Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
181,713 studies31 sourcesUpdated 10 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Hyperbolic comparison and rigidity for the hyperspherical radius

Abstract

We prove Gromov's hyperbolic hyperspherical radius comparison and rigidity conjectures in all dimensions n≥3, without the spin assumption. Let (Xn, g) be a smooth, oriented, connected, compact Riemannian manifold with nonempty smooth connected boundary S. If Scg≥ −n(n−1) and HS≥ (n−1)coth R for some R>0, then Rad(S,gS)≤sinh R, with equality if and only if (Xn,g) is isometric to the closed hyperbolic geodesic ball of radius R. Under the same curvature bounds, every smooth $1$-Lipschitz map of nonzero degree from S to the boundary of the hyperbolic geodesic ball of radius R extends to an isometry of the fillings. Here, gS is the induced boundary metric, HS is the mean curvature of S with respect to the outward unit normal, and Rad(S,gS) denotes the hyperspherical radius.

Related

  1. Rigidity from the strong unstable foliation for higher-dimensional Anosov and partially hyperbolic flows
    Andrey Gogolev
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textDynamical systemsarXiv
  2. Local unmarked length spectrum rigidity for hyperbolic surfaces
    Tristan Humbert
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsDynamical systemsarXiv
  3. Scalar--Mean Rigidity for Hyperbolic Balls in Dimensions 2≤ n≤ 5
    Chenghang Lu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeometry & topologyarXiv
  4. Mean dimension and radius of comparison
    George A. Elliott, Zhuang Niu
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  5. Rigidity Theorems for the Weyl Problem of Convex Surfaces in Hyperbolic 3-Space
    Xinrong Zhao
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeometry & topologyarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{jiang2026hyperbolic,
  title = {{Hyperbolic comparison and rigidity for the hyperspherical radius}},
  author = {Xumin Jiang and Zhehui Wang},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.28450},
  eprint = {2610.28450},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28450},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Hyperbolic comparison and rigidity for the hyperspherical radius
AU  - Xumin Jiang
AU  - Zhehui Wang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/20
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.28450
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28450
AB  - We prove Gromov's hyperbolic hyperspherical radius comparison and rigidity conjectures in all dimensions n≥3, without the spin assumption. Let (X^n, g) be a smooth, oriented, connected, compact Riemannian manifold with nonempty smooth connected boundary S. If Sc_g≥ −n(n−1) and H_S≥ (n−1)coth R for some R>0, then Rad(S,g_S)≤sinh R, with equality if and only if (X^n,g) is isometric to the closed hyperbolic geodesic ball of radius R. Under the same curvature bounds, every smooth $1$-Lipschitz map of nonzero degree from S to the boundary of the hyperbolic geodesic ball of radius R extends to an isometry of the fillings. Here, g_S is the induced boundary metric, H_S is the mean curvature of S with respect to the outward unit normal, and Rad(S,g_S) denotes the hyperspherical radius.
ER  -