Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,357 studies31 sourcesUpdated 39 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

The Multisensory Hallucinations Schedule to assess hallucinations across multiple sensory modalities in psychosis: A pilot validation study

4 affiliations
  1. 1Centre for Mental Health & Brain Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  2. 2Department of Psychology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  3. 3Department of Psychiatry, St Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  4. 4InsideOut Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Abstract

Objective:: Hallucination studies in psychiatry have typically focused on the auditory domain, despite mounting evidence that non-auditory hallucinations are prevalent, and elicit distress and functional interference. Proponents have called for more in-depth phenomenological enquiries into hallucinations across multiple sensory modalities, but there are no comprehensive, validated assessment tools to date. This study aimed to document the design and pilot validation of such a transdiagnostic instrument – the Multisensory Hallucinations Schedule.

Methods:: Leveraging off a precursor measure, the Multisensory Hallucinations Schedule comprised eight modules: Auditory, Visual, Olfactory, Somatic-tactile, Gustatory, Other modalities, Multimodal and Delusions, across lifetime and current time frames. Pilot validation analyses sought to confirm its factor structure via principal components analyses, verify acceptability, convergent and divergent validities, and compute reliability (equivalence and stability) statistics as well as internal consistencies.

Results:: Based on 76 participants diagnosed with a primary psychotic illness, the Multisensory Hallucinations Schedule demonstrated acceptable factor structure, with two- to four-factor solutions generated across its subscales, explaining 39.2–76.9% of variance. It displayed excellent acceptability (98.7% completion) as well as robust convergent (r < 0.807) and divergent (r > 0.005) validities. Moderate to high equivalence (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.574–0.993) and stability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.535–0.991), and good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.462–0.851) were shown.

Conclusions:: The Multisensory Hallucinations Schedule represents an initial foray into inclusively documenting multisensory hallucinations in psychosis. Future validation endeavours should look towards replication using more robust participant numbers as well as expanding to other psychiatric and neurological cohorts experiencing prominent hallucinations.

Related

  1. Distinct patterns of multisensory integration underly the expression of flavor preferences and aversions in rats
    I. B. Allar, A. L. Berenguer-Nascimento, B. N. McNally +3
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  2. Perceptual integration of multisensory haptic, visual, and auditory feedback for roughness discrimination in augmented reality
    S. Bonnet, R. Ericsson, I. Zhurakovskaia +2
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NDFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  3. Multisensory perceptual decision-making persists as alertness fades, even in the absence of an overt response
    C. Alameda, D. Sanabria, T. A. Bekinschtein +1
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  4. Patient-specific functional networks track early cognitive alterations and minor hallucinations in Parkinson’s disease
    Sara Stampacchia, Fosco Bernasconi, Dimitri Van De Ville +7
    Nature Mental HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY7 citedNeuroscienceOpenAlex
  5. Symbolic categorization of novel multisensory stimuli in the human brain
    Simone Viganò, Valentina Borghesani, Manuela Piazza
    NeuroImagePeer-reviewedCC BYFull text15 citedNeuroscienceHAL
BibTeX
@article{toh2026multisensory,
  title = {{The Multisensory Hallucinations Schedule to assess hallucinations across multiple sensory modalities in psychosis: A pilot validation study}},
  author = {Wei Lin Toh and Adrienne Bell and Mikaela Bere and Susan Lee Rossell},
  journal = {The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry},
  year = {2026},
  month = jun,
  doi = {10.1177/00048674261457016},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674261457016},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The Multisensory Hallucinations Schedule to assess hallucinations across multiple sensory modalities in psychosis: A pilot validation study
AU  - Wei Lin Toh
AU  - Adrienne Bell
AU  - Mikaela Bere
AU  - Susan Lee Rossell
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/06/23
JO  - The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
DO  - 10.1177/00048674261457016
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674261457016
AB  - Objective:: Hallucination studies in psychiatry have typically focused on the auditory domain, despite mounting evidence that non-auditory hallucinations are prevalent, and elicit distress and functional interference. Proponents have called for more in-depth phenomenological enquiries into hallucinations across multiple sensory modalities, but there are no comprehensive, validated assessment tools to date. This study aimed to document the design and pilot validation of such a transdiagnostic instrument – the Multisensory Hallucinations Schedule.  Methods:: Leveraging off a precursor measure, the Multisensory Hallucinations Schedule comprised eight modules: Auditory, Visual, Olfactory, Somatic-tactile, Gustatory, Other modalities, Multimodal and Delusions, across lifetime and current time frames. Pilot validation analyses sought to confirm its factor structure via principal components analyses, verify acceptability, convergent and divergent validities, and compute reliability (equivalence and stability) statistics as well as internal consistencies.  Results:: Based on 76 participants diagnosed with a primary psychotic illness, the Multisensory Hallucinations Schedule demonstrated acceptable factor structure, with two- to four-factor solutions generated across its subscales, explaining 39.2–76.9% of variance. It displayed excellent acceptability (98.7% completion) as well as robust convergent (r < 0.807) and divergent (r > 0.005) validities. Moderate to high equivalence (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.574–0.993) and stability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.535–0.991), and good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.462–0.851) were shown.  Conclusions:: The Multisensory Hallucinations Schedule represents an initial foray into inclusively documenting multisensory hallucinations in psychosis. Future validation endeavours should look towards replication using more robust participant numbers as well as expanding to other psychiatric and neurological cohorts experiencing prominent hallucinations.
SN  - 0004-8674
SN  - 1440-1614
ER  -