Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 5 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0EcoEvoRxiv

Toward a General Theory of Heteromorphic Reproduction

Abstract

Organisms often divide reproductive investment among outputs that differ in morphology, timing, or reproductive mechanism. In this paper I extend the minimum-risk treatment of seed heteromorphism to the more general question of organisms with ‘portfolios’ of biologically distinct reproductive outputs. The resulting framework specifies a common investment and fitness currency, calculates returns and covariances across shared environmental states, and compares minimum variance at fixed expected fitness with maximization of long-run geometric growth. I then derive general inclusion criterion for an additional output and provide an analysis of two seed morphs and a clonal propagule present in four hypothetical environments. For this result, an expected return of three results in the clone reduces minimum variance by 83.6%. When both systems are optimized independently for geometric growth, the clone enters despite lower standalone arithmetic and geometric returns than the optimized seed-only portfolio, with the geometric mean growth rising by 5.2% even as arithmetic mean return falls. Overall, these illustrative calculations demonstrate the usefulness of this framework, since it provides an explicit procedure for showing how different reproductive outputs must perform as one portfolio, illustrates how to compare portfolios, and can be used to develop allocation predictions.

Related

  1. General Exploitation Theory (GET)
    Norbert Meskó
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textEvolutionary biologyOSF
  2. An ecological model of masting reproduction matches empirical dynamics
    M. Salehzadeh, J. M. Stockie, A. MacPherson
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textEcologybioRxiv
  3. Rapid evolution of learning and reproduction in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster
    E. L. Behrman, T. J. Kawecki, P. Schmidt
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull text3 citedEvolutionary biologybioRxiv
  4. Beyond reproduction: Reclaiming the full meaning of sexual and reproductive health
    Silvana Matassini Eyzaguirre, Katherine Tumlinson, Angela Muriuki +1
    PLOS Global Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral biologyEndocrinology & metabolismPLOSPMC
  5. Nutrient-dependent bet-hedging between reproduction and sporulation in Bacillus subtilis
    Manlu Zhu, Yiheng Wang, Yongfu Pei +3
    Communications BiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General biologyNatureCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{hughes2026toward,
  title = {{Toward a General Theory of Heteromorphic Reproduction}},
  author = {P. William Hughes},
  howpublished = {EcoEvoRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.32942/x2p67j},
  url = {https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/15190/},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Toward a General Theory of Heteromorphic Reproduction
AU  - P. William Hughes
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
PB  - EcoEvoRxiv
DO  - 10.32942/x2p67j
UR  - https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/15190/
AB  - Organisms often divide reproductive investment among outputs that differ in morphology, timing, or reproductive mechanism. In this paper I extend the minimum-risk treatment of seed heteromorphism to the more general question of organisms with ‘portfolios’ of biologically distinct reproductive outputs. The resulting framework specifies a common investment and fitness currency, calculates returns and covariances across shared environmental states, and compares minimum variance at fixed expected fitness with maximization of long-run geometric growth. I then derive general inclusion criterion for an additional output and provide an analysis of two seed morphs and a clonal propagule present in four hypothetical environments. For this result, an expected return of three results in the clone reduces minimum variance by 83.6%. When both systems are optimized independently for geometric growth, the clone enters despite lower standalone arithmetic and geometric returns than the optimized seed-only portfolio, with the geometric mean growth rising by 5.2% even as arithmetic mean return falls. Overall, these illustrative calculations demonstrate the usefulness of this framework, since it provides an explicit procedure for showing how different reproductive outputs must perform as one portfolio, illustrates how to compare portfolios, and can be used to develop allocation predictions.
ER  -