Outcomes of Transfer Destination in Patients With STEMI
- 1Northwell, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
- 2Northwell Cardiovascular Institute, Manhasset, New York, USA
- 3Plainview Hospital, Plainview, New York, USA
Abstract
Background: The optimal transfer destination for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction presenting to nonpercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-capable hospitals remains unclear, particularly where both enhanced community (EC) hospitals with PCI capability and quaternary centers are available.
Project Rationale: Guidelines emphasize timely reperfusion but provide limited evidence on whether outcomes differ by hospital tier once PCI capability is ensured.
Project Summary: Retrospective before-after quality improvement noninferiority analysis of 54 consecutive patients (EC n = 22, quaternary centers n = 32) presenting to a non–PCI-capable community hospital, comparing first door-to-balloon times, need for subsequent transfer, and major adverse cardiac events. Transfer to EC demonstrated noninferior (P < 0.0001) and significantly shorter door-to-balloon times (90.8 ± 15.5 vs 101.6 ± 18.9 min; P = 0.03) with equivalent major adverse cardiac events.
Take-Home Message: Transferring patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction to a nearby EC PCI-capable hospitals enables faster reperfusion while maintaining quality and safety of care.
Related
- Prognostic Impact of Recreational Drug Use on 1-Year Outcomes in NSTEMI and STEMI Patients
- Sequential blastocyst transfer improved pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: who will be the ultimate beneficiary
- Relation of serum electrolytes and left ventricular functions in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI
- Nationwide Evolution of Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Outcomes Following Introduction of the HeartMate 3 and Destination Therapy in Japan ― The Third Official Report From J-MACS ―
- Differences in treatment and outcome of patients with ST- elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-STEMI in Germany
BibTeX
@article{gilchrist2026outcomes,
title = {{Outcomes of Transfer Destination in Patients With STEMI}},
author = {Ian C. Gilchrist and April E.P. Read and Amgad N. Makaryus and Ellen M. Kelly and Loukas S. Boutis},
journal = {JACC Case Reports},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1016/j.jaccas.2026.109530},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccas.2026.109530},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Outcomes of Transfer Destination in Patients With STEMI
AU - Ian C. Gilchrist
AU - April E.P. Read
AU - Amgad N. Makaryus
AU - Ellen M. Kelly
AU - Loukas S. Boutis
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/16
JO - JACC Case Reports
DO - 10.1016/j.jaccas.2026.109530
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccas.2026.109530
AB - Background: The optimal transfer destination for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction presenting to nonpercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-capable hospitals remains unclear, particularly where both enhanced community (EC) hospitals with PCI capability and quaternary centers are available. Project Rationale: Guidelines emphasize timely reperfusion but provide limited evidence on whether outcomes differ by hospital tier once PCI capability is ensured. Project Summary: Retrospective before-after quality improvement noninferiority analysis of 54 consecutive patients (EC n = 22, quaternary centers n = 32) presenting to a non–PCI-capable community hospital, comparing first door-to-balloon times, need for subsequent transfer, and major adverse cardiac events. Transfer to EC demonstrated noninferior (P < 0.0001) and significantly shorter door-to-balloon times (90.8 ± 15.5 vs 101.6 ± 18.9 min; P = 0.03) with equivalent major adverse cardiac events. Take-Home Message: Transferring patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction to a nearby EC PCI-capable hospitals enables faster reperfusion while maintaining quality and safety of care.
SN - 2666-0849
ER -