Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 29 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Sharp dimensional analysis of midpoint methods for Langevin sampling

Abstract

We study deterministic and randomized midpoint discretizations of Langevin dynamics for a target π∝ e−V, where 0 ≺ αI⪯∇2V⪯βI and κ=β/α. To achieve √α W2leqslantε, we show that deterministic Heun uses at most Õ(κ4/3d1/3ε−2/3) gradient queries, and underdamped exponential midpoint uses Õ(κ5/4d1/4ε−1/2). The proofs exploit cancellation at stationarity and smoothing using techniques from Malliavin calculus, outperforming previous upper bounds based on standard couplings. At bounded condition number, a lower bound matches the d and ε powers of both deterministic methods. To contrast, for the randomized midpoint methods and Poisson midpoint with at least two grid points (both overdamped and underdamped variants), a simple Gaussian calculation yields a lower bound d1/3ε−1/3 to get an ε-close sample despite starting at a benign initialization. This shows surprisingly that in high dimensions, deterministic discretizations can outperform their random counterparts.

Related

  1. Wasserstein Bounds for Euler and Randomized Midpoint Langevin Sampling with Noisy Gradients
    Yifei Xiong, Vinayak Rao
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingStatisticsarXiv
  2. Nonlinear Assimilation via Score-Based Sequential Langevin Sampling
    Zhao Ding, Chenguang Duan, Yuling Jiao +3
    IEEE Transactions on Information TheoryPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text14 citedStatisticsOpenAlex
  3. Neural Actor--Critic Learning with Minimax Critics and Reflected Langevin Sampling
    Kunqi Huang, Lican Kang, Hongrui Shu +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Kinetic Langevin Meets Split Gibbs: Accelerated Posterior Sampling for Imaging Inverse Problems with Diffusion Priors
    Dai Hai Nguyen, Duc Dung Nguyen
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Diffusion Removes Langevin's Conditioning Dependence: A Sharp Gaussian Analysis
    Adam Perbost, Francis Bach, Pierre Marion
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{chen2026sharp,
  title = {{Sharp dimensional analysis of midpoint methods for Langevin sampling}},
  author = {Fan Chen and Sinho Chewi and Jianfeng Lu and Matthew S. Zhang},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.06308},
  eprint = {2610.06308},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.06308},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Sharp dimensional analysis of midpoint methods for Langevin sampling
AU  - Fan Chen
AU  - Sinho Chewi
AU  - Jianfeng Lu
AU  - Matthew S. Zhang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/05
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.06308
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.06308
AB  - We study deterministic and randomized midpoint discretizations of Langevin dynamics for a target π∝ e^−V, where 0 ≺ αI⪯∇^2V⪯βI and κ=β/α. To achieve √α W_2leqslantε, we show that deterministic Heun uses at most Õ(κ^4/3d^1/3ε^−2/3) gradient queries, and underdamped exponential midpoint uses Õ(κ^5/4d^1/4ε^−1/2). The proofs exploit cancellation at stationarity and smoothing using techniques from Malliavin calculus, outperforming previous upper bounds based on standard couplings. At bounded condition number, a lower bound matches the d and ε powers of both deterministic methods. To contrast, for the randomized midpoint methods and Poisson midpoint with at least two grid points (both overdamped and underdamped variants), a simple Gaussian calculation yields a lower bound d^1/3ε^−1/3 to get an ε-close sample despite starting at a benign initialization. This shows surprisingly that in high dimensions, deterministic discretizations can outperform their random counterparts.
ER  -