Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 47 min ago
PreprintCC BYmedRxiv

A spatial AI-based biomarker with independent prognostic value in early low- and intermediate- risk breast cancer

  1. 1Karolinska Instittutet

Abstract

BackgroundPatients with ER-positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer of low or intermediate grade are generally considered to have a favourable prognosis, yet a number will recur. This risk is poorly captured by standard clinicopathological factors. AI-based medical devices for whole slide image (WSI) analyses used for risk-stratification often predict on slide-level thereby overlooking spatial localisation of the biomarkers. We hypothesise that the spatial distribution of a previously reported AI-based marker provides independent prognostic value beyond its global score.

Patients and MethodsThis Swedish multicentre cohort study includes 6106 patients with primary invasive breast cancer: 3078 from the Stockholm region (training) and 3028 from Sk[a]ne (independent test). Tile-level high-grade morphology scores were generated with ViT_DG, a vision-transformer adaptation of DeepGrade, and the presence of clusters of high-risk tiles localised at the invasive tumour front was defined as a binary biomarker. Primary analyses were pre-specified in the ER-positive/HER2-negative/lymph-node-negative and Grade 1-2 subgroup. Association with breast-cancer recurrence-free interval (BCRFI) and distant metastasis were assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models (HR).

ResultsIn the primary subgroup (n=1536 training; n=1403 test), tumour front clusters were present in 37% and 39% of patients. Cluster-positive status was associated with a 2.30-fold increased risk in the external test. Cluster-negative patients achieved a 10-year BCRFI of 95.3%, equivalent to Grade 1 patients and better than Grade 2 (92.4%), whereas cluster-positive patients (90.2%) did worse than the Grade 3 reference. The association was retained in patients classified as low-risk by ViT_DG (test set multivariable HR 2.86), identifying high-risk patients not captured by the global score.

ConclusionsThe absence of high-risk morphology clusters at the tumour front is an independent prognostic indicator, identifying a low-risk group independently of the global AI biomarker classification. More broadly, preserving the spatial distribution of AI-derived predictions enables prognostic stratification beyond slide-level aggregation.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02306096

Related

  1. Baseline serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is an independent prognostic biomarker for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients receiving 177Lu-PSMA therapy
    Emilio Francesco Giunta, Irene Marini, Ilaria Grassi +11
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular ImagingPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textMedical imaging & radiologyPMC
  2. Joint neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio-systemic inflammation response index score as an independent prognostic biomarker for immunotherapy-treated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
    Kena Lian, Honggang Cao, Zizhuang Si +2
    Translational cancer researchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textOncologyEurope PMC
  3. Unveiling GSPT1 as a crucial prognostic biomarker and therapeutic vulnerability in breast cancer
    Huafei Wang, Chenxi Li, Zhu Zhu +6
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyDOAJ
  4. Transcriptomic Profiling of Mouse Mammary Tumors Enables Prognostic and Predictive Biomarker Discovery for Human Breast Cancer
    Matthew D. Sutcliffe, Kevin R. Mott, Tulay Yilmaz-Swenson +15
    Cancer ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textOncologyPMC
  5. ABCF2 is a prognostic and immunological pan-cancer biomarker with growth-promoting function in breast cancer: a multi-omics study
    Yinuan Shi, Yiyang Wang, Yongxiang Li +4
    Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0OncologyFrontiersCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{boissin2026spatial,
  title = {{A spatial AI-based biomarker with independent prognostic value in early low- and intermediate- risk breast cancer}},
  author = {C. Boissin and Y. Xiang and B. Liu and J. Vallon-Christersson and E. Walker and J. Hartman and M. Rantalainen},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.07.26364961},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.07.26364961v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - A spatial AI-based biomarker with independent prognostic value in early low- and intermediate- risk breast cancer
AU  - C. Boissin
AU  - Y. Xiang
AU  - B. Liu
AU  - J. Vallon-Christersson
AU  - E. Walker
AU  - J. Hartman
AU  - M. Rantalainen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/07
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.07.26364961
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.07.26364961v1
AB  - BackgroundPatients with ER-positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer of low or intermediate grade are generally considered to have a favourable prognosis, yet a number will recur. This risk is poorly captured by standard clinicopathological factors. AI-based medical devices for whole slide image (WSI) analyses used for risk-stratification often predict on slide-level thereby overlooking spatial localisation of the biomarkers. We hypothesise that the spatial distribution of a previously reported AI-based marker provides independent prognostic value beyond its global score.  Patients and MethodsThis Swedish multicentre cohort study includes 6106 patients with primary invasive breast cancer: 3078 from the Stockholm region (training) and 3028 from Sk[a]ne (independent test). Tile-level high-grade morphology scores were generated with ViT_DG, a vision-transformer adaptation of DeepGrade, and the presence of clusters of high-risk tiles localised at the invasive tumour front was defined as a binary biomarker. Primary analyses were pre-specified in the ER-positive/HER2-negative/lymph-node-negative and Grade 1-2 subgroup. Association with breast-cancer recurrence-free interval (BCRFI) and distant metastasis were assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models (HR).  ResultsIn the primary subgroup (n=1536 training; n=1403 test), tumour front clusters were present in 37% and 39% of patients. Cluster-positive status was associated with a 2.30-fold increased risk in the external test. Cluster-negative patients achieved a 10-year BCRFI of 95.3%, equivalent to Grade 1 patients and better than Grade 2 (92.4%), whereas cluster-positive patients (90.2%) did worse than the Grade 3 reference. The association was retained in patients classified as low-risk by ViT_DG (test set multivariable HR 2.86), identifying high-risk patients not captured by the global score.  ConclusionsThe absence of high-risk morphology clusters at the tumour front is an independent prognostic indicator, identifying a low-risk group independently of the global AI biomarker classification. More broadly, preserving the spatial distribution of AI-derived predictions enables prognostic stratification beyond slide-level aggregation.  ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02306096
ER  -