Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,469 studies31 sourcesUpdated 4 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Subset selection for matrices by volume sampling

Abstract

We address the Subset selection problem for matrices, where the goal is to select a subset 𝒮 of k column indices from a \enquote{short-and-fat} matrix X ∈ ℝm × n, such that the sampled submatrix X𝒮 has |X𝒮†X|F as small as possible. Our approach is centered on volume sampling, which attains the tightest known bound on this objective in expectation. As our primary contribution, we propose a new deterministic algorithm, Forward derandomized volume sampling (FDVS), which provably attains this bound and has asymptotic complexity O(nkm). In contrast, the complexity of all previously known algorithms with this guarantee scales at least quadratically in n when k ≪ n, making FDVS particularly attractive for very wide matrices. In addition, we systematically structure the landscape of volume sampling methods: we propose a simple O(nm2) algorithm for exact forward volume sampling, show that a known deterministic method is in fact a derandomization of Reverse iterative volume sampling, and derive a modification of the latter that avoids repeated SVD downdating, along with a fast greedy forward variant. The algorithms are verified and compared in numerical experiments involving optimal experimental design, sensor placement, and DLRA-DEIM.

Related

  1. Incremental Column Subset Selection via Conditional Determinantal Point Processes
    Laura Grigori, Zhipeng Xue
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
  2. Sequential Optimization of Multiple Stopping Times with Spatial Subset Selection
    Roméo Tayewo, François Septier, Ido Nevat +1
    Methodology and Computing in Applied ProbabilityPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsHAL
  3. Poisson Exchange Beyond Submodularity: Effective Approximation Algorithms for Offline and Online Subset Selection over Matroids
    Shi Fu, Youming Qiao, Dacheng Tao +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  4. Smallest Singular Value Estimates for Nonuniform Fourier Matrices via Periodic Nonuniform Sampling
    Liang Chen, Rongrong Lin, Haizhang Zhang
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
  5. Frequency sorting in graded dispersive resonator arrays via volume-interaction matrices
    Konstantinos Alexopoulos
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsMathematical physicsHALarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{kozyrev2026subset,
  title = {{Subset selection for matrices by volume sampling}},
  author = {Ivan Kozyrev and Alexander Osinsky},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.08576},
  eprint = {2610.08576},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.08576},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Subset selection for matrices by volume sampling
AU  - Ivan Kozyrev
AU  - Alexander Osinsky
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/06
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.08576
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.08576
AB  - We address the Subset selection problem for matrices, where the goal is to select a subset 𝒮 of k column indices from a \enquote{short-and-fat} matrix X ∈ ℝ^m × n, such that the sampled submatrix X_𝒮 has |X_𝒮^†X|_F as small as possible. Our approach is centered on volume sampling, which attains the tightest known bound on this objective in expectation. As our primary contribution, we propose a new deterministic algorithm, Forward derandomized volume sampling (FDVS), which provably attains this bound and has asymptotic complexity O(nkm). In contrast, the complexity of all previously known algorithms with this guarantee scales at least quadratically in n when k ≪ n, making FDVS particularly attractive for very wide matrices. In addition, we systematically structure the landscape of volume sampling methods: we propose a simple O(nm^2) algorithm for exact forward volume sampling, show that a known deterministic method is in fact a derandomization of Reverse iterative volume sampling, and derive a modification of the latter that avoids repeated SVD downdating, along with a fast greedy forward variant. The algorithms are verified and compared in numerical experiments involving optimal experimental design, sensor placement, and DLRA-DEIM.
ER  -