Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,693 studies31 sourcesUpdated 14 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYGenes

Anticipating the Next Recorded Bacterial Hosts of Plasmid-Borne Antimicrobial Resistance Genes: A Temporal Graph Analysis of Plasmid and Surveillance Data.

  1. 1Department of Basic Health Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia.

Abstract

Background/objectives

Plasmid-mediated dissemination of antimicrobial resistance genes complicates the control of bacterial infections. Identifying bacterial hosts likely to harbour these genes could guide genomic surveillance before such associations enter public databases. We investigated whether existing plasmid and surveillance data could anticipate which resistance gene-host associations would next be recorded in those databases, and which genomic features inform that prediction.Methods

We integrated 72,556 complete plasmid records and 2,116,241 surveillance isolates, encompassing 458 resistance gene alleles, 574 replicon backbones and 222 bacterial species. A temporal graph model, MobiGraph, was trained on associations recorded before a fixed cutoff and evaluated on subsequently observed associations, using candidate hosts matched for sequencing effort and phylogenetic distance. Ranking within a candidate pool was the primary outcome; threshold-free summaries are reported as secondary.Results

The observed host ranked among the ten highest-priority candidates in 42.4% of test cases; the advantage over gradient boosting on mechanistic features was confined to the ranking metrics, the two being indistinguishable on area under the precision-recall curve. Plasmid incompatibility-group compatibility, previous gene-host associations and shared relaxase classes were prominent predictive features. Across five resistance determinants, including mcr-1, blaNDM and tet(X4), 43-62% of subsequent associations were ranked within the top ten. Among recovered events, the median interval from the prediction cutoff to first recorded observation was 22.5 months. In a separate evaluation of a fixed 500-entry watch list, 65 entries were subsequently recorded as gene-host pairs over 25 months, 13.0% against an 8.2% background rate (95% CI 10.3-16.2%); because the surveillance database does not resolve the replicon, this confirmation does not extend to the predicted backbone.Conclusions

Existing plasmid and genomic surveillance records contain information that can help anticipate which resistance gene-host associations will next be recorded. Whether a newly recorded association reflects recent transfer or earlier under-sampling cannot be resolved from these data. These findings support prioritising bacterial hosts for targeted surveillance and experimental investigation of plasmid-mediated resistance dissemination.

Related

  1. Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) Surveillance: Ten Years On.
    Dame Sally C Davies
    Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of AmericaPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMicrobiologyEurope PMC
  2. Editorial: Evolution of antimicrobial resistance in intracellular bacterial pathogens: a genomic and historical perspective
    Kumaragurubaran Karthik, Maryam Dadar, Subbaiyan Anbazhagan +1
    Frontiers in MicrobiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMicrobiologyHAL
  3. Antimicrobial resistance of bacteria isolated from blood cultures at a tertiary hospital in Papua New Guinea: implications for antimicrobial stewardship and surveillance
    Watson Toroi, Victor Musyoki, Becky Max +5
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMicrobiologyPMCCrossrefEurope PMC
  4. Phage-ICE tandems facilitate bacterial adaptation and antimicrobial resistance spread
    Jinhu Huang, Jiaqi Zhao, Pengchao Zhan +10
    Science AdvancesPeer-reviewedCC BYEcologyCrossref
  5. The Fleming Fund: Key Features of Design and Approach to Strengthening Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.
    Tim Shorten, Jemima Clarke, Archibald Drake +3
    Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of AmericaPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMicrobiologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{aljohani2026anticipating,
  title = {{Anticipating the Next Recorded Bacterial Hosts of Plasmid-Borne Antimicrobial Resistance Genes: A Temporal Graph Analysis of Plasmid and Surveillance Data.}},
  author = {Waad A Aljohani},
  journal = {Genes},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/genes17101291},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42938407},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Anticipating the Next Recorded Bacterial Hosts of Plasmid-Borne Antimicrobial Resistance Genes: A Temporal Graph Analysis of Plasmid and Surveillance Data.
AU  - Waad A Aljohani
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/15
JO  - Genes
DO  - 10.3390/genes17101291
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42938407
AB  - Background/objectives  Plasmid-mediated dissemination of antimicrobial resistance genes complicates the control of bacterial infections. Identifying bacterial hosts likely to harbour these genes could guide genomic surveillance before such associations enter public databases. We investigated whether existing plasmid and surveillance data could anticipate which resistance gene-host associations would next be recorded in those databases, and which genomic features inform that prediction.Methods  We integrated 72,556 complete plasmid records and 2,116,241 surveillance isolates, encompassing 458 resistance gene alleles, 574 replicon backbones and 222 bacterial species. A temporal graph model, MobiGraph, was trained on associations recorded before a fixed cutoff and evaluated on subsequently observed associations, using candidate hosts matched for sequencing effort and phylogenetic distance. Ranking within a candidate pool was the primary outcome; threshold-free summaries are reported as secondary.Results  The observed host ranked among the ten highest-priority candidates in 42.4% of test cases; the advantage over gradient boosting on mechanistic features was confined to the ranking metrics, the two being indistinguishable on area under the precision-recall curve. Plasmid incompatibility-group compatibility, previous gene-host associations and shared relaxase classes were prominent predictive features. Across five resistance determinants, including mcr-1, blaNDM and tet(X4), 43-62% of subsequent associations were ranked within the top ten. Among recovered events, the median interval from the prediction cutoff to first recorded observation was 22.5 months. In a separate evaluation of a fixed 500-entry watch list, 65 entries were subsequently recorded as gene-host pairs over 25 months, 13.0% against an 8.2% background rate (95% CI 10.3-16.2%); because the surveillance database does not resolve the replicon, this confirmation does not extend to the predicted backbone.Conclusions  Existing plasmid and genomic surveillance records contain information that can help anticipate which resistance gene-host associations will next be recorded. Whether a newly recorded association reflects recent transfer or earlier under-sampling cannot be resolved from these data. These findings support prioritising bacterial hosts for targeted surveillance and experimental investigation of plasmid-mediated resistance dissemination.
SN  - 2073-4425
ER  -