Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
210,049 studies31 sourcesUpdated 23 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Europace

Safety and effectiveness of a novel dual-energy radiofrequency/pulsed field ablation catheter: 12-month results of the FlexPulse study

4 more authors

Abstract

Aims: Pulsed field (PF) ablation is increasingly used to treat paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). FlexPulse (NCT06676072) was conducted to evaluate safety and effectiveness of a novel dual-energy, flexible-tip focal ablation catheter with radiofrequency and PF for treatment of symptomatic, drug-refractory PAF.

Methods and results: FlexPulse was a global, prospective, single-arm, multicentre study. The ablation procedures targeted pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and adjunctive ablation at operators’ discretion. The primary safety endpoint was occurrence of pre-defined safety events within 7 days of any ablation procedure. The primary effectiveness endpoint was freedom from a composite of recurrent AF/atrial tachycardia/atrial flutter, repeat procedure, new use or escalation of class I/III AAD, and/or cardioversion through 12-months. Overall, 180 subjects underwent PAF ablation. Successful PVI was achieved in all participants. Additional non-PV ablations were performed in 37.2% (67/180) of subjects. The primary safety endpoint event rate was 1.7%. The primary effectiveness endpoint was 74.6% at 12 months, and freedom from documented AF/AFL/AT recurrence was 77.4% (92.6% without weekly transtelephonic monitoring). In 15 subjects who underwent repeat ablation after the blanking period, remapping indicated that 79.7% (47/59) of the PVs were durably isolated from the index procedures. Retrospective analysis found that workflows with PFA Index (PI) ≥ 30 and AutoMark distance up to 6 mm target had a 12-month freedom from AF/AFL/AT of 84.6%.

Conclusion: In this trial, ablation with TactiFlex Duo in patients with symptomatic, drug-refractory PAF was safe and effective.

Related

  1. Predictive Value of Left Atrial Strain Combined with Low-Voltage Substrate for Recurrence After Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Radiofrequency ablation with a conventional solid tip catheter in contact with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator coil causing inadvertent ventricular fibrillation.
    Michael R Manogue
    HeartRhythm case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMC
  3. Dual-Energy Pulsed Field and Radiofrequency Ablation With a Contact Force-Sensing Focal Catheter for Ventricular Arrhythmias: Initial Clinical Experience
    A. Darma, S.-E. Waezsada, N. Trajkovska +10
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textCardiovascular medicinemedRxiv
  4. Massive Left Atrial Thrombosis Shortly After Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation: Implications of Reduced Flow Dynamics Detected by Four-Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Kodai Egashira, Hiro Yamasaki, Tabito Kino +2
    Journal of arrhythmiaPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMC
  5. Left Inferior Pulmonary Vein Thrombosis and Secondary Lung Infarction Following Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation: A Diagnostic Challenge.
    Karen M'bie, Pascale Bohy, Aurore Margot
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{hussein2026safety,
  title = {{Safety and effectiveness of a novel dual-energy radiofrequency/pulsed field ablation catheter: 12-month results of the FlexPulse study}},
  author = {Ayman A Hussein and Gediminas Rackauskas and Sri Sundaram and Jonathan P Piccini and Franz Xaver Roithinger and Patricia Tung and Jose Osorio and B Judson Colley and Usman R Siddiqui and Dhanunjaya R Lakkireddy and Larry A Chinitz and Matthew C Hyman and Laura Zitella Verbick and Nick Dirckx and Virginia Woods and Monica Lo},
  journal = {Europace},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1093/europace/euag238},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euag238},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Safety and effectiveness of a novel dual-energy radiofrequency/pulsed field ablation catheter: 12-month results of the FlexPulse study
AU  - Ayman A Hussein
AU  - Gediminas Rackauskas
AU  - Sri Sundaram
AU  - Jonathan P Piccini
AU  - Franz Xaver Roithinger
AU  - Patricia Tung
AU  - Jose Osorio
AU  - B Judson Colley
AU  - Usman R Siddiqui
AU  - Dhanunjaya R Lakkireddy
AU  - Larry A Chinitz
AU  - Matthew C Hyman
AU  - Laura Zitella Verbick
AU  - Nick Dirckx
AU  - Virginia Woods
AU  - Monica Lo
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/28
JO  - Europace
DO  - 10.1093/europace/euag238
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euag238
AB  - Aims: Pulsed field (PF) ablation is increasingly used to treat paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). FlexPulse (NCT06676072) was conducted to evaluate safety and effectiveness of a novel dual-energy, flexible-tip focal ablation catheter with radiofrequency and PF for treatment of symptomatic, drug-refractory PAF.  Methods and results: FlexPulse was a global, prospective, single-arm, multicentre study. The ablation procedures targeted pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and adjunctive ablation at operators’ discretion. The primary safety endpoint was occurrence of pre-defined safety events within 7 days of any ablation procedure. The primary effectiveness endpoint was freedom from a composite of recurrent AF/atrial tachycardia/atrial flutter, repeat procedure, new use or escalation of class I/III AAD, and/or cardioversion through 12-months. Overall, 180 subjects underwent PAF ablation. Successful PVI was achieved in all participants. Additional non-PV ablations were performed in 37.2% (67/180) of subjects. The primary safety endpoint event rate was 1.7%. The primary effectiveness endpoint was 74.6% at 12 months, and freedom from documented AF/AFL/AT recurrence was 77.4% (92.6% without weekly transtelephonic monitoring). In 15 subjects who underwent repeat ablation after the blanking period, remapping indicated that 79.7% (47/59) of the PVs were durably isolated from the index procedures. Retrospective analysis found that workflows with PFA Index (PI) ≥ 30 and AutoMark distance up to 6 mm target had a 12-month freedom from AF/AFL/AT of 84.6%.  Conclusion: In this trial, ablation with TactiFlex Duo in patients with symptomatic, drug-refractory PAF was safe and effective.
SN  - 1099-5129
SN  - 1532-2092
ER  -