Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
181,716 studies31 sourcesUpdated just now
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

An upper bound of 61 for the Ramsey number $R(3,3,3,3)$

Abstract

We improve the upper bound on the classical Ramsey number $R(3,3,3,3)$ from 62 to 61. The proof is based on a global incidence count, classifications of small neighborhoods and exhaustive SAT computations. We formalize the mathematical reductions in Lean and refute every resulting formula with two SAT solvers.

Related

  1. An Improved Upper Bound for Multicolour Ramsey Numbers
    Sunghyeon Jo
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  2. A General Upper Bound on Multicolor Ordered Ramsey Numbers
    Martin Balko, Klára Grinerová
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  3. A double-logarithmic upper bound on the chromatic number of the associahedron
    Sang-il Oum, David R. Wood
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  4. The Tight Upper Bound on the Number of Distinct Squares in Circular Words
    Rikuya Hamai
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  5. An improved upper bound on the chromatic number of the n-dimensional sphere
    A. I. Bikeev, V. A. Voronov, A. M. Raigorodskii
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{tatarevic2026upper,
  title = {{An upper bound of 61 for the Ramsey number $R(3,3,3,3)$}},
  author = {Milos Tatarevic},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.36648},
  eprint = {2610.36648},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36648},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - An upper bound of 61 for the Ramsey number $R(3,3,3,3)$
AU  - Milos Tatarevic
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/27
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.36648
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36648
AB  - We improve the upper bound on the classical Ramsey number $R(3,3,3,3)$ from 62 to 61. The proof is based on a global incidence count, classifications of small neighborhoods and exhaustive SAT computations. We formalize the mathematical reductions in Lean and refute every resulting formula with two SAT solvers.
ER  -