CT Versus Ultrasound in Young Women With Right Iliac Fossa Pain: A Single‐Centre Retrospective Study
4 affiliations
- 1John Radcliffe Hospital Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Oxford UK
- 2Buckinghamshire NHS Trust Plastics Surgery Department Stoke Mandeville Hospital Aylesbury Buckinghamshire UK
- 3Medical Sciences Division Office, Level 3, Academic Centre University of Oxford Medical School Oxford UK
- 4Division of Protein & Nucleic Acid Chemistry MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology Cambridge UK
Abstract
Background: Acute right iliac fossa (RIF) pain is a common presentation in premenopausal women. Compared with men, women are less likely to undergo abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) and are twice as likely to have a negative diagnostic laparoscopy for appendicitis. However, CT exposes patients to significant ionising radiation—2 years of background exposure—raising lifetime cancer risk to one in 3700. Imaging decisions in this cohort are therefore clinically complex. This study investigated whether rates of negative diagnostic laparoscopy differ between women who underwent no imaging, ultrasound (US), or CT.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed women aged 16–55 years presenting with acute RIF pain over a 2‐year period at a tertiary referral centre who underwent laparoscopic appendicectomy. Data collected included imaging modality and findings, histopathological diagnosis, initial fever, WCC and CRP. The reference standard was histopathologically confirmed appendicitis. Diagnostic performance of CT and US was assessed using positive predictive value (PPV) and sensitivity.
Results: We identified 502 women, of whom 421 underwent imaging. CT only was performed in 238 patients, US only in 177, both modalities in 6, and 81 had no imaging. US scans were more frequently inconclusive than CT (130 vs. 11). Appendicitis was confirmed histologically in 68.1% of unscanned patients, 48.1% following US and 86.6% following CT. CT demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy (PPV 92.5%, sensitivity 96.4%) than US (PPV 75.0%, sensitivity 35.5%). Negative appendicectomy rates were significantly higher following US. Raised CRP and WCC correlated with positive histopathology and CT results but less consistently with positive US. Fever was rare (11) and did not correlate with any of the groups.
Conclusion: In young women, the risk of negative laparoscopy must be balanced against radiation exposure from CT. CT or clinical assessment alone may reduce unnecessary appendicectomies compared with US.
Related
- Ultrasound guidance versus near-infrared light versus the standard technique for first-attempt success of peripheral intravenous catheterisation in adults with difficult venous access in a medical imaging department (RÉUSSIR-VVP): protocol for a single-centre, three arms, randomised controlled trial
- Clinical profile, risk factors and in-hospital outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in young versus older adults: a 5-year retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care centre in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
- Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Total Disc Replacement with a Viscoelastic Prosthesis for Single-Level Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease in Young Adults: A Comparative Retrospective Cohort Study
- Epidural Abscess in Routine Preoperative MRI Reports Versus Documented Operative Findings, and Exploratory Mortality Risk Factors in Surgically Treated Spondylodiscitis: A Retrospective Single-Centre Study
- No significant clinical advantage of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic fundoplication was observed in this single-centre retrospective cohort
BibTeX
@article{pathak2026versus,
title = {{CT Versus Ultrasound in Young Women With Right Iliac Fossa Pain: A Single‐Centre Retrospective Study}},
author = {Anna Pathak and Xinyue Jiang and Jedrzej J. Jaworski and Mohamed Shams and Phill Pearce},
journal = {Anz Journal of Surgery},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1111/ans.70854},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70854},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - CT Versus Ultrasound in Young Women With Right Iliac Fossa Pain: A Single‐Centre Retrospective Study
AU - Anna Pathak
AU - Xinyue Jiang
AU - Jedrzej J. Jaworski
AU - Mohamed Shams
AU - Phill Pearce
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/12
JO - Anz Journal of Surgery
DO - 10.1111/ans.70854
UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70854
AB - Background: Acute right iliac fossa (RIF) pain is a common presentation in premenopausal women. Compared with men, women are less likely to undergo abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) and are twice as likely to have a negative diagnostic laparoscopy for appendicitis. However, CT exposes patients to significant ionising radiation—2 years of background exposure—raising lifetime cancer risk to one in 3700. Imaging decisions in this cohort are therefore clinically complex. This study investigated whether rates of negative diagnostic laparoscopy differ between women who underwent no imaging, ultrasound (US), or CT. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed women aged 16–55 years presenting with acute RIF pain over a 2‐year period at a tertiary referral centre who underwent laparoscopic appendicectomy. Data collected included imaging modality and findings, histopathological diagnosis, initial fever, WCC and CRP. The reference standard was histopathologically confirmed appendicitis. Diagnostic performance of CT and US was assessed using positive predictive value (PPV) and sensitivity. Results: We identified 502 women, of whom 421 underwent imaging. CT only was performed in 238 patients, US only in 177, both modalities in 6, and 81 had no imaging. US scans were more frequently inconclusive than CT (130 vs. 11). Appendicitis was confirmed histologically in 68.1% of unscanned patients, 48.1% following US and 86.6% following CT. CT demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy (PPV 92.5%, sensitivity 96.4%) than US (PPV 75.0%, sensitivity 35.5%). Negative appendicectomy rates were significantly higher following US. Raised CRP and WCC correlated with positive histopathology and CT results but less consistently with positive US. Fever was rare (11) and did not correlate with any of the groups. Conclusion: In young women, the risk of negative laparoscopy must be balanced against radiation exposure from CT. CT or clinical assessment alone may reduce unnecessary appendicectomies compared with US.
SN - 1445-1433
SN - 1445-2197
ER -