Negotiating security and resilience: planning conundrums for avian influenza control in Great Britain's poultry systems.
- 1Veterinary Epidemiology, Economics, and Public Health Group, Department of Pathobiology and Population Science, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, United Kingdom.
- 2Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
- 3School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Abstract
The outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in Great Britain between 2021 and 2026 represent the most severe period of virus activity recorded in the country, prompting renewed scrutiny of how biosecurity is conceptualised and practised within poultry systems. This paper examines how the structure of poultry sectors, producing meat, eggs, and game birds, shape disease risk and the possibilities for a resilient poultry ecology. Using a production and distribution network approach, we combine a desk-based review of industry, policy, grey, and published literature with qualitative data from 19 in-depth interviews, supplemented by field visits and engagement in stakeholder events. Our analysis shows that highly integrated and geographically concentrated poultry meat and layer systems interact with wild and semi-wild birds in ways which generate distinct challenges. Concentration of production and processing infrastructure, aging housing stock, consumer demand for free-range, and large-scale releases of game birds impact decisions around poultry governance and questions of risk around avian influenza incursion. We identify two cross-cutting 'entanglements' that condition avian influenza virus vulnerability: (1) poultry planning, where fragmented and often contested land-use decisions interact with environmental and biodiversity policies to shape exposure to wild and semi-wild ecologies; and (2) the insuring of poultry, where a market failure in private avian influenza insurance and uneven and contested state compensation regimes differentially distribute risk across producers and sectors. We argue that farm-level biosecurity, while necessary, is insufficient to secure Britain's poultry production under near-endemic avian influenza virus pressure. A more bio-resilient poultry future will require macro-level, multi-sectoral coordination that integrates spatial planning, infrastructure renewal, and equitable risk-sharing mechanisms for disease preparedness.
Related
- Role of urban and peri-urban agriculture in nutritional diversity, cultural resilience and community-based food security in an Eastern Himalayan city
- From yield to nutrition: re-imagining crop nutritional resilience for global nutrition security under climate change.
- From Charity to Food Social Security: Reframing Food Insecurity in a Segregated Urban Context
- AI, Food Security, and CSR: Comparative Analysis of Canada, China, and South Africa
- Green-aware intrusion detection systems: A sustainability-driven approach to network security
BibTeX
@article{hennessey2026negotiating,
title = {{Negotiating security and resilience: planning conundrums for avian influenza control in Great Britain's poultry systems.}},
author = {Mathew Hennessey and Pablo Alarcon and Paniz Hosseini and James L N Wood and Ivo Syndicus},
journal = {Environmental research. Food systems},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.1088/2976-601x/ae8dd4},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42893346},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Negotiating security and resilience: planning conundrums for avian influenza control in Great Britain's poultry systems.
AU - Mathew Hennessey
AU - Pablo Alarcon
AU - Paniz Hosseini
AU - James L N Wood
AU - Ivo Syndicus
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/21
JO - Environmental research. Food systems
DO - 10.1088/2976-601x/ae8dd4
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42893346
AB - The outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in Great Britain between 2021 and 2026 represent the most severe period of virus activity recorded in the country, prompting renewed scrutiny of how biosecurity is conceptualised and practised within poultry systems. This paper examines how the structure of poultry sectors, producing meat, eggs, and game birds, shape disease risk and the possibilities for a resilient poultry ecology. Using a production and distribution network approach, we combine a desk-based review of industry, policy, grey, and published literature with qualitative data from 19 in-depth interviews, supplemented by field visits and engagement in stakeholder events. Our analysis shows that highly integrated and geographically concentrated poultry meat and layer systems interact with wild and semi-wild birds in ways which generate distinct challenges. Concentration of production and processing infrastructure, aging housing stock, consumer demand for free-range, and large-scale releases of game birds impact decisions around poultry governance and questions of risk around avian influenza incursion. We identify two cross-cutting 'entanglements' that condition avian influenza virus vulnerability: (1) poultry planning, where fragmented and often contested land-use decisions interact with environmental and biodiversity policies to shape exposure to wild and semi-wild ecologies; and (2) the insuring of poultry, where a market failure in private avian influenza insurance and uneven and contested state compensation regimes differentially distribute risk across producers and sectors. We argue that farm-level biosecurity, while necessary, is insufficient to secure Britain's poultry production under near-endemic avian influenza virus pressure. A more bio-resilient poultry future will require macro-level, multi-sectoral coordination that integrates spatial planning, infrastructure renewal, and equitable risk-sharing mechanisms for disease preparedness.
SN - 2976-601X
ER -