Sit-and-wait foraging is not enough in food-deprived environments: evidence from groundwater and salamanders
Abstract
Foraging strategies are fundamental traits that characterize predators, with strong differences between sit-and-wait predators and active-searching predators. Optimal foraging theory predicts that environmental conditions affect the efficiency of these strategies, with active predators being favoured when prey are scarce and difficult to detect. Subterranean habitats are ideal models to study the effectiveness of foraging strategies. Laboratory studies on fish and salamander predators showed that active foraging often characterizes cave-adapted species, but field studies demonstrating the advantages of active foraging for growth and survival are lacking. In this study, we assessed how predators displaying a sitand-wait strategy can cope with the variable costs of foraging under different ecological contexts, such as cave and surface environments. We performed a cross-environment experiment that was repeated in 3 years by rearing salamander, Salamandra salamandra, larvae from caves and surface streams in cages placed in both surface and cave environments. We measured larval growth (weight and total length) repeatedly every 10e20 days, from March to July, and assessed water temperature variation, prey availability and metamorphosis achievement in the rearing sites. Larvae in stream cages grew larger than larvae in subterranean cages, which showed negative growth. Our results suggest that the sit-and-wait strategy does not provide enough prey for development in cave environments, irrespective of larvae origin. In food-deprived environments, active foraging is necessary to obtain the energy required for the basic functions of the organisms exploiting them
Related
- Quantitative evidence for foraging preferences of shrill carder bumble bee (Bombus sylvarum) queens
- Baseline growth rate shapes pollutant impacts in aquatic environments: Evidence from antibiotic responses in the harmful cyanobacterium Microcystis
- Accurate automated photo-identification of Near Eastern and European fire salamanders
- Range-wide validation of reduced locomotor endurance in unisexual Ambystoma salamanders
- Exploring the Abiotic and Biotic drivers of uneven Species Richness in Salamanders and Newts
BibTeX
@article{manenti2026sitandwait,
title = {{Sit-and-wait foraging is not enough in food-deprived environments: evidence from groundwater and salamanders}},
author = {Raoul Manenti and Lodovica Vinci and Benedetta Barzaghi and Bianca Lombardi and Chiara Teodoro and Luca Baglioni and Andrea Melotto and Gentile Francesco Ficetola},
journal = {Animal Behaviour},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1016/j.anbehav.2023.11.005},
url = {https://hal.science/hal-04893529v1},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Sit-and-wait foraging is not enough in food-deprived environments: evidence from groundwater and salamanders
AU - Raoul Manenti
AU - Lodovica Vinci
AU - Benedetta Barzaghi
AU - Bianca Lombardi
AU - Chiara Teodoro
AU - Luca Baglioni
AU - Andrea Melotto
AU - Gentile Francesco Ficetola
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/30
JO - Animal Behaviour
DO - 10.1016/j.anbehav.2023.11.005
UR - https://hal.science/hal-04893529v1
AB - Foraging strategies are fundamental traits that characterize predators, with strong differences between sit-and-wait predators and active-searching predators. Optimal foraging theory predicts that environmental conditions affect the efficiency of these strategies, with active predators being favoured when prey are scarce and difficult to detect. Subterranean habitats are ideal models to study the effectiveness of foraging strategies. Laboratory studies on fish and salamander predators showed that active foraging often characterizes cave-adapted species, but field studies demonstrating the advantages of active foraging for growth and survival are lacking. In this study, we assessed how predators displaying a sitand-wait strategy can cope with the variable costs of foraging under different ecological contexts, such as cave and surface environments. We performed a cross-environment experiment that was repeated in 3 years by rearing salamander, Salamandra salamandra, larvae from caves and surface streams in cages placed in both surface and cave environments. We measured larval growth (weight and total length) repeatedly every 10e20 days, from March to July, and assessed water temperature variation, prey availability and metamorphosis achievement in the rearing sites. Larvae in stream cages grew larger than larvae in subterranean cages, which showed negative growth. Our results suggest that the sit-and-wait strategy does not provide enough prey for development in cave environments, irrespective of larvae origin. In food-deprived environments, active foraging is necessary to obtain the energy required for the basic functions of the organisms exploiting them
SN - 0003-3472
SN - 1095-8282
ER -