Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
193,349 studies31 sourcesUpdated 2 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

A Partial Duty Formulation for Crew Scheduling

Abstract

We consider a crew scheduling problem with a break, working time, and duty length constraint. It is common to solve crew scheduling problems with a diving heuristic, using column generation to solve the LP relaxation of a set partitioning formulation where variables correspond with duties. We prove that computing the LP bound of this formulation is weakly NP-hard, and propose an alternative formulation based on partial duties, whose LP bound can be computed in polynomial time. We prove the same complexity results for the corresponding pricing problems. However, the partial duty formulation has a weaker LP bound. To overcome this issue, we introduce compatibility cuts which completely recover the loss in LP bound. While separation can be done efficiently, we prove that the corresponding pricing problem after separation is weakly NP-hard. Therefore, we also introduce two relaxed versions of the compatibility cuts. We demonstrate computational benefits by providing numerical experiments with a diving heuristic based on the partial duty formulation, in a case study on the metro network of the Rotterdam area, the Netherlands.

Related

  1. Branch and Price for Railway Crew Scheduling: Benchmark Instances and Computational Study
    Bart van Rossum
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  2. Online Packet Scheduling with Deadlines and Learning
    Gianmarco Genalti, Achraf Azize, Vianney Perchet
    HALPreprintLicence not statedGeneral mathematicsHAL
  3. Optimal Uniform-like Scheduling of Maintenance
    Yakov Genis, Igor Ushakov
    Reliability: Theory & ApplicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral mathematicsDOAJ
  4. Dropout Universality: Scaling Laws and Optimal Scheduling at the Edge-of-Chaos
    Lucas Fernandez Sarmiento
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsCondensed matterarXiv
  5. DynaSPLIT: Strong tail-optimal scheduling for the M/G/n with heavy-tailed job sizes
    Zhouzi Li, Mor Harchol-Balter, Alan Scheller-Wolf
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textProbabilityarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{dollevoet2026partial,
  title = {{A Partial Duty Formulation for Crew Scheduling}},
  author = {Twan Dollevoet and Bart van Rossum and Remy Spliet},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.24867},
  eprint = {2610.24867},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.24867},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - A Partial Duty Formulation for Crew Scheduling
AU  - Twan Dollevoet
AU  - Bart van Rossum
AU  - Remy Spliet
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/17
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.24867
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.24867
AB  - We consider a crew scheduling problem with a break, working time, and duty length constraint. It is common to solve crew scheduling problems with a diving heuristic, using column generation to solve the LP relaxation of a set partitioning formulation where variables correspond with duties. We prove that computing the LP bound of this formulation is weakly NP-hard, and propose an alternative formulation based on partial duties, whose LP bound can be computed in polynomial time. We prove the same complexity results for the corresponding pricing problems. However, the partial duty formulation has a weaker LP bound. To overcome this issue, we introduce compatibility cuts which completely recover the loss in LP bound. While separation can be done efficiently, we prove that the corresponding pricing problem after separation is weakly NP-hard. Therefore, we also introduce two relaxed versions of the compatibility cuts. We demonstrate computational benefits by providing numerical experiments with a diving heuristic based on the partial duty formulation, in a case study on the metro network of the Rotterdam area, the Netherlands.
ER  -