study-level moderators.Results

Youth with obesity performed significantly worse than normal-weight peers on inhibition (g⁺ = -0.193), cognitive flexibility (g⁺ = -0.499), working memory (g⁺ = -0.652), verbal fluency (g⁺ = -0.420), attention (g⁺ = -0.526), and IQ (g⁺ = -0.288); planning could not be estimated. School-aged children showed deficits on inhibition, working memory, and attention; adolescents on working memory and attention only. Between-subgroup tests were non-significant for all domains (p ≥ 0.26), so developmental differences should be interpreted with caution. Meta-regression showed that a higher proportion of female participants in a study sample, a study-level characteristic rather than an individual-level effect, was associated with larger working memory deficits (p = 0.002); age did not moderate any domain. Two ADHD-comorbidity studies received qualitative synthesis only.Discussion

Obesity is associated with poorer cognitive performance in youth across several domains, with sex composition of the study sample emerging as a moderator of the working memory finding; differences between school-aged children and adolescents were not significant and should be interpreted cautiously. Substantial heterogeneity, predominantly observational designs, inconsistent BMI criteria, and limited ADHD-stratified data constrain causal inference. Future studies should standardize weight definitions, report age- and ADHD-stratified data, and consider bidirectional pathways.

Related

  1. Balancing clinical benefits and behavioral risks of obesity-focused management in youth-onset type 2 diabetes: A narrative review
    Rutha Chivate, Caroline Christian, Abigail Hartman +3
    TouchREVIEWS in endocrinologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEndocrinology & metabolismEurope PMCPMC
  2. A study protocol for rural tribal school partnerships for the primary prevention of obesity among American Indian youth (P2)
    Regina Eddie, Velia Leybas Nuño, Brenda Charley +6
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossrefDOAJ
  3. Association Between Consumption of Foods Classified by Chewiness Level and Overweight/Obesity Among Israeli Adolescents: Insights from a Cross-Sectional National Youth Survey
    Tzach Itzhak Gil, Tali Sinai, Chen Dor +1
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0NutritionCrossref
  4. Mechanistic Link of Obesity to Depression and Cognitive Decline in Alzheimer’s Disease
    Kwabena Kusi-Mensah, Nathan Jones, Humza Haroon +2
    Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviewsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textPsychiatry & mental healthPMC
  5. The associations between dynapenic obesity and cognitive disorder in older hypertension patients: a multicenter cross-sectional study
    Pingping An, Juxiao Wu, Yijing Zhang +4
    Frontiers in public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{lin2026cognitive,
  title = {{The Cognitive Functions of Youth With Obesity: A Meta-Analysis.}},
  author = {Yi-Chun Lin and Chia-Chia Chang and Yu-Tzu Chang and Wei-Lin Liu and Yu-Chi Liao and Ro-Ting Lin},
  journal = {Brain and behavior},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1002/brb3.71884},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42968408},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The Cognitive Functions of Youth With Obesity: A Meta-Analysis.
AU  - Yi-Chun Lin
AU  - Chia-Chia Chang
AU  - Yu-Tzu Chang
AU  - Wei-Lin Liu
AU  - Yu-Chi Liao
AU  - Ro-Ting Lin
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/01
JO  - Brain and behavior
DO  - 10.1002/brb3.71884
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42968408
AB  - Background  This meta-analysis examined the associations between obesity and performance across seven cognitive domains (inhibition, cognitive flexibility, working memory, verbal fluency, planning, attention, and intelligence quotient [IQ]) in youth under 18 years. Developmental stage (school-aged children vs. adolescents) and sample sex composition examined as moderators. Evidence on executive function in youth with comorbid obesity and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was synthesized qualitatively.Methods  Following PRISMA guidelines, 22 studies comparing youth with obesity to normal-weight peers were included. Effect sizes (Hedges' g) were pooled using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses compared school-aged children and adolescents; meta-regression examined age and proportion of female participants as study-level moderators.Results  Youth with obesity performed significantly worse than normal-weight peers on inhibition (g⁺ = -0.193), cognitive flexibility (g⁺ = -0.499), working memory (g⁺ = -0.652), verbal fluency (g⁺ = -0.420), attention (g⁺ = -0.526), and IQ (g⁺ = -0.288); planning could not be estimated. School-aged children showed deficits on inhibition, working memory, and attention; adolescents on working memory and attention only. Between-subgroup tests were non-significant for all domains (p ≥ 0.26), so developmental differences should be interpreted with caution. Meta-regression showed that a higher proportion of female participants in a study sample, a study-level characteristic rather than an individual-level effect, was associated with larger working memory deficits (p = 0.002); age did not moderate any domain. Two ADHD-comorbidity studies received qualitative synthesis only.Discussion  Obesity is associated with poorer cognitive performance in youth across several domains, with sex composition of the study sample emerging as a moderator of the working memory finding; differences between school-aged children and adolescents were not significant and should be interpreted cautiously. Substantial heterogeneity, predominantly observational designs, inconsistent BMI criteria, and limited ADHD-stratified data constrain causal inference. Future studies should standardize weight definitions, report age- and ADHD-stratified data, and consider bidirectional pathways.
SN  - 2162-3279
ER  -