Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 15 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

Stop guessing thinning distances: a data-driven framework for spatial thinning parametrization for ecological modelling

Abstract

Spatially heterogeneous sampling and uneven publication effort in biodiversity repositories limit ecological niche characterization and habitat suitability modelling, affecting downstream inferences at regional and global scales. Spatial thinning offers a widely used strategy to mitigate these biases due to its simplicity and scalability. However, researchers typically select thinning parameters using heuristic or arbitrary criteria, often independent of species-specific characteristics, which introduces an additional, largely unquantified source of potential error. Here, we propose a data-driven framework for spatial thinning parameterization that replaces heuristic decision-making with principled, reproducible criteria. We define optimality as the stability of thermal niche estimates derived from empirical data, rather than as an agreement with a known true distribution. The framework integrates two complementary approaches. The Last Stable Thinning Parameterization (LS-TP) identifies the largest thinning intensity that preserves the stability of species-specific niche descriptors. Biogeographic-size Dependent Thinning Parameterization (BD-TP) links thinning intensity to species' geographic range size and scales spatial filtering across taxa with different distributional properties. Using seagrasses as a model system, we evaluated the framework across a global compilation of more than 100,000 occurrence records. Our results showed that optimal thinning parameters varied systematically with species range size and that uniform thinning approaches led to either excessive information loss or reduction of spatial clustering. Furthermore, the framework identified species for which available data did not support stable niche characterization, as these species failed to meet stability criteria even at the smallest thinning parameters. We recommend explicitly acknowledging this limitation in future studies and prioritizing increased sampling effort for such undersampled taxa. Our approaches provide a first step toward explicit, data-driven spatial thinning parameterization, with direct implications for ecological niche modelling, biodiversity assessment, and climate-driven distribution analyses.

Related

  1. Ecological connectivity modelling with WebAssembly
    A. J. Southgate, J. Redihough, T. E. Woolley
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textEcologybioRxiv
  2. Beyond the tangled bank: An evolving meta‐ecosystems framework to integrate ecological and evolutionary perspectives
    Brandon M. Lind, Ian N. C. Shuman, Linda A. Deegan +4
    American Journal of BotanyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEcologyPMC
  3. Reframing Mangroves as Socio-Ecological Coastal Infrastructure: Development and Application of a Six-Pillar Socio-Ecological Infrastructure Framework
    PARVEEN RAJJAK SHAIKH, ISAK RAJJAK SHAIKH
    EcoEvoRxivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyEvolutionary biologyEcoEvoRxiv
  4. Forest-weighted causal correlation: A scalable framework for causal inference in ecological time series
    S. Kishi
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEcologybioRxiv
  5. A Framework for Clustering and Zero-Shot Labeling of Ecological Images Using Foundation Models
    S. Ahmed, K. Bjerge, T. T. Hoye +1
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textEcologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{ibanez2026stop,
  title = {{Stop guessing thinning distances: a data-driven framework for spatial thinning parametrization for ecological modelling}},
  author = {H. Ibanez and G. Bidegain and H. Saez de Ocariz and J. Mestre-Tomas and H. Verbruggen and A. O. Jueterbock and M. A. Becerro},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.23.759308},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.23.759308v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Stop guessing thinning distances: a data-driven framework for spatial thinning parametrization for ecological modelling
AU  - H. Ibanez
AU  - G. Bidegain
AU  - H. Saez de Ocariz
AU  - J. Mestre-Tomas
AU  - H. Verbruggen
AU  - A. O. Jueterbock
AU  - M. A. Becerro
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.23.759308
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.23.759308v1
AB  - Spatially heterogeneous sampling and uneven publication effort in biodiversity repositories limit ecological niche characterization and habitat suitability modelling, affecting downstream inferences at regional and global scales. Spatial thinning offers a widely used strategy to mitigate these biases due to its simplicity and scalability. However, researchers typically select thinning parameters using heuristic or arbitrary criteria, often independent of species-specific characteristics, which introduces an additional, largely unquantified source of potential error. Here, we propose a data-driven framework for spatial thinning parameterization that replaces heuristic decision-making with principled, reproducible criteria. We define optimality as the stability of thermal niche estimates derived from empirical data, rather than as an agreement with a known true distribution. The framework integrates two complementary approaches. The Last Stable Thinning Parameterization (LS-TP) identifies the largest thinning intensity that preserves the stability of species-specific niche descriptors. Biogeographic-size Dependent Thinning Parameterization (BD-TP) links thinning intensity to species' geographic range size and scales spatial filtering across taxa with different distributional properties. Using seagrasses as a model system, we evaluated the framework across a global compilation of more than 100,000 occurrence records. Our results showed that optimal thinning parameters varied systematically with species range size and that uniform thinning approaches led to either excessive information loss or reduction of spatial clustering. Furthermore, the framework identified species for which available data did not support stable niche characterization, as these species failed to meet stability criteria even at the smallest thinning parameters. We recommend explicitly acknowledging this limitation in future studies and prioritizing increased sampling effort for such undersampled taxa. Our approaches provide a first step toward explicit, data-driven spatial thinning parameterization, with direct implications for ecological niche modelling, biodiversity assessment, and climate-driven distribution analyses.
ER  -